Heaven is for Real
discussion
Not so amazed
date
newest »


Maybe I should write a book - after all my son was so passionate about the whole thing....




Check out my webcomic: http://reddkaiman.blogspot.com/2013/0...

What does that have to do with the book? I believe in Christ, and don't like the book. I believe Christ gave me my mind, and my mind read this book and went "this is so hokey."




I agree completely with you. It really upsets me that this preacher will now make money off a movie based on this book and that he has made money off it at all

I have to say that I agree that if Paul was taken to the third heaven and wasn't told by God to put it in the Bible so that we would know what it was like, and he was actually was not permitted to tell what he saw, than why would Colton come bearing a message of heaven? Personally I think that if God really wanted us to know what heaven was like he would have inspired the writers of the Bible to describe it.
Oh, and the reference to Paul being caught up to the third heaven is 2nd Corinthians 12:1-5

This book is bunk. Sorry, but it is. It's just the pathetic last ditch effort of people to let themselves think they are going to have a huge family reunion one day in heaven, surrounded by harp playing angels riding on unicorns.
Really sad.


The truth is whether you believe the book or not, it's the content that matters. I truly believe that God can and will doing anything that he thinks will help draw us closer to him. I respect all of your opinions and the events in the book may or may not have happened, but it seems to me that everyone is accusing this pastor of lying. You have no proof that he did or didn't make it all up. Unless God has specifically told you, in your heart, that it is wrong, it isn't our place to judge. Just enjoy the book! Whether you believe it or not is your concern and it seems to me that we're all trying to convince each other of our opinions.I know each of us are own are own spiritual journey at the moment so maybe a quick prayer asking God to show you his opinion on it might be a good idea.

For example, in my opinion this was a fantastic book because it seemed sincere and miracles happened. Just from my point of view, it seemed real.


It also says in Psalms 37:29 that the righteous themselves will possess THE EARTH and will reside forever UPON IT. Not in heaven.
The power of suggestion is very strong with children. This child had a very real dream, as did Dorothy in the Wizard of Oz.
The myth of the soul living on in heaven after death may be comforting to some, and that is a good thing, in a crazy world where we all could use some comfort. But it's just not true, according to the Bible.

"Let not your heart be troubled; you believe in God, believe also in Me. In My Father's house are many mansions; if it were not so, I would have told you. I go to prepare a place for you. And if I go and prepare a place for you, I will come again and receive you to Myself; that where I am, there you may be also." ~John 14:1-3
Jesus wants us to be where He is and in Acts 7:56 it says, "' . . .I see the heaven opened and the Son of Man standing at the right hand of God!'"
The Bible clearly states in Matthew 5:16, " . . . that they may see your good works and glorify your Father in heaven." So that shows that God is in heaven, with Jesus at his right hand and Jesus is preparing a place for us there with him! Isn't that great!?


Keep on doing your good work Aspen.
Jesus loves all of you soo very much.

But why does the Bible say in Psalms 37:29 that the righteous themselves will possess THE EARTH and will reside forever UPON IT?"
That is a quote. If we are all going to heaven, is that an untrue scripture?
Everyone is using the old cop-outs "Jesus loves you", choose his path, etc. rather than actually addressing the issue I've presented.
I guess your fantasy world is more palatable to you than facing reality - just as it is to the family who wrote this ridiculous book.

I don't see where you answered my question - you speak here of Jesus standing beside God. So are they the same person, i.e. part of a Trinity? If so is someone standing beside himself?
Or are they Father and Son? Two different entities? Can't have it both ways.....
I am willing to bet that no one will respond, either to this or to my post immediately before. Because if you answer logically it flies in the face of some pretty basic, although incorrect, Christian teachings, doesn't it?


In John, for example, Jesus does not interact with God; he interacts with the Father. So, God can be both Father and Son. This is not the portrayal of the other gospels.

Sorry I didn't answer in so long (vacation). Actually, we CAN have it both ways. God is so amazing and powerful and mighty that we can't understand everything about Him. I mean really, He created the heavens and the earth! Our understanding is limited. God is both. He is part of a trinity and yet He and Christ are the same. I know it's confusing, but it's something we have to take with faith knowing that he's got it under control.
It seems to me that you're the one getting off topic. I thought we were discussing whether it was possible or not for this kid to go to heaven! You have to admit though, even if you don't believe the scripture I quoted above, it does seem to answer your questions. Please give me a little time to better understand and address your question about the scripture you quoted. I think I understand what the problem is, but I'd hate to say the wrong thing here, considering it is a perspective-changing conversation. I'll be back in a couple of days. Thanks so much for the questions! You seem genuinely interested in this topic :D (By the way, calling the book ridiculous doesn't make your argument seem any stronger) :)

The way you have worded that perfectly, God and Jesus are one, although I am still understanding that concepts. Again great job on wording the concept.
God Bless


According to what I've read in the Bible, Jesus does indeed say that "I and the father are one." But he is assuming that those reading it will have enough common sense to know that he means "one" in thought, in action, in belief. Not literally. That does not make sense.
Right after Jesus made the statement about being "one" with his Father, he told his apostles who were gathered around him "we are all one just as I and the Father are one." So, were all of the apostles and Jesus literally the same entity? Of course not. They were one in purpose, belief, etc.
The next argument is that Jesus said "if you've seen me, you've seen the Father also". I've heard it said about my son and my husband "if you've seen one, you've seen the other one". It means that they look, act, think, believe alike. It's a common expression.
A thinking, reasoning person would not believe that he meant they are literally the same. Again, it doesn't make sense.
Jesus always spelled out very clearly the things he wanted his followers to know. If indeed there is a Trinity, don't you think that the word "Trinity" would at least be found somewhere in the Bible? Wouldn't Jesus have come right out and said, "I am part of a triune entity made up of myself, God and the Holy Spirit"? Or something like that?
He didn't. He said "I am going my way to the Father because THE FATHER IS GREATER THAN I AM". Not "I am going my way to the Father, who is actually still myself, but not..."
The Trinity came about when the Catholic Church wanted to convert some pagans (Druids, I think) and the Druids were ok with it, except they would not give up the triune Druid false god they worshipped. So the Catholics said, that's ok, we'll just incorporate the triune God-Head doctrine into our own teachings, call it the Trinity, then we can all be happy little Christians. This is in the encyclopedia, I am not making it up.
And I don't buy the "it's all a mystery, we weren't meant to understand" business. God gave us the Bible, with all it's history, wisdom, lessons to be learned. He told us all about himself, his son, his prophets - He wanted us to understand. Jesus did not preach that everything was one big mystery and that the average person couldn't understand. He spoke to the common people, teaching them so that they would know his Father's purpose.
The "mystery" was put there by the churches, particularly the Catholic church, to discourage people from actually reading the Bible for themselves and possibly discovering that their teachings were not Biblical.
As far as everyone going to heaven, here are my thoughts, as I understand my reading of the Scriptures: (MY understanding, using my free will and common sense, not blindly following church doctrine.)
"The righteous themselves will possess THE EARTH and they shall reside forever UPON IT". Psalms 37:29
"The dead are conscious of nothing at all - when they die, on that day their thoughts do perish". Ecclesiastes 9:5.
"The soul that is sinning, it itself will DIE" Ezekiel 18:4 (not live on somewhere else).
John 5:28 & 29 describes a resurrection of all the dead from their memorial tombs. If they are still in their tombs, how are they also in heaven? And if they are in heaven immediately upon dying, then why would they need to be resurrected?
Just because you have been taught something all your life doesn't mean it is true. Think for yourself and come to a logical conclusion.
Yes, this may be "off the topic" but it is worth discussing.

pretty much unfortunetly :-/ i was disapointed

all discussions on this book
|
post a new topic
That could be possible, but would a 4 year old tell a dad all these things bout angels singing to him and God sitting him on his lap. Would people tell him that? IF you read through the whole book you would know that Colton talked about experiances higher than life that no one could have put into his mind. This book was God's way of speaking to us even through a little 4 year old.