Watchers
discussion
Stephen King/Dean Koontz
date
newest »

message 51:
by
John
(new)
-
rated it 4 stars
Oct 09, 2012 08:03PM

reply
|
flag







I honestly haven't finished any of King's work. I always quit half-way. His world is just too ... icky ... for me, I guess. There isn't a whole lot of faith in mankind or hope for redemption in King's work. And Koontz is all about redemption.
I actually wrote a blog post about the differences between these two authors a while back. If you are interested, you can check it out here: http://blog.jefferymoulton.com/out-fr...


I absolutely LOVE the way Dean puts animals right into his story plots. So many stories would not have been as wonderful if it weren't for those well-written canines!! Particulary, intelligent retriever breeds :)

Yeah....especially true in the four hours I wasted reading King's "The Long Walk," I think it was called. Can't find it now...but ughhh....the ending made me want to PUKE! lol

I think the same thing about a lot of king's stuff......"
Yeah, Cell made my short list of King novels I enjoyed.

Koontz is a better writer.
King is a better story teller.
They both are great.
I completely agree.
My favorite Dean Koontz by far is Oddkins
But too many Stephen King books to name. All the Dark Tower books are good, and the way everything ties together is magical. I just love finding clues and Easter eggs in one book that reference back to another. I guess the one I've read the most is Eyes of the Dragon


Everyone HAS to read Life Expectancy. My favorite book of all time, and not just Koontz. It's not as scary as some-it's strength is its wonderful characters and of course suspense. It makes me laugh my head off.

Koontz-The Good Guy.
Both are inconsistent. King, Gerald's game. WTF? Koontz, Odd Thomas series. First book was great but after that it's a crap shoot. He either let's to much of his right wing god stuff in or writes another good one.
That being said both are great. King is more horror and Koontz is better with suspense.

My favorite Koontz book is actually the series, but it is Odd Thomas.
I know they both churn out the books and are some of the most well known writers, but I never did understand the big rivalry between fans.
They both have their strengths and weaknesses as writers and story tellers. They each have their own style and types of stories they create.
They are both very successful for the same reasons though. They both create good stories that are well written. I guess the sheer amount of work created also helps :-) I love them both for different reasons, but if I had to choose which one should keep writing and which one I would have to leave behind, I would definitely choose to read King over Koontz.
Especially lately (this is an old discussion) Koontz has been writing some really interesting stuff, very deep, and some what spiritual. King has been taking the darkness by the horns again.


And for me, Carrie is still King's best book.
all discussions on this book
|
post a new topic
Oddkins: A Fable for All Ages (other topics)
Strangers (other topics)
Watchers (other topics)
Lightning (other topics)
More...
Books mentioned in this topic
The Eyes of the Dragon (other topics)Oddkins: A Fable for All Ages (other topics)
Strangers (other topics)
Watchers (other topics)
Lightning (other topics)
More...