THE Group for Authors! discussion
The Craft
>
Why do we write?
message 1:
by
Charles
(new)
Jun 24, 2011 06:35PM

reply
|
flag
As per the Samuel Johnson quote? For money?
Good for you, but to be quite honest I would never have become a writer until my back was against the wall. I had no other means of making money, but being broke overrode my lack of confidence. No matter how many people had told me I could write and write well, I didn't take them seriously and up until then making a living by other means was more immediately available. Once I had no choice, I went for it. That was back in 1993. The other precious commodity that came my way back then was time. Suddenly I had lots of it - and no more excuses.

I once attended a lecture given by P D James. She said she was immediately published once she had taken on board that a work of fiction must entertain. I've told stories verbally since I was a child. It comes naturally and I enjoy doing it. It may be very simple compared to high ideas about bridging cultural differences, though the books I wrote as Jeannie Johnson are woven around the social anomalies of the time. i.e. WW2. White GIs allowed to marry the white English mothers of their illegitimate children, black GIs not, and early 19th century, the end of slavery in the British colonies, though not the end of bigotry. So you do have a point, Murray.

Jim
And you have the time. You also have the experience of living. Beats golf doesn't it?

Jim


Jim

My personal view is that John Locke doesn't worry about women reading his books with the leggy girls on the cover. He's more interested in them reading his $5 book that advocates churning out quickie Ebooks that generate a fast revenue stream rather than giving readers value for their money. As an author, I find the money-at-all-costs mentality offensive. If enough people, I won't dignify them with the term "writer" churn out trash for cash, then Indie EBook publishing will fail and traditional publishers will grin and use a holier than-thou-approach as they say: We told you so!


Good for you Jim, as I noted elsewhere in this group: I write because I am, and because I can.
BUT: Just don't ask me to reverse rolls with you and practice medicine. :-)

Sorry Charles, but I couldn't disagree more. There's a difference between churning out trash and writing. Any who thinks writing is easier than working a 9 to 5 job obviously has no clue. Let me have your telephone number via a private message and I'll call you next time I'm sitting at the keyboard at 1:30 a.m, where' I've been since morning.
Writers do books because we're all a little insane. I'd make more money at McDonald's than writing then having to worry whether a book priced at 99 cents will sell.



Dan, I must commend you for a desire to write to entertain people rather than just being after a quick buck.
I'm pretty good at marketing having grown Harlequin Books to huge popularity and also wrote the first PR program for the Cabbage Patch Kids. BUT, product promotion is the highly important evil twin of writing for authors these days. Decades ago publishers used to promote a wide variety of their book lists, now they just focus on the top few bestsellers and and tell everyone else to do their own, without providing any guidance. That's why I wrote Self-Promotion for Authors as it distilled my thoughts and the successes of a dozen other writers into a marketing guide that allows authors to tailor an plan to fit their needs and capabilities.
There is no shortcut to marketing success. But without doing the marketing, you may as well have not written the book. It will simply get buried among all the others competing for attention. But just remember one thing. You are not there to promote your book, but yourself. You are the brand. The goal is to have people looking for the latest book by Dan ____. Then you'll be successful. Hope that helps.
Best,
There is no quick buck in writing. Fame and fortune are all part of the fiction. I did it because I had nothing else to do and absolutely no income whatsoever. I guess it took my mind off things. I've had 28 books published so far in three languages. I know what the draughty garret is all about - it gives you wings!



The things that motivate me to write are as follows:
It is cheaper than fuelling my huge appetite for reading; at one stage I had a book-a-day habit.
It is more absorbing and entertaining (for me) than watching TV.
Now that I have got to the stage of having published a novel I love getting feedback from people and knowing that I have entertained someone and made them laugh.
It puts my daydreaming to good use.
I really never concerned myself with making money. There are so many books on this planet that I really don't expect my work to makes its way to the top of the surface and get huge attention/make a profit. But I do enjoy the thrill of seeing how many have sold on Amazon, even if it only brings in enough to buy a new handbag. I won't be giving up my day job any time soon, and in any case I enjoy being out in the world. Being a full time writer is a little claustrophobic.







A published book is a published book. It is printed books from traditional publishers that are rapidly disappearing, followed by brick-and-mortar stores. Borders is being sold in pieces. Part of the stores will remain. Others are being taken over by auction companies and will vanish. B&N is in bankruptcy. If Google succeeds in the huge copyright lawsuit brought by the American Association of Publishers and the Author's Guild, then even POD and EBooks could be in danger. But for the foreseeable future, printed books will remain. Even bestselling writers such as Stephen King and Warren Adler are exploring EBooks.

Ahh, a modest man. :-)
I've been a writer for too many decades to even consider my scribbling a work of art.

So, writing is no longer an art form. I guess Mark Twain traveled the west just to write about jumping frogs and the end of the true American, the indian.

Writing is a craft that occasionally is elevated to an art form by some of the masters. Rarely does someone without years of developing their craft become an "artist."
As a writer for more than 45 years, I find a writer with almost no credentials except for one book that received three stars from an anonymous reader to be presumptuous. Indeed, the reviewer has only reviewed three books and both of the others were rated higher.
While I admire anyone having the fortitude to take on a new career, calling your uncompleted second manuscript a work of art, then becoming defensing when challenged is incredible. Then implying your "work of art" rises to the level of Samuel Clemens, one of America's finest writers, is hubris.
Then there's the matter of your first publishing house, Eloquent Books, an obvious vanity printing house rather than a traditional and/or independent publishing house.
Hopefully, I've misinterpreted all of the information I've been able to locate about you. Please, fill me and other members in on the depth of your writing experience. A Google search failed to turn up anything other than your Kindle profile saying you are writing your second book. Please, tell me where I'm in error.

Larry wrote: "Charles wrote: "I am writing a new novel that is in my opinion a work of art. It is about the end of the world. Every author that I have ever talked to has an opinion about the end of the world. Ma..."
Thanks for the tip, Aabra; I will definitely look into the Kindle thing. My book is one of daily meditations based on scripture so it is not a book one reads all at once but day by day. To me, this works best with an actual rather than a digital book, but half the battle is getting people to check it out so offering it in a place where I can control price makes good sense.

I actually am writing a third book. My second is in editing and I have a book of short stories that I am updating that I wrote in the sixties. I will agree that I am no Stephen King or a Mark Twain but I am writing. And will finish what I am working on. I think you took me too seriously.

No, I took you at your word. Thus illustrating the power of the word. :-) There's a saying to the effect: Say what you mean and mean what you say.
Moving on, congrats on the third book in progress. I'm trying to get two manuscripts rolling and revise a third.
When it comes to the end of the world, there were a couple of great books out in the early 1980s. But perhaps the greatest was about the end of civilization. That's Pat Frank's Alas, Babylon. Super fiction with heavy doses of truth and is even now used by teachers.


The end of the world! Please! Can we try to write about something that hasn't been done to death in hundreds of books and movies. Try writing about vampires instead. Now there's a genre that no one has tried lately. (And I won't even comment on what "a work of art" could possibly mean in this context!)

Really, Peter? What hasn't been done to death in any genre you pick? In my opinion it's not the basic plot, which is hardly ever new, but the way the plot evolves and is dealt with by the interaction of the characters. If you can think of a plot not already overdone (not vampires), please let me know so I can use it in my next novel.




Wise words.
