Q&A with Alma Katsu discussion

This topic is about
The Taker
Writing, Process and the Path to Publication
date
newest »

message 1:
by
Alma
(new)
-
added it
Sep 30, 2011 10:12AM

reply
|
flag

Destiny wrote: "I wanted to know did you feel rushed during this whole process? And also was it an easy transition for you getting your hard work published?"
I didn't feel rushed writing the book, but like many writers, I made the common mistake of querying agents and talking to editors before the book was ready, because I was anxious to be published.
I'm feeling rushed now, getting the second book ready for publication. The Taker took 10 yrs to write, and there's less than 2 years to get The Reckoning finished, and then I'll have about 9 months to finish The Descent, and I'm sweating that already!
I didn't feel rushed writing the book, but like many writers, I made the common mistake of querying agents and talking to editors before the book was ready, because I was anxious to be published.
I'm feeling rushed now, getting the second book ready for publication. The Taker took 10 yrs to write, and there's less than 2 years to get The Reckoning finished, and then I'll have about 9 months to finish The Descent, and I'm sweating that already!


While I see from the other threads this took quite a while but I am still wondering: vivid imagination; fascination with this topic matter; always inside of you? I could go on but will let you answer this one.
So this is the first of the three I am gathering. Glad to be in on it and I see there is a twist at the end which all good series should have.
Thank you for putting this book in my hands.
Poof wrote: "So this is my first time on goodreads in a discussion but THE TAKER is too powerful not too. I am still in the midst of the read but since the beginning I have been struck by someone being able to ..."
Wow, I'm glad you're so taken with the story. I've been accused of having a vivid imagination, yes.
The Taker started with a short story I'd written decades ago. The kernel of the story was in there--a love that could never be that lasted for eternity (real upbeat, huh?) but the story itself changed and morphed over time.
I was also interested in magic. I read any "real" book of magic I could get my hands on. For this book, I studied up on alchemy, too. The question of what is responsible for Adair's abilities is purposely left ambiguous--alchemy or magic, or God or the devil--though it's answered by the last book in the trilogy.
Regarding your question of whether the story was always inside me: while I was writing the book, I told myself that it was just a story, a tumultuous tragic love story that had nothing to do with me or my life. It wasn't until afterwards, as I was trying to understand why the characters did the things they did, that I realized the story really dealt with all the big issues lurking in my subconscious.
I hope that's the kind of answer you were looking for.
Wow, I'm glad you're so taken with the story. I've been accused of having a vivid imagination, yes.
The Taker started with a short story I'd written decades ago. The kernel of the story was in there--a love that could never be that lasted for eternity (real upbeat, huh?) but the story itself changed and morphed over time.
I was also interested in magic. I read any "real" book of magic I could get my hands on. For this book, I studied up on alchemy, too. The question of what is responsible for Adair's abilities is purposely left ambiguous--alchemy or magic, or God or the devil--though it's answered by the last book in the trilogy.
Regarding your question of whether the story was always inside me: while I was writing the book, I told myself that it was just a story, a tumultuous tragic love story that had nothing to do with me or my life. It wasn't until afterwards, as I was trying to understand why the characters did the things they did, that I realized the story really dealt with all the big issues lurking in my subconscious.
I hope that's the kind of answer you were looking for.