Goodreads Librarians Group discussion
Archived
>
Bechdel Test
date
newest »
newest »
The Bechdel Test is harder to apply to books than to movies, unless it's a multiple POV book. If you have a male protagonist and a first or third person POV, chances are you will always fail the Bechdel Test.I often fail the reverse Bechdel Test for this reason.
On the one hand I like the idea of having some way of discovering whether a book has rounded female characters. On the other hand, I suspect the results might be massively skewed for anything but multiple POV books.
You could say that the point of the Bechdel Test is to simply make you ask yourself why so many stories have a cast of fully rounded characters, and The Girl.It's by no means an ultimate test of a good/bad movie or story. But it's a way of looking at the stories we're telling, and questioning that disparity.
Which seems to me to be an appropriate thing to include in one's review, if this is an issue of import to you.
Good news! Most of my fantasy books pass this test with flying colours. (That's the correct spelling by the way. I'm not American).
The problem with the Bechdel test is that it's a highly flawed criteria, what if they only talk about clothes/shopping/celebrities/cooking...?The test tells me nothing of the importance a female character has for/within the story or which attitude the author shows/has shown to her.
It has its value in making readers observe (gender) mechanics more closely, but it's by no means a good criteria, IMHO.







So many books/movies/whatever Do Not do this, and I just want to make it easier to search this info.
Thanks for considering!