Mostly Harmless (Hitchhiker's Guide to the Galaxy, #5) Mostly Harmless discussion


250 views
Did you read #5?

Comments Showing 1-14 of 14 (14 new)    post a comment »
dateUp arrow    newest »

Phillip Casteel I've run into so many Douglas Adams fans who have not read Mostly Harmless. They get the joke about 42, but don't seem to know its ultimate meaning (revealed at the end of book 5). Is there a reason for this? I came to Adams late so I may have missed something. Is it not routinely included in Hitchhiker collections?
Thanks


Jamie I liked it. I got a big kick out of Arthur Dent as the Sandwich Maker and everyone on that planet thinking he's a genius for inventing it.

I wouldn't say it's the best in the series, but Adams tends to ramble and flow from one seemingly unrelated idea to the next. Mostly Harmless just kept it going.

A lot of fans hated it or didn't bother reading it which is a shame because they missed the bit where Adams conceptualized the iphone 15 years before it was actually invented.


Will I read it, and enjoyed it; however, like Jamie mentioned, it is not the best in the series. I don't understand why Adams fans wouldn't read it though. It is more Adams zaniness that we all love.


Marcus Steffanci It was decent. I'm having the strong urge to revisit the whole series one of these days and then read Coiffer's book and see if it does the series any justice


Phillip Casteel Jamie wrote: "I liked it. I got a big kick out of Arthur Dent as the Sandwich Maker and everyone on that planet thinking he's a genius for inventing it.

I wouldn't say it's the best in the series, but Adams ..."


I really liked the sandwich maker aspechoof the story. To find your place in the cosmos with such a honored craft. Brilliant.


M.j. Holmes Coiffer's book does no justice. It is a POS. He rehashes the sole appearance of Thor as the only person who 'might' be able to kill Wowbagger the infinitely prolonged. There was also some crap added about some commune or living community on a planet...
Avoid it if at all possible.

-M-
§


message 7: by Haley (new)

Haley Yes, and I most certainly enjoyed it. I've read "Dirk Gentley's Holistic Detective Agency" as well. That book was splendid! I've yet to read the sequel. Once I read that there will be nothing left of his for me to read. :(


message 8: by Preston (new)

Preston No. There can only be four books in a trilogy.


E.D. Lynnellen Fish, fish, fish. It's always "fish" with you people.


Htb2050 I read it because it was supposed to be the same continuation of story but I was surprised to find that almost everything was different. All of my favorite characters weren't there. So, I guess it was just okay kind of book to finish the series.


Matthew Gaffen Jamie wrote: "I liked it. I got a big kick out of Arthur Dent as the Sandwich Maker and everyone on that planet thinking he's a genius for inventing it.

I wouldn't say it's the best in the series, but Adams ..."


I loved Colin too, he was awesome!

The book has a definitely melancholy bent, and the ending made me quite sad; it almost felt like a child knocking over his building blocks in frustration. However there was still enough of Adams' dry wit in this book to make it well worth reading for me


message 12: by Ben (new) - rated it 2 stars

Ben I remember really enjoying it until the end, which really really disappointed me. To the point where I've only read it the once (whereas I have read and enjoyed the preceding books many many times over).


message 13: by [deleted user] (new)

That is weird. It might be the big publication gap. Don't know.


message 14: by Joe (new) - rated it 3 stars

Joe I hadn't read it until this year despite being a big fan of the series for a long time. I can see why it's ignored but it's still a worthy read.


back to top