Science Fiction Aficionados discussion
Monthly Group Read Suggestions
>
A Change-up in how we do our reads
date
newest »


Of 28 that won only one of the awards, just 11 are Masterworks.
So by limiting ourselves to Masterworks we are losing the chance of about half of the best SF. But that is still a lot to go at...
(BTW Mark, I have an Excel spreadsheet I've compiled with this info on, if you need any help.)
very good point Sffgeek. starting in February, we will be expanding the list of potential nominees to include all Hugo & Nebula winners (in addition to the Masterworks).
and if you don't mind - i would love that info! if you don't mind sharing that excel spreadsheet, message me and i'll send you my email address. if you do mind... no worries.
and if you don't mind - i would love that info! if you don't mind sharing that excel spreadsheet, message me and i'll send you my email address. if you do mind... no worries.
The idea tossed around in the thread this was discussed in was to use Nebula-Hugo winners, or other list methods of having books to nominate. Mark monday has graciously agrees to compile a list, but for our first 'classics' read, we will nominate off the Gollanz Sci-Fi Masterworks list.
Hopefully this will bring an even greater level of enjoyment to our classic reads!
The list can be found here:
https://www.worldswithoutend.com/list...