Terminalcoffee discussion

note: This topic has been closed to new comments.
92 views
Feeling Nostalgic? The archives > Language/ Grammar Help

Comments Showing 51-100 of 147 (147 new)    post a comment »

message 51: by Lobstergirl, el principe (new)

Lobstergirl | 24778 comments Mod
Both are correct.


message 52: by Lobstergirl, el principe (new)

Lobstergirl | 24778 comments Mod
"I am older than he" is correct because you're dropping the is. I am older than he is.

The verb "to be" is one of the few (only?) verbs where subject and object are both permitted to be in the nominative. "I" and "he" are in the nominative case. "Him" is the accusative case.


message 53: by Kenneth P. (new)

Kenneth P. (kennethp) Thank you LG. But your nominative and accusative cases have sent me scurrying, crablike, for my bottle of Excedrin (only because I'm out of heroin).


message 54: by Lobstergirl, el principe (new)

Lobstergirl | 24778 comments Mod
I understand. The only reason I know those words is from taking German. German grammar is a little crazy, but it helps teach you English grammar.


message 55: by Lobstergirl, el principe (new)

Lobstergirl | 24778 comments Mod
Sorry?


message 56: by Kenneth P. (new)

Kenneth P. (kennethp) Never mind LG. I misread your post. Good Night


message 57: by Scout (new)

Scout (goodreadscomscout) | 3594 comments Kenneth P. wrote: "He and she went to dinner.
I went to dinner with him and her.

Yay or nay?"


The easy way to determine whether you're using the correct pronouns is to try each separately:

He went to dinner. She went to dinner. Both are correct, so you're fine.

I went to dinner with him. I went to dinner with her. Both are correct, so you're fine again.

Easy peasy.


message 58: by Lobstergirl, el principe (new)

Lobstergirl | 24778 comments Mod
YES.


message 59: by Kenneth P. (new)

Kenneth P. (kennethp) I like you guys


message 60: by Félix (new)

Félix (habitseven) Well done, Scout.


message 61: by Scout (new)

Scout (goodreadscomscout) | 3594 comments Thanks.


message 62: by Scout (new)

Scout (goodreadscomscout) | 3594 comments This isn't a language/grammar question, but I didn't know where else to ask it. When I learned to type, two spaces were required after a period. Has this changed to only one space?


message 63: by Phil (new)

Phil | 11837 comments Yes.

I learned the same way you did, but that was on those antiques we called "typewriters." WIth the advent of computers, the single space became the norm.


message 64: by Félix (new)

Félix (habitseven) Who's the Norm?


message 65: by Phil (new)

Phil | 11837 comments He's the one sitting near the Cliff.


message 66: by Scout (new)

Scout (goodreadscomscout) | 3594 comments NORM!!!

Thanks, Phil, for the info. Who knows what else has slipped by me. What a world!


message 67: by Lobstergirl, el principe (new)

Lobstergirl | 24778 comments Mod
I still do two spaces. It just feels righter to my fingers. Of course on GR this autocorrects to one space.


message 68: by Lobstergirl, el principe (new)

Lobstergirl | 24778 comments Mod
Space Invaders

Why you should never, ever use two spaces after a period.


http://www.slate.com/articles/technol...

(author's opinion, not mine)


message 69: by Jonathan (new)

Jonathan Lopez | 4726 comments If you're writing for publication, it's generally advisable to use only one space after periods and colons instead of two because otherwise you're creating extra work for the copy editor, who will have to go into the document and eliminate the double spaces. No reason to make people's lives more difficult than they need to be. For other applications--personal letters, email, even some types of corporate documents--it's probably okay to use the older typewriting convention of double spacing after a period, although this will probably look more and more dated as time goes by.

The current edition (16th) of the Chicago Manual of Style, section 2.9, advises "leaving a single character space, not two spaces, between sentences and after colons used within a sentence." Chicago specifies only one exception, section 14.121, for certain types of technical notation in which no space at all should be used after a colon--for instance, in footnotes for multivolume works, where "volume six, page 194" would be rendered as VI:194.


message 70: by Félix (new)

Félix (habitseven) I learned here. Thanks, folks.


message 71: by janine (new)

janine | 7709 comments When I'm proofreading in Word the first thing I do is remove all double spaces.


message 72: by Scout (new)

Scout (goodreadscomscout) | 3594 comments I'm convinced. Now I have to convince my old dog thumb to do a new trick.


message 73: by Alias Reader (new)

Alias Reader (aliasreader) Jonathan wrote: "If you're writing for publication, it's generally advisable to use only one space after periods and colons instead of two because otherwise you're creating extra work for the copy editor, who will ..."

-----------

I've read the the keyboard was setup the way it is to slow down the typist on the old manual typewriters. If they were to type faster the keys would jam. My guess is the two space rule also was used to slow the typist down and prevent the keys from jamming.

Personally, I like the look of the two space. Maybe it's because I abhor change. :)


message 74: by Emily (new)

Emily E (emily_e1) | 1032 comments I like double spacing after a full stop.. that will be a hard habit to break.


message 75: by Don (new)

Don Josefez | 2 comments does almost doesn't count?


message 76: by Jammies (new)

Jammies Jonathan wrote: "If you're writing for publication, it's generally advisable to use only one space after periods and colons instead of two because otherwise you're creating extra work for the copy editor, who will ..."

Jonathan, what is this mythical creature, "copy editor"? Few if any publications which I have read in the last two years show any evidence of such aminals.


message 77: by Jonathan (new)

Jonathan Lopez | 4726 comments They exist. I shudder to think how incompreceivable bad my stuff would look without their frequent and helpful intervention.


message 78: by Lobstergirl, el principe (new)

Lobstergirl | 24778 comments Mod
I was reading something yesterday about Greg Mortenson and the Three Cups of Tea debacle. He and his organization CAI and Penguin are being sued. I think there is talk that the lawsuit might go class action. But Penguin is seeking to be removed from the lawsuit because their position is that nonfiction books are not fact checked; it would be prohibitively expensive to fact check them. I thought that was quite interesting. How does the New Yorker afford it, then?


message 79: by Jonathan (new)

Jonathan Lopez | 4726 comments By selling ads at a very high rate--although even they are probably hurting a little in the current advertising environment.

With regard to non-fiction trade books, it's true that there isn't a specific fact-checking department at most publishers, but there's a certain amount of fact-checking in that a good editor will query an author to back up assertions made in the text. Likewise there is an obligation to perform a measure of due diligence. The situation with James Frey was particularly egregious in that regard, since Frey had originally shopped that project around (according to news reports) as a work of fiction.


message 80: by Courtney (new)

Courtney | 241 comments

My mom sent this to me. I laughed out loud


message 81: by Scout (new)

Scout (goodreadscomscout) | 3594 comments I'm smiling.


message 82: by Kevin (new)

Kevin  (ksprink) | 11469 comments "Capitalization is the difference between helping your Uncle Jack off a horse and helping your uncle jack off a horse."


message 83: by ~Geektastic~ (new)

 ~Geektastic~ (atroskity) | 3205 comments Lol.

"Let's eat, Grandma!"

"Let's eat Grandma!"

Save a Grandma: use punctuation!


message 84: by Lobstergirl, el principe (new)

Lobstergirl | 24778 comments Mod
Kevin "El Liso Grande" wrote: ""Capitalization is the difference between helping your Uncle Jack off a horse and helping your uncle jack off a horse.""

Is this the answer to the mystery of why Kevin doesn't capitalize?...


message 85: by Hazel (new)

Hazel | 37 comments there, their, they're everyone, the language will survive...


message 86: by Lobstergirl, el principe (new)

Lobstergirl | 24778 comments Mod
Uh!


message 87: by Lobstergirl, el principe (new)

Lobstergirl | 24778 comments Mod
People can survive as quadruple amputees, but they're quadruple amputees. Just because we can butcher the language doesn't mean we ought.


message 88: by Hazel (new)

Hazel | 37 comments I know that, it was a joke... here have a laugh:

http://www.buzzfeed.com/mjs538/twitte...


message 89: by Scout (new)

Scout (goodreadscomscout) | 3594 comments Someone please explain the difference between its and it's.


message 90: by Félix (new)

Félix (habitseven) It's is a contraction of "it is". Its is the possessive of "it" or more than one "it".


message 91: by Scout (new)

Scout (goodreadscomscout) | 3594 comments Thanks.


message 92: by Cheri (last edited May 25, 2012 11:15PM) (new)

Cheri | 795 comments Kevin "El Liso Grande" wrote: ""Capitalization is the difference between helping your Uncle Jack off a horse and helping your uncle jack off a horse.""

I used to work at an Arabian horse farm and they did jack off the horses for artificial insemination. I have pictures. I don't think Uncle Jack did it.


message 93: by Cheri (last edited May 25, 2012 11:14PM) (new)

Cheri | 795 comments Scout wrote: "Someone please explain the difference between its and it's."

'It's' is a contraction for 'it is.' Example: 'It's wonderful' can also be 'It is wonderful.' (The apostrophe is a substitute for the missing 'I' in 'is'; like the missing 'n & o' in 'can't' for 'cannot').

'Its' is a possessive pronoun. Example: 'A leopard can't change its spots'; The spots belong to the leopard.

If you get confused, substitute 'it is' instead and see how it sounds: 'A leopard can't change it is spots'. Nope. Must be 'its spots'. Do leopards have spots?

Do you know why you should never play poker in the jungle? Too many cheetahs out there.

Forgive me for my punctuation and infantile humor.


message 94: by Hazel (new)

Hazel | 37 comments leopards have spots, jaguars have rosettes, cheetahs have more spotlike spots than either. No help with understanding grammar at all, but meh.

Why don't you find any aspirin in the jungle? Because the parrots et em all.


message 95: by evie (new)

evie (ecie) | 4437 comments Cheri wrote: "Kevin "El Liso Grande" wrote: ""Capitalization is the difference between helping your Uncle Jack off a horse and helping your uncle jack off a horse.""

I used to work at an Arabian horse farm and ..."


Did they have a jack off machine for that task?


message 96: by Cheri (new)

Cheri | 795 comments They did it by hand. No machinery used.


message 97: by Félix (new)

Félix (habitseven) It's a job. Manual labor.


message 98: by Cheri (new)

Cheri | 795 comments How do you think that could be listed as job experience on a resume (CV)? You started this with your Uncle Jack and his horse.


message 99: by Lobstergirl, el principe (new)

Lobstergirl | 24778 comments Mod
Animal husband.


message 100: by evie (new)

evie (ecie) | 4437 comments Jack of all trades.


back to top
This topic has been frozen by the moderator. No new comments can be posted.