Chicks On Lit discussion
Other Hot Book Discussions
>
I re-read The Great Gatsby. Was I drunk before? *spoilers*
date
newest »


Kate Beaton sums up everything I remember/felt about Gatsby in this comic (WARNING: COUPLE OF BAD WORDS): http://harkavagrant.com/index.php?id=259
I WISH THAT GREEN LIGHT DIDN'T GIVE ME SEIZURES.

Personally I do need to like at least one character in a book or a movie to enjoy the experience. If I don't have someone to root for, someone that I hope turns out okay by the end, then I usually feel that the author has wasted my time.
I did like "Gatsby" the book as well as Gatsby the character. I didn't like the Redford movie at all, though, and have no intention of seeing the latest version.
The part I liked best was the little poem at the beginning, and I memorized it (although it's been so long that I can't trust my memory and will have to google it :) --
Then wear the gold hat, if that will move her;
If you can bounce high, bounce for her too,
Till she cry “Lover, gold-hatted, high-bouncing lover,
I must have you!”
I can't quite say what moves me about it, but I do love it.







I agree.

I know I liked it in High School but despised it from a few years ago. Just felt like everyone was whiny, over-privileged, pretentious A-holes. Very similar feelings that I had to my re-read of "Catcher in the Rye". Holden Caulfield. you just want to smack him, and tell him to quit whining about every. little. thing.


Any movie version that doesn't show us that has failed.
Shelley, Rain: A Dust Bowl Story
http://dustbowlpoetry.wordpress.com

Amitabh Bachchan - a Billion people, are not wrong. Oh, and Leo of course.



Haha. I remember not liking it that much because i rated it a 2/5, but remembering some of it, I feel like it was one of the better books I've read. I have yet to become disillusioned with a book I read that I liked and reread. I've reread Ender's game twice, and the Hobbit twice, and I'm still as in love as the first time.
Books mentioned in this topic
Rules of Civility (other topics)The Giving Tree (other topics)
The Catcher in the Rye (other topics)
Mrs. Dalloway (other topics)
Twilight (other topics)
More...
Browsing through this discussion your comment caught my eye and I have to respond since it was over-looked. Liking a book is not a requirement to acknowledge that it has literary merit to readers. Frankenstein should be categorized as a classic; it's one of the earliest examples of science-fiction as well as being an embodiment of the Gothic novel. It has controversial and thought-provoking themes for the time that still hold to today: Dr. Frankenstein playing God, his creation desiring love, and vengeance bringing with it only more misery.
Beyond the novel itself, learning about the reception it received provides insight into gender-bias faced by women writers. It was written under a pseudonym by Mary Shelley. The reviews were varied: some people loved it, some hated it. When it was revealed that a woman wrote the story a deluge of critiques emerged judging Shelley a knock-off writer, and the novel as dismissible and obviously faulted because of the gender of the author.
It is an incredible work -- even if you didn't enjoy it!