ROBUST discussion
If you own more than one Kindle, there's something new afoot that could affect you...
date
newest »


When my computer is turned off, the documents are secure. When those documents are all over the web - they are at risk 24/7.
I suppose I shouldn't care - they are just books, after all. But it's got SQUICK written all over it.

I'd add a commercial consideration, Sierra. In the 1990s I had my computer broken into by a bunch of computer nerds specifically to steal a particular manuscript from it. They published a part of it, heavily altered; I had no alternative but to tell the publisher we should withdraw the book; we split the loss, but I doubt today's corporate publishers would be so agreeable. More generally, even if one is not a pornographer, some first drafts could be embarrassing, and have financial implications, and that's before we get to libel, which in several countries (France springs instantly to mind, but in the UK too, if more rarely) can have serious criminal overtones.

How are they going to feel when 'the Cloud' eats their documents?
It is a VERY nasty thought.

I still want to get a kindle though. I'll just be sure to be very particular about what I put on it.

What they've done is re-invented the old 'dumb terminal' using the PC, or in this case, the Kindle, as the 'host' machine while the brains of the machines is 'out there somewhere' on the internet.
As far as I'm concerned there is absolutely NO security, no protection from hackers - and you don't control your own data, someone else's computer does.


Originally I’d thought the $79 Kindle shipped with a touchscreen, because there isn’t a keyboard built into its plastic frame — just an on-screen keyboard. But apparently there’s no way to actually type letters into that onscreen keyboard — at least, not using the “touch-typing” that we’re used to with other devices. Instead, Amazon pulls up a picture of a keyboard, then lets you slowly nudge your controller key (up, down, or sideways) to gradually move a highlight across the keyboard — one key at a time — until it’s finally highlighting the next letter you want to type. (And then you press the controller one more time, to select that letter.)
So its sole USP (unique selling point, for those with less street cred than me) is that it is smaller and cheaper?
Where the Kindle has always fallen flat is firstly in the pisspoor programming and secondly in the general input/output area. (I like the side button controls on the K3. They're just right for a *reader*.) So this new Kindle makes what was bad already worse. I don't understand why Sierra should want it, except if she's a rollover for whatever's new.
My Android smartphone cost half that much (on a sale -- it was the second cheapest phone at Carphone Warehouse) and is a satisfactory incidental reader with all kinds of other facilities including fullscreen fingertip handwriting recognition that works well. (I've been into handwriting recognition since before the Newton.) I don't think that for twice the price I would take a cut-down Kindle... Even the wretched keyboard of the K3 is better than nothing.
Where the Kindle has always fallen flat is firstly in the pisspoor programming and secondly in the general input/output area. (I like the side button controls on the K3. They're just right for a *reader*.) So this new Kindle makes what was bad already worse. I don't understand why Sierra should want it, except if she's a rollover for whatever's new.
My Android smartphone cost half that much (on a sale -- it was the second cheapest phone at Carphone Warehouse) and is a satisfactory incidental reader with all kinds of other facilities including fullscreen fingertip handwriting recognition that works well. (I've been into handwriting recognition since before the Newton.) I don't think that for twice the price I would take a cut-down Kindle... Even the wretched keyboard of the K3 is better than nothing.

Since I now have the new, smaller Kindle I can say that the virtual keyboard is not a disappointment to me. It's large, easy to see (which the old Kindle's keyboard is not), and it was much faster for me to use. Probably someone who does well at texting, which I don't, will want the Kindle Touch or Fire.
I've seen complaints posted about the placement of the controls, but for me the placement is a big improvement. I also love the size and the new color. It doesn't have everything the keyboard version has, but what's missing is nothing I'll miss, and I think I'll use it more than the keyboard because I like the feel of it in my hand.
I'm on the fence about whether I want a cover. If I get one, it'll be because (as Andre pointed out) I'm a sucker for whatever Amazon puts in front of me.

"IHS iSuppli, which analyzed the component and manufacturing costs, estimated that each Kindle Fire costs $209 to make, which would mean Amazon would take a $10 hit on every device it sells at $199. But ElectronicsFeed.com says the real payoff isn’t even the digital content that Amazon can sell, because of the new device, but the sale of physical goods—shoes, clothing, furniture, home décor, electronics and much more—that make up the major part of its business."
-- http://www.manilastandardtoday.com/in...
-- http://www.manilastandardtoday.com/in...

I don't understand the technology, but from what has been explained on Amazon's product page, it looks like Silk will benefit those who do wish to go to third-party sites because it'll be faster than surfing on some other gadgets.


As for the 'cloud', it looks as if it is the way of the future - the new 4S iphone announced recently uses cloud f'instance, and this forum uses the technology. I doubt it is any less secure than what we store on our own computers. Does it give me twinges? Yes. Should we be prudent in our use? As with everything in life, yes. My concern is if we have the infrastrucure to support the explosion of info travelling the skies. Here we have the latest technology, my broadband has always been much less unstable than my friends in the UK for instance, but still the internet was dodgy and slow all summer and has not improved much with the kiddies going back to school.
It's all here to stay. We can use it or not, just as my otherwise rather fearless intellectual brother chooses not to embrace the internet because he remembers the old (25 years ago forgodssake) horror stories of folks using computers and he is still afraid if he hits the wrong button he will crash the system. Or it will blow up and kill him or something.

Dianne's link is a calm display of what the new settings/email options mean, but there is the other side of it. Amazon's set up can result in unintended consequences that could be quite serious for some people. My opinion is that they need to change it and fast, or at least notify Kindle owners that their personal documents are no longer going to be treated in the same way. Some forum member discovered the change and posted it, but I doubt that many Kindle owners hang out in the forum. I know Kindle owners who look at me blankly when I mention the forum. They had no idea it existed.
In my case, if I send something to my Kindle, I don't want it showing up on my three Kindles along with my daughter's, granddaughter's, grandson's, and two friends' Kindles. Right now I don't have to worry about that because all but two of those Kindles will have email addresses all their own because they were on the account prior to the change. But two of my Kindles, one of which has yet to arrive, will both receive whatever I email to the single address Amazon's forcing me to use on them. While that does nothing to harm my privacy, it does put a layer of inconvenience on top of owning more than one new Kindle because I'll have to delete twice when I send once. I can click a spot that will keep one of those Kindles from receiving the emails but that means I'd have to go back into my settings and unclick it when I want it to receive emails, and I'd have to remember which Kindles are enabled. It just seems like Amazon didn't think this through, or if they did, they had a purpose that is not yet clear to me.
Excellent analysis, Sierra.
Can't resist remarking that Apple doesn't make silly errors like taking away people's privacy.
Can't resist remarking that Apple doesn't make silly errors like taking away people's privacy.


I see the convenience of one email addy for all my Kindle devices and the option to enable or not to each device. I cannot see that as any more inconvenient than sending documents to several email addys if that is my wish. Perhaps I'm just not using my Kindle the way others are, but I cannot imagine sending my shopping list to my Kindle. Though that could change with the Fire. But even then I would think I would use an app like Evernote (another cloud-based program).
Andre, why would Apple's cloud be any more secure than anyone else's?

By the way, I do send my shopping list to my Kindle, and my appointment times/dates, and things I see on the Internet that I want to read from the device instead of my computer, etc.
Sharon, Amazon's cloud is ipso facto insecure because there is no privacy between devices on the same account but not in the same hands. Apple would never in a million years make a silly error like that.


Patricia wrote: "If your Kindle is cumbersome, you NEED the new tiny Kindle. Thin, light, and easy to use. Bezos should give me a commission for all the selling I do."
I think the keyboard Kindle K3 is light enough not to be noticed. and I like the size, with enough space to hold it securely when I read it in my bath, which is the only place I still use it.
I think the keyboard Kindle K3 is light enough not to be noticed. and I like the size, with enough space to hold it securely when I read it in my bath, which is the only place I still use it.


The kindle isn't bad. It is a Consumer Device - made to make it easier to spend money.


I am sorry for your lose, Patricia. Cancer is a killer. I have seen it take some very special people in a painful way. I fear that one of my life long friends, like a brother to me may have it. He wants it to be kept quiet so I have to respect his wishes but I am so saddened by it.
Patricia wrote: "Dying of pancreatic cancer is a terrible way to go. I lost the love of my life to that."
That's rough.
That's rough.

I'm sorry about Steve Jobs. All cancers are awful, but I too have seen first-hand that pancreatic is one of the nastiest. No one should have to suffer like that. My heart goes out to you Patricia. No one should have to watch anyone suffer like that.
Margie, I sincerely hope you are mistaken. Sending out prayers...

The above link details Amazon's new way of dealing with those documents we email to our Kindles. There are a couple discussions going on in the Kindle forum about the changes, but this blog sums it up on a single page complete with visuals. Let your imagination fill in how this change might bring woe to some Kindle owners.