Twilight
discussion
Vampires don't sparkle.

I think you're one of the few people who mention Jasper as someone of interest - and I totally agree. Poor Jasper gets left out way too often. He's such a tortured soul, but super hot in his own way.

What grammar errors are people so bothered by? The story was written in the first person point of view of a teenage girl. Are we really expecting perfect grammar from a teenage girl?

I like Twilight, but SPARKLING vampires? Seriously? Like are they jewels or something? They weren't meant to sparkle in the sun, they're dead!

DAMMMMOONNNN ALLLL THEEE WAYYYYY!!!!! hes hot, clever, smart, completly bad-ass and I ....LOOOOOVVVEEEE.... HIM!!!!!!!!!! <3 <3 <3 <3 no joke xD

and always had those big plastic fangs.
I loved the movie The Little Vampire! It wa..."
Same here...

Heehee. That's true though...

Yeah, cruel, bloodsucking, evil vampires are just waaaaaay cooler in every way!

But do you guys get why they sparkle? There is a reason, not "just because".
It's a way to attract prey to the preditor. Just like how some animials in nature mimmic other things, to lure their prey in. The sparkling is just a way to mesmerize a victim, to get closer. And yes, I know that vampires really don't need it. They're strong and fast. But that's just the way it is.
I've said it before. If I saw a hot guy staring at me, sparkling in the sun. I'd do a double take, and maybe even want to get closer! : )
Happy Reading!

But do you guys get why they sparkle? There is a reason, not "just because".
It's a way to attract prey to the ..."
I don't have anything against sparkling vampires per say, but it just seems a bit cheesy. Don't get me wrong, I enjoyed the books for what they were, enjoyment reading - which often includes the ridiculous. I just don't understand why some people take it so seriously (personally) when others think some aspect of a book is a little bit stupid to them. It's all one opinion over another. That's why I enjoy goodreads, to get each person's different take on something that I've read or plan to read. Sometimes I discover a different aspect to a book or think again about something I've read based upon these comments. I don't take them personally though.
And I will agree with you on that final point - If I did meet some hot guy who was sparkling, I would certainly do a double take:)



But do you guys get why they sparkle? There is a reason, not "just because".
It's a way to attract prey to the ..."
I'm just curious but does anyone know of any natural predator that sparkles to attract its prey? Just wondering if there is an example that might address whether or not the idea that vampires sparkle is ridiculous. I'm not particularly fond of the whole sparkly vampire thing but I'd find it easier to accept if there was an example of something similar.
I'm not overly bothered by the fact that vampires in Twilight can walk around in sunlight, (I'm pretty sure that in Stokers Dracula, Dracula himself appeared on the corner of a busy London street in the middle of the day) but I would have preferred a more interesting take on why they are able to move about in sunlight and why, even though they are not harmed by it, they prefer to avoid being out in direct sunlight where possible.


Same here...

Do we really need to type like this? Makes me really not want to read what you have to say. Sorry.

But do you guys get why they sparkle? There is a reason, not "just because".
It's a way to attract..."
I did not say that there WAS a creature in nature that DID sparkle to attract it's prey. I was using that as an example, like the Alligator Snapping Turtle, moss and alge grow on it's head and shell to make it appear like a rock to prey, it also wiggles it's pink tongue out to look make it look like a worm to attract fish, prey. Would you rather the vampire dangle a diamond ring and throw hundred dollar bills to attract it's prey? (I know, you're thinking, that would be better than sparkling)
I understand that you think that it's ridiculous, and that's okay. I get it, It's not for everyone. I was just trying to help those that don't get it, understand the theory behind it. I guess I'm fighting a loosing battle. Oh well, no harm done.
Happy Reading!

She probably just fell on her keyboard. :)
Chameleon wrote: "No, I don't think any predator sparkles to attract prey, but there are animals that glow. As for why they do that, I don't know, but I'm pretty sure that it's not to attract prey..."
Actually, some deep sea predators do that.
They use Bio Luminiscence (<-Spelling?) to attract prey.
Also you have to keep in mind that a vampire would evolve adapted to hunt humans.
Just like Faeries do.


But do you guys get why they sparkle? There is a reason, not "just because".
It's ..."
I understood that you didnt say there was a creature that sparkles to attract its prey I was just curious whether there was one that did, I knew about deep sea fish and the bio luminescence thing but I thought your comment on the snapping turtle was very interesting and something I'd not heard of before.
My main difficulty with the whole sparkling thing is that I don't really see why vampires would need to sparkle, I mean they're super strong and super fast, many are really agile and some are exceptionally stealthy, some transform into animals, some fly and others seduce their prey with an almost mesmerizing or hypnotic gaze. And all this is before we get to the mind readers and the ones with visions of the future.
I understand it's Meyer's story and she can write what she likes, I also get that she dreamt about the meadow scene and wanted to include it, and that she wanted her vampires to be different in some way - I just find it difficult to believe that the ability to sparkle is somehow beneficial to a vampire - but then perhaps it's just me.
Wow I'll shut up now, honestly didn't mean to type so much :)


I also have the right to laugh at the idea and feel it as an embarrassment to vampire world. But I do understand that Twilight was meant to be romance novel, with handsome and beautiful males and females, wrapped with supernatural world in a clever way.

Oh I totally LOVE the Vampire Diaries show! But have you read the books? I have read a few and the show and the books are WAY different!

It says, page 68, and I quote, REACTION TO SUNLIGHT "In direct sunlight, the disparity between human and vampire becomes more obvious. The cellullar membrane of the vampire is not as soft or permeable as in a human cell; it has crystalline properties that cause the surface of vampire skin to react prismatically giving the vampire a glitter-like shimmer in sunlight."
I guess, like some rock surfaces do? Huh, I can understand if some of you still think it's corney. : ) he he he And I'm starting to think, with that deffinition, that maybe the sparkle in the book was not supposed to be as dramatic as it was in the movie. That it was more subtle in the book, giving this "perfect beautiful creature" a kind of glow, rather than a sparkle.
Okay, I'll shut up too! : ) Do I over think the books I like or what?!?! he he he
I think its simply wonderful as it makes them seem more like angels. I think Edward is very much like an angel and not some of the silly ones I have read about recently in a few books like Angels Blood.
If vampires are too wicked I cannot read about them as it scares me too much. I have tried to read Dracula twice since its a classic but each time I have to stop from terror. I like a little scare but not to be totally horrified.
I love to read about truly beautiful things. Another nice vampire is in Lifeblood. Also Forever Knight has a vampire with a conscience who feels sad about what he has done and wants to make amends.
What would anyone want to read about something totally wicked with no redeeming features?
Twilight
Dracula
Angels' Blood
Lifeblood
Forever Knight: Intimations of Mortality
If vampires are too wicked I cannot read about them as it scares me too much. I have tried to read Dracula twice since its a classic but each time I have to stop from terror. I like a little scare but not to be totally horrified.
I love to read about truly beautiful things. Another nice vampire is in Lifeblood. Also Forever Knight has a vampire with a conscience who feels sad about what he has done and wants to make amends.
What would anyone want to read about something totally wicked with no redeeming features?
Twilight
Dracula
Angels' Blood
Lifeblood
Forever Knight: Intimations of Mortality
Excellent point Lindis! I think in Charlaine Harris books the vampires have a glow which Sookie notices but many do not.

Agreed.
There's no need for her vampires to sparkle, or to use any other means of decoy, because there's nothing their prey could do, neither to hurt them nor to escape them.
She's clearly been falling for the trap to give out superpowers to her characters like they were mere candy. Not caring much about the implication.
But then again, I don't think that "twilight" was ever meant to be that closely examined, but rather was planned as a "throw away" novel.
Just like most Romances are.


It s..."
Regarding your comment about overthinking things .... I often wondered that while I was younger and in school in English class. We would take apart a book sentence by sentence and discuss the author's choice of words or metaphor or what have you.... I think it's our teachers' fault that we do that now as adults! LOL!

I'd always assumed that as vampires are technically the living dead, their skin would have a translucent sort of quality and would look sort of dry and wrinkled when they go without drinking blood for any length of time as blood would restore the vitality of the skin. I've heard of cases where corpses have fossilized and crystalized which does sort of tie in with why vampires might sparkle.
I also agree that it's our teachers fault that we take a book apart sentence by sentence and discuss it but by doing so I have definitely come to appreciate some books more that I originally did.

How do you know that? It sounds to me like you've met some in real life. There goes the "gay" comment again...I didn't know gay people sparkled.

I also wrote a series of vampire novels but i was told that vampires are 'over' and couldnt get it published. I put it on amazon, so we'll see. My vampires are much more traditional. As a writer, I think you just try to be creative and come up with something somewhat original (or that's what I did). Sometimes people are going to hate it. Stephanie Meyer is probably laughing all the way to the bank and giving the finger to all of us sparkle-haters on her way. :)


lol....i didnt say that they burned, i meant to say that the vampires in the show vampire diaries burn and it is way better than the one in twilight, that sparkle. and FYI thats my opinion on the book....DONT HATE..

No, they are not dangerous in that way, revealing their 'beauty'. They hide their sparkling skins because they might attract human's attention, and humans are not that kind towards anything different. And there are the shifters to watch them.

There's no need for her vampires to sparkle, or to use any other means of decoy, because there's nothing their prey could do, neither to hurt them nor to escape them......"
Yep. Twilight is romance. Stephenie did a very good job by adding supernatural world to it. She did not even care that her idea of having vampires that could live under the sun is a bit weird. If that was the idea, their number would be enormous since it is extremely difficult to kill them.

i agree

Don't hate?? What am I dealing with here a 12 year old? Who is hating? Your the one hating on the book. Your definitely entitled to your opinion but SO AM I! (see I can use capital letters too) :)

I think vamps in Vampire Diaries are weird too. Can not say that it is better than Twilight. About the fact, Twilight earns more money than Vampire Diaries...
Btw, As Vampire Diaries fans, could you tell me how did a ring could save a vamp from burning under the sun? It was said to be magic yes, but how did it work? Did the ring inject something to their blood and make it stronger?

no a witch puts a spell on it to keep them safe or something.

Nice of you. But I know that. I read Vampire Diaries too. But it did not answer my question though.


My book is called The Superiors (by Lena Hillbrand). It's an ebook on all the websites, amazon, b&n, etc. I'm working on the physical/paper version. (It's also on my profile on Goodreads, but the cover is slightly different for some reason).
Now that I'm done, I can't wait to start reading vampire books again! I tried to stay away from them while I wrote my series so I wouldn't be subconsciously influenced. I really want to read the Anne Rice series some people mentioned earlier.

I love, watch and read most of Vampire stories, even Blood, the last vampire, Japanese version. My best for now is Charlaine Harris' Sookie Stackhouse series. It has the love and dark side in Vampire world. As for Twilight, I do like the series, the romance, not the vampire world. I feel the sparkling part is weird. I think Melissa de la Cruz's Blue Bloods series is better than Twilight.

It probably holds a Gem of Amara. :D

You can get the first three of the Anne Rice Vampire novels in one beautiful leather bound collectors edition from Barnes and Noble. It's about $20. The only drawback is that it's quite large, not one you would throw in your purse! : ) My daughter has it, it's beautiful!
all discussions on this book
|
post a new topic
The Superiors (other topics)
The Superiors (other topics)
The Superiors (other topics)
The Superiors (other topics)
More...
Books mentioned in this topic
The Superiors (other topics)The Superiors (other topics)
The Superiors (other topics)
The Superiors (other topics)
The Superiors (other topics)
More...
Perhaps they have met some vampires before, to have an awesome understanding of what a vampire is. I was not fond of having Stephenie 'glittering' vampires and consider the idea a bit weird but I kept reading the series because I love the romance and Edward and Jasper...:)