Goodreads Librarians Group discussion
Policies & Practices
>
Book Formats
date
newest »



I'm just wondering if we want to go into more detail - at least some of the time. But I'd like to be consistent about it.
There's a few where I've used "Box set" for where you get a few books inside a box (games).
I've thought about 'Oversized paperback' for paperbacks about the size of most hardcover books. This is one of the things that made me post this thread.
But once I start thinking about going down that road, it's hard to stop. I start wondering about books in an 8 1/2 x 11 format (very common in certain niches, unknown outside them). Or graphic novels, which have a common format of... 7 x 10 (I think, have to check again...), except for the smaller format ones that have gotten popular.
I wouldn't want to tie anything down to strict definitions. But 'paperback' and 'hardcover' do have certain connotations of size associated with them for me that aren't always true.
(That said, even if there were guidelines for a more expansive system, it should still default back down to paperback/hardcover.)

To be really accurate, "mass market" versus "trade paperback" is used to differentiate between methods of distribution, not really format -- unsold mass market paperbacks are destroyed while unsold trade paperbacks are sent back to the publisher. But in popular parlance, "mass market" = standard paperbacks and "trade paperback" = oversized paperbacks, smaller paperbacks, paperbacks bound on the short side, etc. So broadly speaking, you'd be fine putting one of three descriptions in "format": hardcover, mass market paperback, trade paperback.
There's a bunch of 'Mass-market Paperbacks' from Amazon, but I haven't the foggiest what the difference between that and a regular paperback would be.
I've been thinking it might be nice if we could be a bit more descriptive about the formats out there. (Though if you start worrying about size and things like saddlestiching, there's a lot of formats out there!)