Kids/Teens Book Club discussion
Archives (Deleted&moved topics)
>
Why Does It Seem That Girls Read More Than Guys?
message 201:
by
Spencer
(new)
Aug 15, 2011 10:47AM

reply
|
flag

That is a good thought. Maybe we need more people to write guys books. I would be horrible at that, but I do know some authors that I will suggest it to.
Whitney wrote: "i was wonderin tht 2 but, i tink i know. buys want 2 b tough, girls don't usually care. so there fore boys don't read cuz they think readin is nerdy"
I totally disagree. Boys trying to look tough & reading being nerdy is a stero-type. We went over this a few pages back. Its the same as saying: 'Girls wear short skirts because they want to look pretty". Very incorrect, totally not true, yes?
I totally disagree. Boys trying to look tough & reading being nerdy is a stero-type. We went over this a few pages back. Its the same as saying: 'Girls wear short skirts because they want to look pretty". Very incorrect, totally not true, yes?
But I wear short skirts to look pretty...LOL sorry jess had to...I don't think I even own a skirt...thats depressing well shopping it is tomorrow haha.
to be honest its probably because there are more women then men
to be honest its probably because there are more women then men

It's the stereotypes I think that give guys the impression that they shouldn't read.

And yeah, some guys are interested in looking tough, but I'm not really sure reading = 'not tough.' I found out that some of my guys from church - big ol' football players - started reading ARTEMIS FOWL over the summer. You couldn't tell these guys that reading isn't 'tough-looking,' bless their hearts.

(point is to try to get them to *want* to read)

I need to reread at least the last 4 Percy books. and the HP books.

Writing a book for males would be difficult. What would be put in? Tons of violence? It would make a book almost unreadable by anyone in my opinion. Most books I have written contain very little to no romance, a male main character, and some action/fighting scenes. That is the best I can get to trying to write something geared towards guys.
★ Jess wrote: "Whitney wrote: "i was wonderin tht 2 but, i tink i know. buys want 2 b tough, girls don't usually care. so there fore boys don't read cuz they think readin is nerdy"
I totally disagree. Boys tryin..."
I agree with you Jess. Sterotypes suck. :D

Aren't the Halo books geared towards guys or the Call Of Duty Books?

Frank B wrote: "Debra wrote: "Spencer wrote: "They publish tons more books for girls than they do guys. I am a guy and normally find myself in the adult section because their are more guy books there. I have grown..."
Hmmm, what classifies as a 'boy's book' is also a really good question, and could even have its own topic.
Ive been told Skulduggery Pleasant and its sequels are 'boys books' but I own them all, and have enjoyed them all, and am obviously not a boy. I dont think action and gore makes it a 'boys book'. The "Chaos Walking" trilogy has heaps of that, yet thats a book that can be enjoyed by anyone. So many of my girl friends have read and loved them. A male main character, again, doesn't mean its more of a boys book. Look at Harry Potter. Percy Jackson. Chaos Walking. Curious Incident of the Dog in the Nighttime. And The Hunger Games; it has a female protagonist, but guys love those books. What exactly makes a 'boys book'?
I think mainly, agree or disagree with me, its the marketing.
Boys and girls, having never seen either before; which cover would you rather pick up?
or
Something that the blurb promises has romance and mysterious cute boys, or something with fighting and blood and war. This is stereotyping extremely, and Im sorry, but Im just trying to show my point. If all book covers were white, with only the title on the cover, boys would be more likely to pick up a novel to read. Ugh, I mean, a boy might really love the story line in City of Bones, but would they want to be seen by their friends reading a book with a topless guy on the front?
Amelia, the pragmatic idealist wrote: "I need to re-read my Percy Jackson books. Re-reading is definitely cool :P"
Re-Reading is totally cool, I agree. I should probably read Percy Jackson for the first time...
Hmmm, what classifies as a 'boy's book' is also a really good question, and could even have its own topic.
Ive been told Skulduggery Pleasant and its sequels are 'boys books' but I own them all, and have enjoyed them all, and am obviously not a boy. I dont think action and gore makes it a 'boys book'. The "Chaos Walking" trilogy has heaps of that, yet thats a book that can be enjoyed by anyone. So many of my girl friends have read and loved them. A male main character, again, doesn't mean its more of a boys book. Look at Harry Potter. Percy Jackson. Chaos Walking. Curious Incident of the Dog in the Nighttime. And The Hunger Games; it has a female protagonist, but guys love those books. What exactly makes a 'boys book'?
I think mainly, agree or disagree with me, its the marketing.
Boys and girls, having never seen either before; which cover would you rather pick up?


Something that the blurb promises has romance and mysterious cute boys, or something with fighting and blood and war. This is stereotyping extremely, and Im sorry, but Im just trying to show my point. If all book covers were white, with only the title on the cover, boys would be more likely to pick up a novel to read. Ugh, I mean, a boy might really love the story line in City of Bones, but would they want to be seen by their friends reading a book with a topless guy on the front?
Amelia, the pragmatic idealist wrote: "I need to re-read my Percy Jackson books. Re-reading is definitely cool :P"
Re-Reading is totally cool, I agree. I should probably read Percy Jackson for the first time...

My brother in law reads, but only when a book is truly tempting. He's definitely not the type of guy you would think is a reader. lol
Otherwise, most of the guys I know who don't read... I don't think they ever gave it a chance outside of school. :( I think that might be their issue...

Gore and violence don't make a 'boy' book. I'm saying so many books are filled with Romance and guys normally don't go for that.

Okay, see i'm a girl and i would pick both books. I have lots of girlfriends who would pick both. You do have a point about guys picking up a book with a topless guy on the front.

She's just using the normal stereotype. That's typically what we see most guys grabbing on the shelves as opposed to a romance novel- although there are plenty of guys who read those too.

1.men are more into technology, this is a known fact, so their brains are more used to the speed of t.v., internet and computer/virtual games.
2. There are books "for" boys but they are limited. Once you have gone past Harry Potter and that genre what is left for guys to read? Its not like you'll find a guy reading a book about angels or fairies.
3. And lastly, I do think its a mental disorder that not only guys but girls too can get. Books are for nerdy people. Well they surely are not going to be the next multi-millionaire author, what a pity....

I agree with that when i look at alot of book that are 'for guys' there all war, action ect books, while other books for girls have romance and ect.
I think the stereotype of teenage girls read more. is something people seem to stick to.
I also think it would be better if books were widened for male and female.
Also if you ever find advice book or teenage probelms and changes, they all are for girls it is almost impossible to find one gor guys and when you do its adressed to parents. I think thats stupid...then again i guess many guys would not want to be seen with that type of a book
Also another reason could be that alot of males have more trouble reading than females that isn't a fact or anything but what i have notices, and i find males (especially at older ages) who can't read well don't try too but give up because its embarassing i guess....sorry if that sounded bad.



Shopping is constructive? And girls are more educated?
That, my friends, is a myth that too many people believe. Boys can think. Boys can even be constructive.
In fact, out of the people I know, the boys are almost more constructive and busy and the girls are doing random useless stuff.

Shopping is constructive? And girls are more educated?
That, my friends, is a myth that too many people believe. Boys can think. Boys can even be constructive.
In fact, out of t..."
I totally agree!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Amelia, the pragmatic idealist wrote: "Yeah, that's one of the most generalizing, stereotypical posts I've ever seen."
Agreed. Im not taking that post seriously anyway.
Agreed. Im not taking that post seriously anyway.



I think you have a point, I have very few freinds who read that weren't encouraged alot by thier parents.







Girls are just way more intelligent and feel like they can comment and discuss books, while boys are playing x box or something and losing brain cells...well at least my brothers are
I don't think any guys at my school read...every time our teacher gives us time 2 read I'm like "Heck ya bring it!" they all grumble and pass notes. I think guys see reading as making them nerds, and they don't want that to happen.
Books mentioned in this topic
Halo: Evolutions Volume II (other topics)City of Bones (other topics)
Skulduggery Pleasant (other topics)
The Replacement (other topics)
The Replacement (other topics)
More...