In the Woods
discussion
Did I miss something?
message 51:
by
Katherine
(new)
-
rated it 4 stars
Sep 17, 2014 03:41PM

reply
|
flag

I see the comment above about The Secret Place. Having been so hugely disappointed by In The Woods I didn't plan on ever reading the author again. Is it really worth trying The Secret Place? Just curiuos because I will if others highly recommend it.
Can I get responds of whick book is the authors best so maybe I can try another one?

it was like a real life unsolved mystery to me...you hope to get resolution, but that does not always happen

Every book in the series is the best according to somebody, because they're all so different. If you care about the solve more than character development, skip them all, but it's worth mentioning that she doesn't leave any big mysteries wide open after the first novel.


..."
I did!

But what on earth was the supernatural element all about? The thing in the tree and the thing that appears in front of the car. Never explained or tied in with anything else.
To me supernatural type stuff has to be really well done to be good. This wasn't, it came they kinda saw and it went never to reappear... Eh?
Still a really good book though.
Read the likeness but never believed in the whole "they looked exactly the same" bit. It's never going to happen that two people look so alike. The psychological stuff's really good though.

For those who question the likelihood of the plot and think they don't have a doppelganger living an hour away from you:
* Exhibit A
* Exhibit B
Also...
#BringBackRobRyan



"I was aching to go over to her, put my arms around her, hold her close until that terrible rigidity melted out of her body and she came back from whatever remote place she had gone to."
Rob is not a sociopath without sympathy. He's just a huge jerk when he's not in his right mind. Yes, he's a liar, but what is meant by that disclaimer comes up again explicitly and it's not that; unreliable narratives have to have actual meaning contained in the contradictions and this book has a lot more meaning without such a cheap twist and with its ambiguity intact.

What I got, instead of a payoff on that fascinating premise, was a character study of Adam/Rob, their remaining friend, who is FUBAR because of the trauma he suffered with them, that he doesn't remember, and that we never find out about. He's a misogynistic jerk, and I ended up not liking him much at all. Cassie I liked, and I'll read The Likeness just because it's her story, but I swear to God if it's another ambiguous, pointless ending with no closure to the main story involved, I'll never touch another Tana French novel, regardless of how deft her prose may be.

I just don't get it.



What I got, instead of ..."
I don't think the author is responsible for the blurbs printed on the back of the book-I think it is the publisher. I often find these give too much or the wrong information and the book would have been more interesting or satisfying without knowing as much.
If you hadn't been misled by the blurb do you think you would still have been so dissatisfied? For all I know, Tana French may have fully endorsed the expectation and that part of her intent was to leave the reader hanging. An artist often wants to make us feel things, to make us think. As the partaker, we might have the expectation that the experience should make us feel satisfied when the artist intends something quite different...

While it is absolutely the author's right to end her work however she pleases, it is the reader's right to be less than thrilled with it. Which is not to say I hated it. I didn't. I don't finish books I hate. But I think her ending was more than acceptably ambiguous. She didn't even present the options of what could have happened. Her character just doesn't remember anything and there's nothing to speculate about. I doubt think I'm alone in my complaints, either.

I've found over the past few years that I like the suspended or withheld ending, if done well.
I didn't care for Broken Harbor. I love French's writing, but that one did nothing for me. I hated the resolution of one of the main plots and it ruined the whole thing for me. Even her style of writing seemed mundane compared to "In The Woods" and "The Likeness".




Katherine wrote: "Just wait until you start The Secret Place. Best. one. Yet."
I wouldn't bother reading the secret place I hated it just as much, unanswered questions sgain




I was beside myself upon the end of In the Woods with no resolution, every nerve was jangling for the fix of a conclusion. I loved the book,, loved her writing style but oh, the pain!
Did I pick up The Likeness with the fervent hope that Rob would reappear in Cassie's story, that at the very least we'd find out more about what was happening in his life even if the mystery wasn't resolved? Absolutely. French's writing was even more lush and evocative even while I was despising Cassie I felt sucked into another world (not necessarily a supernatural world although tinging on it).
I can only be glad that French doesn't do the full-blown supernatural as that is not my thing and I like that every book I read doesn't have to follow the same formula. Except for Broken Harbor (which I just didn't like and only connected with any characters in the most fractional way) I think she pulls it off very well. She is one of those authors that leave me somewhat up in the air at the end of the book but the books and characters stay with me.
If any of you have read Liane Moriarty's The Husband's Secret, there were a few threads that were left unwoven and characters we wanted to know more about. Upon finishing, I thought it was one of her less fulfilling reads but as time has passed, I think that was more my emotional reaction one character was dealt with. It has moved up to third place in her books for me.
Vive la difference!
And this being Thanksgiving in the USA, I'm thankful for people with shared and differing views to discuss with and let me not end the sentence with a preposition!

<~spoiler~> spoiler content here <~/spoiler~> you should be able to do a spoiler on a tablet, maybe?

I did the same reread the last pages.. because i thought i might had missed something


So, should I read any more of this series? Will i be able to enjoy the superb writing without wanting to throw the book in frustration at the end? Can anyone else who has read more Tana French advise?


Ah, thank you, I may have to steer clear too :)



all discussions on this book
|
post a new topic
Faithful Place (other topics)
In the Woods (other topics)
Books mentioned in this topic
Broken Harbour (other topics)Faithful Place (other topics)
In the Woods (other topics)