The 1700-1939 Book Club! discussion

This topic is about
On the Origin of Species
Past Side Reads
>
On the Origin of Species by Charles Darwin
date
newest »

message 1:
by
Jamie
(new)
Nov 11, 2011 02:59PM

reply
|
flag

I would like to read the book very much and it would be great if we could find some time which suits everybody interested.
My suggestion would be late January or early February? Let me know what you think.....

* Because it'd be Alfred Russel Wallace instead.

So are you guys planning on reading this around January/February? There is also interest in Hardy and Austen as side reads so I wanted to help organize reading schedules in case people are interested in reading this and one or both of those.
Oh if that doesn't work just let me know. I always start reading at the start date and discuss as I go. I can make it for February through March?

Well discussing from February-March seems better than January-February. This way if people want to start in January they can wait to discuss in February and it will give you time to get your book. (plus it will work with the other two side read so we don't have them all completely overlap. If this works just let me know. I'm just trying to help organize the schedule.

I have not heard anything from the library yet so I have just ordered a copy of the book:
http://www.bookdepository.co.uk/On-Or...
So February-March suits me just perfectly!


I am not sure which copy of the book you are reading but the one Im reading is the second edition and has a long intro.
One of the things which I liked in the intro is Darwin's focus on the very small things he found in the same species which are different and focus on those...instead of just saying..it does not matter these small differences. When they actually are the ones to proove how changes has been and are going on..just at a very slow pace. Sciencetist usually do not believe or didnt believe back then, that these small changes were significant.
I was prepared that Darwin's language is not dry at all and the book is read like a travel guide/discovery as I had read a part of a chapter some time back and liked his language very much.

It sounds like we have the same experience; that we, of course, know his conclusions but enjoy reading how he argues! :-)
I am a bit surprised how much he is writing to make sure his arguements stands, like he is really trying his best to convince everybody and take all areas into account (geology, biology, botanist and religion).
If I understood him correctly then one of his major arguements against God having created one of each species is just how many variations and what was it he called it..I forgot his words now...when a variation is becoming a species? He says that if God created all species once and no growth is taking place then why all the variations etc....
Also from a historical point of view, I find it interesting to try to imagine the time when his arguements and conclusion made such a big stir in the English society!
It seems so innocent and its hard to imagine that so little was known and catalogued back then, especially after having been to the Royal Botanic Garden at Kews outside London. They have the largest seed collection in the world now.

For example in chapter three: 'Owing to this struggle for life, any variation, however slight, and from whatever cause proceeding, if it be in any degree profitable to an individual of any species, in its infinitely complex relations to the other organic beings and to external nature, will tend to the preservation of that individual, and will generally be inherited by its offspring.' :-)
Somehow I find it hard to comment on the subject as I feel I know what he is talking about already but its great to see how it was first presented. Then again I am no science student. What do you think?