Love With The Lights Off discussion
Book/Author Chats
>
How far is too far?
date
newest »

message 1:
by
Jaimey, The Other Queen
(last edited May 23, 2011 06:14AM)
(new)
May 23, 2011 06:09AM

reply
|
flag
Linda and I started this group after several weeks of discussion. My newest release, Honor, contains a little more detail than usual. Linda revealed that at least one of her WIPs contains a scene that would remove it from the "clean" or "sweet" category. That got us thinking.
While none of our books are by any means graphic (in our opinions, of course), some of them do contain certain words, actions, or behaviors that make them fall into a sort of limbo. In fact, we don't even have a word to describe this limbo except to say it falls somewhere between clean and graphic.
Then Linda suggested it was like writing a love scene where the door is open but the lights are off. You know what's happening but most of it is still left to the imagination.
So tell me, where do you draw the line?
While none of our books are by any means graphic (in our opinions, of course), some of them do contain certain words, actions, or behaviors that make them fall into a sort of limbo. In fact, we don't even have a word to describe this limbo except to say it falls somewhere between clean and graphic.
Then Linda suggested it was like writing a love scene where the door is open but the lights are off. You know what's happening but most of it is still left to the imagination.
So tell me, where do you draw the line?


Where do I draw the line? When the love scenes get OVERLY desciptive or *ahem* "kinky" Im out of my comfort zone!

I like Jaimey's description of a love scene with the door open. Sexy, romantic, intimate, well, I will just leave the rest to your imagination :)

A little ol'fashion "hard to get" & "courtship" THEN
some "spice"( with the door open)keeps me into a book alot longer.



Shelley wrote: "Fluids! Seriously! That grosses me out and will turn me off. Sounds strange, but it does. I don't think it's necessary."
That doesn't sound strange at all (at least to me) and I TOTALLY agree!
That doesn't sound strange at all (at least to me) and I TOTALLY agree!


Totally agree with you Lady Danielle on all points!


I am in a similar situation, in that the word "Graphic" for me always meant extremely violent, a lot of sex, gore, etc. I had no idea that Graphic to some meant a comic book.
Of course the writer you referred to may have been trying to emphasize a point. don't forget, writers have freedom to write what they want unless they are writing a bio.

I prefer them to be married also Anne, though I've ended up accepting that they are generally unmarried and just knowing that I would never personally do that.
Jasja wrote: if the main character would be a minister or so (in this case more graphic scenes would feel a lot more weird and unconfortable for some reason)...
Lol, infinitely more so.


Jaimey wrote: "Everyone has a different opinion when it comes to the meaning of clean vs. graphic in a romance. What do you think? How far is too far in a love scene? Where do you draw the line? "
For me, teenagers under 18/ teacher romance novels. I'd say whatever your comfortable with! Be yourself, that's what romance is all about. GLBT, erotica, contemporary, it's all about what you want in a novel. Personally I love all romance except minors/ adults going at it. That's all I gotta say :)
For me, teenagers under 18/ teacher romance novels. I'd say whatever your comfortable with! Be yourself, that's what romance is all about. GLBT, erotica, contemporary, it's all about what you want in a novel. Personally I love all romance except minors/ adults going at it. That's all I gotta say :)



I do not read erotica.

