Horror Aficionados discussion
What is missing?
message 1:
by
Amanda
(new)
Apr 17, 2011 01:52PM

reply
|
flag



I like the more suspenseful and ghostly stories rather than blood and guts. However, there are some thriller type stories with the guts that is creepy as long as the story is good (like much of Laymon's stuff). I never can seem to find stories that are just like Laymon's and Bryan Smith's.
I wish I wasn't so picky.


I agree with Amanda, the first story I read from Stephen King was the mist. I remember feeling, Wow! I think I did not put it down till I finished reading it. I also feel the same as Tressa, I want something a little more in the story than the usual. Give me a new plot, give me a new twist add something unusual. The only other book I've read recently that gave me that Umphhh was The heart shaped box by Joe Hill. The one I'm reading now I also find it pulls me into the story. It's not exactly horror but it does have a horror twist to it.



We need more books like The Ruins.

We need more books like The ..."
Here, here. That was a great read.

I can't remember who's been on any Ruins discussions that have popped up over the years. But Michael, what did you not like?

I can't remember who's been on any Ruins discussions that have popped up over the years. But Michael, what did you not..."
It has been awhile since I read it but I remember I couldn't abide ANY of the characters. The dialogue was inane. When things just started happening they made no attempts to leave or get help. I like my horror but it has to come with some reality.
Forgive for being so vague but I can't remember lunch yesterday much less a five year old book. I would have to revisit to be more specific but that won't happen because of my feelings while reading.

You might have forgotten one little thing: they couldn't leave the site after the girl stepped over the vine. (view spoiler)
I usually don't care for stories with a bunch of twentysomethings, but I really liked most of the characters, even the silly girls.

I thought it was an extraordinarily realistic portrayal of how things would play out in that situation, and that's why it was so good.


That's what I love about this site and in particular this group we agree to disagree. I really value the varying POV's.

About his review:
I've read many horror books with one-dimensional stock characters, that is NOT what any of these people are, according to ME. He mentions them acting stupid, they didn't act stupid at all. He mentions how the vine isn't explained, I don't think it needs an explanation. It's ancient and it kills and will continue to kill. I think the book is a wonderful study on how the language barrier can lead to some deadly situations. For me that theme ran through the entire book.


If I didn't truly know that Scott loved The Ruins, I would think he was aiming some sarcasm my way. Scott is kinda obtuse.

Absolutely. What is it with everything weird or evil having to be explained to death? That takes the creepiness away. Just take it for what it is and enjoy. Not everything has an explanation for being. Look at The Backstreet Boys and Justin Bieber as perfect examples.





They are just putrid people who need a good beating from some pissed off funeral attendants.


she's all about killing off principal likeable characters midway just for the fun of it
and she looks like this
http://2.bp.blogspot.com/_MZb2WdpX5os...


I know exactly what you mean. I'm wondering if I'm just too old to scare anymore :( And Amanda and others are so right about being immersed in a book.
As a writer, I try very hard to create that kind of world within my books, but it's tough. I bow to the masters like King and Gaiman.
These two books aren't necessarily horror, but they did really immerse me in their tales. I highly recommend them if you haven't read them yet.


Books mentioned in this topic
The Book of Lost Things (other topics)Generation Loss (other topics)