Glens Falls (NY) Online Book Discussion Group discussion
note: This topic has been closed to new comments.
ABOUT BOOKS AND READING
>
What are U reading these days? (PART EIGHT (2012) (ONGOING THREAD for 2012)


It's mind-blowing to me that people can be swayed so easily by pressure from those around them but we see it all the time.

I saw a movie about Vlad Tepes and he said how greed motivates men to do evil things, but while in captivity he learned that fear was even better. He became a man to be feared in during his reign in Wallachia.

I saw a movie about Vlad Tepes and he said how greed motivates men to do evil thi..."
I guess it all comes under the heading of "indoctrination". There are many methods of persuasion. See my review of Freedom of Mind at:
http://www.goodreads.com/review/show/...
See the acronym: BITE which stands for:
---Behavior control
---Information control
---Thought control
---Emotional control


Frightening, isn't it?


Yes, I think the same was true of Mussolini in Italy. He headed many programs which improved Italy's domestic situation.



As for change, there's usually a trade-off. You gain in one way but you lose in another way. Life is full of trade-offs. Some are good and some aren't so good.



(On a side note, I just finished reading Fall of Giants, which covers WW1. The second book, Winter of the World, covers WW2, and I'm hoping that start it this week.) I'm such a sucker for WW2 stuff... and the WW1 book was amazing. I plan to read more about WW1.

Nina, that is so horrific! So sad.

Hi Jenni. Good to see you here again! I have several books by Ken Follett on my To-Read shelf. One of these days I will try one of them.
Just now, I looked back at my previous comments. At one point I wrote: "I tried reading The Pillars of the Earth but couldn't get into it. Too many characters were introduced at once, if I remember correctly."

Who knew that he would turn into such an evil? Possibly the government that put him in prison before that, but they were the ones that allowed their own people to starve. I guess folks just didn't have a lot of good choices at the time.
How well informed were the people of what he was doing? Did anyone know what happened to the people who disappeared, at least at first? Wasn't there some sort of letter writing cover up that went on for years in some cases?

Jim - You know, I think I remember someone in this thread mentioning that people weren't well-informed of what he was doing, at least at first. I've been reading a lot of Russian historical fiction lately... and have found that (it seems) like the average person really had no idea how incredibly much the government was covering up... So yes, I sure could believe that the Germans didn't know what all was going on at first, especially since he did do good for the country at first.

Thanks too for recommending Follett's Whiteout. I'll put on my To-Read shelf.

I loathe political ads & that's because they're a good example of what I mean. A bash ad says, "X voted against [insert something good]". Yes, X voted against a bill that would have done this good thing, but it also would have done 5 other things that were awful. Those things just aren't mentioned. This is 'truth' in the political world.
Read Bradbury's Fahrenheit 451. My review has the quote by Captain Beatty that I think is particularly pertinent here:
http://www.goodreads.com/review/show/...
Bradbury's own statements about how this book was so ironically 'burned' are also mentioned.
For in depth political coverage, some listen to talking heads like Limbaugh or Maher. The fact that they have sponsors to please, thus are paid to have an opinion with a particular slant, doesn't do much for their presentation of the facts. I saw some on Jeopardy not long ago & they were completely ignorant of well known historical facts in their own fields, but they're probably smart people. It's tough to be informed & I wonder if anyone can do it. Maybe that's why the president either goes gray or loses all his hair.
Even a bit of reading outside our normal realm will show just how ignorant we are. I read Illicit: How Smugglers, Traffickers, and Copycats are Hijacking the Global Economy, a bit of Middle Eastern recent history, & some related searches. I've decided I have no clue about US foreign policy. I mean, none. I can't say that what we do is good or bad or what a decent alternative is. The only sure thing is the next step is going to be into another cow pie.
Afghanistan is a good example. The Taliban was horrible, but they hated drugs & kept a lid on them. We got rid of them & the country returned to its cash crop, opium. Not only can a local farmer make a lot more money with less work than if he raised wheat, but the warlords of the areas demand that he do so. Thousands are fleeing the country & are in camps on the borders. Our invasion was a good thing? Bad?
We helped create Kuwait by cutting it out of Iraq half a century or so ago. I remember hearing about it in the 70's as the richest country per capita in the world & how great it was that we'd helped them up. No one mentioned that 2% of the population held 98% of that money, though. Not exactly a shining example of democracy. Of course, our fiddling hasn't exactly worked out so well today, either.
Every little piece of the world is complicated & all those pieces tie together very closely today. People we've never heard of can suddenly cause global crises. A student in the Philippines caused companies around the globe to lose billions of dollars on a lark (the Love Letter virus). A minister in Pakistan made a few bucks through his cousin in the Philippines & North Korea wound up with nuclear technology. Floods in Taiwan caused a hard drive shortage throughout the world not long ago. One earthquake in Japan completely shut down RAM manufacturing for 6 months back in the 90's. A 1 mb stick of RAM went from $35 to $125 almost over night.
I met a gal from Uzbekistan who loathed either UNICEF or the United Way - can't recall which. It seems that every time the charity gave school supplies to her area, her family was forced to buy them. No, that's not the way it's supposed to work, but that's the reality of living under the current president. As one of the Russian minority, this gal never even got a chance to vote. She was told to come back in the afternoon & then told she should have voted in the morning.
Most people probably never heard of half the above. How many other things of even more importance happen every day? Yet we feel we're well informed? No, I can't cast stones at some German who got sucked in by Hitler & realized too late what he had really supported.

All good points, Jim. I wonder if any of our presidents ever really understood the whole picture, even though they have advisors who are supposed to be experts.

Jim, I totally agree! Also, even though we are drowning in information, there is just so much that the government won't tell us... even when it knows. And then we get these half-truths, and are often not told of the consequences (as you pointed out)... it's frustrating.
Thanks for both book recommendations, I've been meaning to read the Ray Bradbury book for awhile, and that second book looks quite interesting. :)

And even though I just read the 451 review only a month ago, I have to repeat myself and say it's one of the best reviews I've ever had the pleasure to read. I haven't done audio yet, but if/when I do, the edition you recommend is the one I'll choose.


-----------
Jenni, if you want to read 'Illicit' PM me your address & I'll pass it along. I won't be re-reading it, but it was an eye-opener.
"...even when it knows..." is a really good point & ties in with what Joy mentioned. The buck might stop at the presidential desk, but there are plenty that fall into black holes within the burgeoning Federal bureaucratic morass.
----------
Jackie, thank you!

The invasion was in response to a first strike on New York City by the Taliban, who allied themselves with al-Qaeda, so in my vocabulary it was GOOD. Everyone I know (though I admit my acquaintances aren't terribly broad) approved of the invasion wholeheartedly. Washington's prosecution of the war, and indeed any of our wars, is where the problem is. There are no selfless patriots in Washington, they WILL NOT fight wars to WIN. They simply want to drag them out, make themselves money, get corporate backing for reelection and wait till Americas stomach for returning body bags reaches a saturation point, then beat a retreat.
And no, I don't give a damn about Afghanistan, they are the enemy, they are still killing our guys. I have even stronger emotions about Pakistan.

Osama bin Laden and his organization did put down roots in Afghanistan, starting when he was fighting (with U.S. support, at the time) against the Soviet occupation; and the Taliban did consider him an ally in pushing their brand of extremist Islam. Interestingly, though, it's come to light that before 9/11, the Taliban foreign minister sent an emissary to a U.S. intelligence official in Pakistan (we didn't have diplomatic relations with the Taliban regime at the time, I believe) to warn him that a major attack on U.S. soil was being plotted. That official decided not to bother passing on the warning to Washington, on the grounds that he'd been hearing the same thing from a number of sources and it hadn't materialized yet. (!! :-( ) And after 9/11, when the U.S. demanded that the Afghans hand over bin Laden, they did NOT outright refuse to. They did ask to first see evidence of his guilt (which I suspect was a face-saving measure), which is not, on its face, an unreasonable request. The Bush administration refused on the grounds that it would "compromise our intelligence." That sounds good, until you ask the obvious question, wouldn't presenting the evidence in court at his trial also have "compromised our intelligence?" (Unless they simply intended to shoot him on the plane, a course I wouldn't approve of. I'm not cool with giving the government carte blanche to kill anybody they think deserves it; if you agree with their assessment of dessert this time, the next time you may not.) IMO, it's entirely possible that if Bush had met their request, bin Laden would have been handed over and faced punishment at the time, and a lot of people who are dead now would still be living.
It's true that the Taliban government was a brutal, despotic regime with a warped ideology. I just don't happen to think that it's America's mission to save everybody in the world from every brutal, despotic regime with a warped ideology that exists anywhere (and there are quite a few of them!), and send American soldiers to their deaths to do it. Nor do I favor engaging in acts of war without a legal and constitutional declaration of war. That isn't an idiot's quibble; it's a determination to place the deciding power in the hands where it belongs, if this polity is a republic and not a dictatorship.
(Now I'll get down from my soapbox and shut up. :-) )

http://www.goodreads.com/review/show/...
I'm going to start on Hammered next.

=====
Earl & Werner, I'm more interested in the results. Did we do a good thing getting rid of the Taliban? I don't know enough, but it sure looks like we just traded one bad situation for an equally bad one from the little I know - the cow pie shuffle I mentioned.

=====
Thanks Jim! I'll let you know when I get it... and it's much appreciated. :)

http://www.goodreads.com/review/show/...
I'm going to start on Hammered next."
Jim, I like Hearne's titles in The Iron Druid Chronicles: "Hounded", "Hexed", "Hammered", and "Hunted", among them. I liked your review of "Hounded". Now I'm wondering what those "different critters", mentioned in your review, were. :)


I don't feel GoodReads is a proper forum for this political discussion, so after this reply I too will dismount the soapbox and shut up. But I can't resist contradicting you this final time.
Werner wrote: "And after 9/11, when the U.S. demanded that the Afghans hand over bin Laden, they did NOT outright refuse to. They did ask to first see evidence of his guilt (which I suspect was a face-saving measure), which is not, on its face, an unreasonable request. The Bush administration refused on the grounds that it would "compromise our intelligence." That sounds good, until you ask the obvious question, wouldn't presenting the evidence in court at his trial also have "compromised our intelligence?" (Unless they simply intended to shoot him on the plane, a course I wouldn't approve of. I'm not cool with giving the government carte blanche to kill anybody they think deserves it; if you agree with their assessment of dessert this time, the next time you may not.) IMO, it's entirely possible that if Bush had met their request, bin Laden would have been handed over and faced punishment at the time, and a lot of people who are dead now would still be living.
From that reasoned reply I conclude this:
The Taliban regime chose to resist America at that point because we're a 'paper tiger' (besides being infidel dogs they automatically hate). But this time America was angry and they were too stupid to realize the difference. They chose to become our enemy.
Yes, we have "traded one cowpie for another". That is because there are still plenty of Taliban who are not dead. And this is Washington's fault for not prosecuting that war to WIN! Come back Harry Truman, we need you again.

So, you missed the point I was making if you think I want or asked for a political discussion, much less think that you're contradicting me. I simply used Afghanistan as an example of how screwed up things could get & no one can honestly argue that point.

Jim, that sure is a mix! I guess it's really fun if you know all the references, parallels, and analogies. And I'm sure YOU DO! :)


The only thing I didn't like about the first book was all the heavy handed back story. It would have been a much better book if he hadn't explained so much, but apparently that's just me. You know how I like books that I have to think about. This Immortal is a pretty tough measuring stick.
;-)

I also know what you mean about names that are hard to pronounce (or have unusual spellings). They're hard to remember and do cause confusion when there are several characters like that.
PS-I guess Zelazny sets the bar pretty high. :)



I've had Hounded on my To Read list for a while, I've heard it's really good. I entered a giveaway for it, wish me luck!

Good going, Jackie. How do you find all these books?
I see that Pamela Freeman is an Australian author.
Thanks for the link to Full Circle.


Ah, yes, catalogs! I find a lot of stuff via catalogs. They're addictive. :) Here's a cute item I recently found in a hard copy catalog and asked Eddie to give me for Christmas:
http://www.expressionscatalog.com/ite...
He said it's too expensive. It is. But I like it. :) I love miniatures. Don't know why.

Maybe I should have said it's a pamphlet, 30 pages or so. Full of books! I love when it comes in the mail. I belong to SFBC and get one every month. I get 7 free books (I think) and I have to buy 4 books in 2 years. That's easy for me to do. I always fulfill my commitment long before the time is up.
This topic has been frozen by the moderator. No new comments can be posted.
Books mentioned in this topic
My Favorite Comedies in Music (other topics)My Favorite Intermissions: Lives of the Musical Greats and Other Facts You Never Knew You Were Missing (other topics)
Timebends: A Life (other topics)
My Name Is Mary Sutter (other topics)
Pomp and Circumstance (other topics)
More...
Authors mentioned in this topic
Arthur Miller (other topics)Victor Borge (other topics)
Robin Oliveira (other topics)
Michael J. Sullivan (other topics)
M.H. Clark (other topics)
More...
Nina, I'm sure that the book, In the Garden of Beasts: Love, Terror, and an American Family in Hitler's Berlin, will be an intriguing look behind the scenes as Hitler rose to power.
When I was in college, majoring in history, I did a paper on Hitler's rise to power. I went to the NYC public library and searched through their microfilms for the newspaper articles about Hitler around the 1930s, articles in which, with the power of hindsight, you could see the trouble brewing. Hitler said over and over what he aimed to do but not enough people worried about it, I suppose.
Good luck with your memoirs, Nina.