Amazon Kindle discussion
Book Related Banter
>
Book sequel ?
date
newest »




For example if you read paranormal romances there is a series that is highly recommended often called the Carpathian series and I read a few and decided NO I don't want to read twenty more of these LOL (for various reasons, they weren't horrible, just didn't want to do it).
Very occasionally if the series is very short- say around three books vs 5-15. I'll buy it outright. Especially if it's an author I consistently love. I don't do this often because, again, even with a beloved author, they can be inconsistent.


That often doesn't work out well, as most of the series that I enjoy are in the fantasy genre, and there's a huge tendency for those authors to nosedive after the first few books. If I've gone 5-6 books into a series I'll often finish it out of stubbornness rather than real enjoyment.



For a long series I don't usually have the cash in hand to buy them all at once. For the few of those I've gotten into I've scoured used bookstores until I'm at least up to date and decide on further entries book by book. I really have only done this with Pern and Darkover, and the Bond books (real Ian Fleming only, please) and the Quiller series of spy novels.
I prefer standalone books, or at least ones that don't completely rely on your having read all of the others not to be lost in the storyline.
This has been on my mind for a while now, since I am the type of person that will buy all the books even when I don't know if I will end up liking them. This happened with the Fallen series by Lauren Kate. They ended up improving, but I know that's not always the case! :)
What do you think?