We LoveFilm discussion
Everything Books
>
water for elephants
date
newest »
newest »
Mod
See that is what stopped me from reading this a while ago. But people say its really good. I have no clue what it is really about. I'll try the audio this week and post updates. If it isn't good then I'm not even bothering with the movie. I'm not that keen on the lead guy anyway.
Mod
LOL, I haven't seen any of those movies. Young girls think he is so gorgeous. Yikes!
I had to stop the audio book the other day. I'm wrapping this up. I think the book is good in some parts but it drags. I think I need to read it instead of listen to it. I don't know if that makes sense. But I'm not interested right now.
Mod
Anyway, makes perfect sense what you said about reading it yourself instead of listening. I've felt the same way about some books I've listened to on audio -- eg Outlander which I dnf'ed because the narrator just wasn't pulling me into the story. I plan to give it another go since it's such a popular and beloved book for many, but boy those ... what is it ... 800+ pages are daunting. I just don't have the time to dedicate to super long books. Maybe when I retire! lol
Had the same reaction with Time Traveler's Wife too although I persevered and listened to the end.
One of the best books I listened to on audio last year was The Help. The narrators were awesome! Every last one of them. They managed to take me away with the story rather than having me focused on their voices. It was like listening to a radio play -- I could picture the scenes very carefully in my head. I think that's a perfect example of how an audio book should be experienced.
My next books on audio will be A Song of Fire & Ice: A Game of Thrones by George RR Martin and The Bronze Horseman. Hopefully they will be good!
I hate Outlander with a passion. I ripped that book apart. NEVER will I read another book by that author.
Mod
Not that you're alone in your powerful dislike. It seems to be one of this books where people either loved it or hated it.
I've copied my review below.I really wanted to like this book but I couldn't. This book is now in the garbage after reading the most horrific ending ever. I know that most are in favor of this book or against it. I stand proudly with my fellow haters because this book was straight up trash. Oh how I hate thee, let me count the ways!
1. The book was too boring. Goodness! I struggle to get to page 200. It was only then that I finally got into the story.
2. Too many details that I felt did not contribute to the story was included in this book. She could have cut this book in half and I would have gotten the point.
3. Claire makes me sick! I hate stupid women. I could not for the life of me understand her actions. Now, you are on your second honeymoon, and somehow you end up time traveling in the past. You all of a sudden forget that you're married? You carry on with another man? I don't get it. True enough, she behaved okay in the beginning but then she went downhill. I never really understood why she wasn't really concern with getting back home. I don't know about anyone else but I would miss today's modern conviences. She was just going along with the flow and it didn't fit in my mind.
Once Claire and Jamie was married, I was slightly disturbed. Of course in my head, I couldn't honor the marriage. But okay, Claire obviously did and consummated it. From there on out it was nothing but sex. How many times did they need to have sex? They even had sex after she was nearly raped. Like savages, they are humping in the woods or wherever because they are horny. I wanted a real connection between these two and all I felt was lust!
Then Claire gets even more disgusting IMO. Jamie felt the need to punish her by beating her. He beat her "within an inch of her life" and this was acceptable. I know that we are talking about a particular time frame but it still doesn't make it right. My problem wasn't with Jamie. In fact, I actually liked him. He was very sweet (minus the beating). My problem rested with Claire because she easily accepted the beating because he started telling about the many times he had gotten a beating. I really wanted her to look at him and say, "Shut your a** up!" but no instead after numerous accounts of when he was on the receiving end of the beatings, she says "I love you!"
From that moment the book went even more downhill because I hated her!
4. What happened to Frank? Just like that, he was gone. Every time he was mentioned throughout the book, she quickly pushed back any thoughts of him. She even had a chance to go back, but instead she chose to stay with this dude. Never once thinking, "What happened to Frank? Is he worried? I miss him!"
5. The grotesque details of the rape. I thought it was going to be a minor scene but instead it went on and on. I couldn't take it. I felt so bad for Jamie. My heart was so heavy when he went into the details. Then what do idiot Claire do, she re-enacts the scene in a sense to get him to respond.
I can't go no further because I'm sick!
Mod
Yes it did. I think mainly for me it wasn't the beating but her immediate acceptance of it. His explanation was that he was a victim of beatings so it should be acceptable. I don't like that!
Mod
I thought it was a good adaptation of the book. I heard about the casting while I was reading it, and could totally picture Christoph Waltz as August, perfectly combining menace and charm. Reese Witherspoon was just okay, but I was pleasantly surprised at Robert Pattinson who had a bit more range to play than in the Twilight films.
Moviemavengal, I marked this book as DNF. It was a hard audio for me to get into. I still would like to see the movie.
Samantha wrote: "Moviemavengal, I marked this book as DNF. It was a hard audio for me to get into. I still would like to see the movie."I went with a girlfriend to the movie who had never read the book, and she really enjoyed it. Definitely worth a rental at least when it comes out on DVD.
Well thanks for the tip. I will do so.
I haven't read this book yet, but I have a copy of sitting on my shelf. I hope to get to it soon.
Samantha wrote: "I've copied my review below.I really wanted to like this book but I couldn't. This book is now in the garbage after reading the most horrific ending ever. I know that most are in favor of this bo..."
I read Outlander a few years ago. It was definitely longer than it had to be in my opinion. In the end, I think I had mixed feelings about it. Some of the ladies at my job read this one together, and they just went on and on about how much they loved it. At first I was wondering if I read the same book as them. I rarely re-read a book, but I'm wondering if I read it again, would I get more out of the story? I'm planning on re-reading it with a group of people,so that I can discuss things while we go along. I will say that I read the next one or two books in the series, and I can't remember what happened. I did so much skimming that I think I may have missed some important details.
Michelle, I don't know if I could even stomach trying the other books after reading Outlander.
I'm placing the audio book on my ipod now to listen to it do when I finally see it, I can finally listen to it over the next few weeks.