ROBUST discussion
Book Talk & Exchange of Views
>
Defining the missing age -- are we missing some good books?

Thanks for the title, A Country Such As This. I can still remember sitting in my dorm room listening to the draft numbers being called over the radio, girls writing daily letters to their guys in the service, visiting my boyfriend who started out in the Honor Guard in DC and ended up airlifting the wounded out of Nam to Germany. It was a very turbulent time as it was for my Mom when Dad was serving during WWII.
Webb was a serving Marine officer. He knows what he's talking about. Later he he was Secretary of the Navy under Reagan and he's now a Democratic Senator. His characters when we first meet them are serving in the Honor Guard in DC IIRC... Webb knows what he's talking about. One of those books that stays with you, for ringing so true.

As for things that defined my age, call it the '90s and '00's, well, nothing is immediately springing to mind. Of course if I read any real world set modern day fiction I might have an easier time thinking of something.
Bridget Jones diary? All about fags, diets, and men? Sex and the City and the rise and fall of Chick lit life? How depressing.

For me it was the decline of the Auto industry that turned my home town in an empty hulk in the Rust Belt. I was 21 and the poverty was grinding. The only reason my family had any money at all was the business.
That economic disaster didn't end for me until 1992 when I came to Kentucky and got a 'real job' with wages and benefits.

A book that I have reread a few times is The Man by Irving Wallace. http://www.goodreads.com/book/show/55.... I reread it after the US elected Obama and while the storyline is clearly dated, the mentality of the people is not.
Irving Wallace, another unfairly forgotten writer, simply because he was popular, big themes and scope.
About Obama, I took a look at him, the compleat manufactured machine politician, above all intent on offending no one, zero positive impulse, and concluded he has neither the brains nor the will to break free of the net of restrictions the American Constitution (correctly in my view) places on an American President. To put it in understandable terms for the folk I was writing to, I forecast that the limmo liberals would be fed up with *their* president before his first term was out. That turned out to be an understatement! The man has nothing going for him except that he's black, and the Nobel Committee fixed that ruling aspect of his presidency forever in everyone's minds by giving him the Nobel Peace Prize for just being black.
About Obama, I took a look at him, the compleat manufactured machine politician, above all intent on offending no one, zero positive impulse, and concluded he has neither the brains nor the will to break free of the net of restrictions the American Constitution (correctly in my view) places on an American President. To put it in understandable terms for the folk I was writing to, I forecast that the limmo liberals would be fed up with *their* president before his first term was out. That turned out to be an understatement! The man has nothing going for him except that he's black, and the Nobel Committee fixed that ruling aspect of his presidency forever in everyone's minds by giving him the Nobel Peace Prize for just being black.
It's a sub-category of "Worthless, but Politically Correct and Uber-Trendy". Falls into the same category as giving the IPCC and Fat Al a Nobel Prize just before the whole world catches on that Global Warming is a Trillion Dollar Swindle.
Hey now don't be so harsh on the Global Warming die hards ;)
While I mostly agree with you on Obama, I said to friends at the time of his election that he would never be elected for a second term purely because of the fiasco by the Bushes that he inherited. No matter what he did or what he tried to do, he'd never be able to fix that particular brand of stupid in his term of office. He has a lot to prove just because he is a black man in a white man's world.
While I mostly agree with you on Obama, I said to friends at the time of his election that he would never be elected for a second term purely because of the fiasco by the Bushes that he inherited. No matter what he did or what he tried to do, he'd never be able to fix that particular brand of stupid in his term of office. He has a lot to prove just because he is a black man in a white man's world.

While I mostly agree with you on Obama, I said to friends at the time of his election that he would never be elected for a second ter..."
I'm fairly sure the Bush mess has nothing to do with his re-election chances. He has a vision of the good that's at odds with a lot of America. (Maybe not most of America, but a lot and an especially vocal lot who votes.)
He could have been elected with a booming economy and no wars and the health care debacle would have sunk his chances with a loud segment of the voting population. And if he had had a booming economy and no wars to deal with, he would have gone even further into the social issues, which would have motivated more of the right-wing stay at homes to get up and vote against him.
Also, bear in mind, he wasn't in office for long, but he voted in favor of almost everything Bush did that made things worse. Basically every lame-brained idea that Bush had in his last two years, Obama voted in favor of. He helped to make the mess he inherited.
I don't think Obama ever had any intention, and certainly no capability, of fixing anything; it's as if his urge to pose as President is far stronger than his understanding of what a president does. I feel sorry for him. It wasn't so much that much was expected from him -- the man is after all the President of the United States, so a great deal should be expected from him. It was that his own supporters clearly brought with them entirely unreasonable expectations. It is not the Republicans who doomed Obama to a fall, nor any of the usual bogeymen (Wall Street gave big for Obama...), it is the so-called liberals who in their gaderene rush to self-gratification can't be bothered to learn how American government works. Which brings us back to what the president can and cannot do; in that sense, the last president to walk on water was Lyndon Johnson, who manipulated the Houses of Congress like finger-puppets and was probably the best-hated Democrat ever by the so-called liberals. Yet Johnson managed to ram through his Great Society, which is by a country mile the most successful social legislative programme of any Democratic president, ever. I don't mean the mess now, I mean just ramming it through into legislation after all the years it stalled under the empty-headed suit-rack Kennedy. (Now if Obama had a Bobby who was less interested in being vindictive to people who sneered at his gangster dad, and more interested in social policy, than yer akshul Robert F., he'd breeze into a second term and possibly into a posterity as a great man. Even a Kissinger would be good. Any nutcutter would be good. Those guys are in desperate need of someone to tell them what they think.) The next most successful president after Johnson is Abraham Lincoln, the Republican who freed the slaves, and then the prissy engineer Hoover, another Republican, whose semi-Keynesian works and deficit spending programme the now-sainted but in life frivolous Roosevelt paid lip service to, so that Hoover's policies (formed in Balkan relief expeditions -- history *does* repeat itself!) served four terms, his own and three by Roosevelt.
A good shortish book of 20th century history is Modern Times: The World from the Twenties to the Nineties. Johnson was Bertrand Russell's spearcarrier in the mathematician's marshmallow old age, so he was a guaranteed card-carrying leftie; he's also the most interesting of the Catholic writers, but he has such respect for the meaning of words that he cannot quite bring himself to lie. So his books crackle with tension.
A good shortish book of 20th century history is Modern Times: The World from the Twenties to the Nineties. Johnson was Bertrand Russell's spearcarrier in the mathematician's marshmallow old age, so he was a guaranteed card-carrying leftie; he's also the most interesting of the Catholic writers, but he has such respect for the meaning of words that he cannot quite bring himself to lie. So his books crackle with tension.

Also agree with Kat about pre-coffee.

He's not hard-ass enough to make Congress respect him. He's too honest, too inexperienced, and too civilized for the screaming ID10Ts he's been pitted against.
Poor schumuck.
Interesting that Kathleen Valentine's friend Maureen in a long post that appeared on my Facebook News, which of course I can't now find, said roughly the same thing as I did, with additional examples to make my points, and added the claim that Obama has achieved more in half a term than Roosevelt did in three. She's another card-carrying Catholic liberal, but she also happens to be a writer of history, so she has considerable credibility. (I probably got some of the background for my opinions above from one of her books without recognizing her name...)
Even more interesting was one silly woman saying Obama betrayed those who voted for him, by staying in Afghanistan and institutionalizing Guantanamo after he promised to pull out the troops and close Guantanomo. It's that sort of single-cause "liberal" who bedevil American politics. She trusted the man to be chief executive of the most powerful nation on earth -- and then she wants to dictate policy to him! This is symptomatic of the way most American politicians now are elected, as a logrolling exercise, putting together enough one to five per cent groups of single-cause interest to make some kind of a majority, people who think they elected the President to do their single thing and bugger the rest of the world including every other American. If a shareholder ever spoke to me like Americans think they can speak to their President, I would have rolled over him and his shareholding, no matter how big, like a panzer brigade.
I wake up beautiful and chipper, cracking a joke. Those with clear consciences do, I'm told. Until then, I thought everyone did.
Even more interesting was one silly woman saying Obama betrayed those who voted for him, by staying in Afghanistan and institutionalizing Guantanamo after he promised to pull out the troops and close Guantanomo. It's that sort of single-cause "liberal" who bedevil American politics. She trusted the man to be chief executive of the most powerful nation on earth -- and then she wants to dictate policy to him! This is symptomatic of the way most American politicians now are elected, as a logrolling exercise, putting together enough one to five per cent groups of single-cause interest to make some kind of a majority, people who think they elected the President to do their single thing and bugger the rest of the world including every other American. If a shareholder ever spoke to me like Americans think they can speak to their President, I would have rolled over him and his shareholding, no matter how big, like a panzer brigade.
I wake up beautiful and chipper, cracking a joke. Those with clear consciences do, I'm told. Until then, I thought everyone did.

Clear Conscience? You? (cough, cough, cough) People with a clear conscience have crappy memories. LOL
I agree with the coffee respect thing in the morning. For me, a triple espresso. I don't wake up until at least 4 cups have been inhaled.
Patricia wrote: "I miss the days when I still did things that would weigh on my conscience."
Don't we all?
Don't we all?

Just noticed something (boy, is this ever off topic): text-to-speech is now enabled on my Random House books. That's something I fought for when the blind were lobbying the Authors Guild. RH initially agreed to enable the feature when authors requested it, then changed their mind. Now they've changed again, and based on a search I did through RH books in the Kindle Store, it appears to be across the board. All the RH books I clicked on had the feature enabled. It looks like they've resolved the audio rights issue, deciding that text-to-speech doesn't meet the definition of an audio book. I checked one author who held onto her audio rights to sell separately and text-to-speech is also available on her titles. Haven't seen it discussed here, so I don't know if any of you use that feature (it's certainly nothing like listening to an audio book), but I use it from time to time.
It's the least offensive part of my body. I don't talk about the rest. :)
That is awesome if it is something they've done across the board. I myself have never listened to an audio book, don't need that right now. I prefer listening to music when I drive. It's the only place I don't get trashed for listening to what I do.
That is awesome if it is something they've done across the board. I myself have never listened to an audio book, don't need that right now. I prefer listening to music when I drive. It's the only place I don't get trashed for listening to what I do.
My mother used to love listening to my books on tape. Said she could close her eyes and imagine the scene. She bought them from Books for the Blind by wheelbarrow load to give away to blind people and thus discovered her affinity for audiobooks.
I find audiobooks distracting, unless produced as a long stream of poetry, like Ulysses read by proper Irish actors, in which case I listen to it as a sort of wall of music just like Mozart, and happily do something else all the while.
I find audiobooks distracting, unless produced as a long stream of poetry, like Ulysses read by proper Irish actors, in which case I listen to it as a sort of wall of music just like Mozart, and happily do something else all the while.

I tend to fall asleep when listening to an audio book, but the book keeps playing so I lose my place.

LOL - I have the right to exploit my own adventures.

Meanwhile, in ereading news: Microsoft gives up on Microsoft Reader:
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2011/08...

So, If I wake up beautiful and chipper in the morning, which I do - because I am a morning person and have been so all my life - that automatically makes me someone who has a clear conscience? (which I do). Does that mean, then, that my friend - whom I know to walk in the greatest integrity and who cannot wake up until the second or third cup of strong coffee, does not have a clear conscience? I think not.

Obama was doomed before he even took office. From my vantage point as next-door neighbour, Americans have been living in fear since 9/11. One cannot move forward living in fear. They became ever more insular, instituting severe security restrictions at airports, hospitals, at shopping malls forgodssake. (which did spawn a whole new job-force, to many of whom it gave their first taste of a little power). Bush fed on these fears and the result was the burgeoning recession that lead to the collapse of the economy and its domino collapse of financial institutions, real estate and employment just before the elections. Americans (as most would) wanted a quick fix to the chaos. Obama and his freshness offered hope where before there was none.
But no one, not you Andre with your intelligence, nor liberal old me, or any politition could fix that mess. It takes years, determination and hard work.
I love America, its bones, its people and its enthusiasm. It will come out of this a different people, as does everyone who goes through severe crisis. I have no doubt it will be a better place, perhaps even the 'kinder, gentler nation' Bush senior encouraged.
And then we will write books about the era that will define it...

With Bill as her husband, she was more saavy than poor Bambi.

With Bill as her husband, she was more saavy than poor Bambi."
It's too bad Bill thought with a nether part of his body, those two could have been a good team. Maybe still will be...


I've been listening to Bill's comments about his vegan diet and wondering if I could adapt to it. Not caring for beans is my undoing, protein-wise.

What a ghastly bunch of fools we have to contend with.
Kat wrote: "What a ghastly bunch of fools we have to contend with."
I once read up the comments of the doom and gloom brigade during the Coolidge and Eisenhower administrations, two riotously successful periods for America, two superb chief executives, and they sounded just as gloomy as during the Depression.
I once read up the comments of the doom and gloom brigade during the Coolidge and Eisenhower administrations, two riotously successful periods for America, two superb chief executives, and they sounded just as gloomy as during the Depression.

I've been listening to Bill's comments about his vegan diet and wondering if I could adapt to it. No..."
Vegan's a hard road to deal with, and if you're looking to lose weight instead of animal discomfort/cruelty/death, paleo is probably the way to go.
I know vegans who have done well with it, and felt good, but never for more than six months at a time. Basically it's hard to get enough protein and fat on an all veg diet. Most of the people I knew who did it felt bad for the first three weeks (detoxing supposedly) pretty good months 1-4, and then started to have memory and energy issues after that.
On a related but snarky note:
http://www.guardian.co.uk/lifeandstyl...
And while that bit of fun is rather mean, it is also quite funny.
I like raw fillet drzzled with olive oil and balsamic vinegar too much to ever go vegan. Vegan food can be great tasting though.
Books mentioned in this topic
Modern Times: The World from the Twenties to the Nineties (other topics)The Curious Incident of the Dog in the Night-Time (other topics)
The Things They Carried (other topics)
A Country Such As This (other topics)
The Last Convertible (other topics)
More...
There are other books that similarly define ages. But some books that define ages have been overlooked, or in some cases not yet chosen or named because the age is historically within living memory. The other day I accidentally, in naming two books that I liked very much when they first appeared, named two such defining books that haven't yet had the recognition they deserve. I was amazed by the speed with which others agreed with my choices, so it isn't an idea I've had all by my lonesome.
Perhaps you have other candidates for books that define the ages I've selected, or books that define ages still in want of a definitive novel. I look forward to hearing your additions to the list. Here are my nominees, for adding to:
Anton Myrer, The Last Convertible -- Where did the golden generation of the 40s and the 50s go wrong to produce -- us! Okay, that's a joke, but this is a book you have to read to understand the days of infinite opportunity -- "sunlit uplands" in Winston Churchill's phrase -- from which your parents or grandparents arose.
James Webb, A Country Such as This -- the generation that came of age in the Vietnam War, which tore a great country from the consensus it could always find before.