Urban Fantasy discussion
GROUP READ OF THE MONTH--ARCHIVE
>
Magic Bites - September's Group Read - SPOILER FREE
date
newest »

message 1:
by
Theresa
(new)
Aug 27, 2008 07:28AM

reply
|
flag




I must say I hate the fact that vampires are aren't independent beings like other books but it's okay. I don't read many books with magic in them so I'm gonna keep going again! LOL


It's kind of creepy that the vamps are like pets or something. And they are hideous! I imagine them to look like Golum from Lord of the Rings.



Interesting concept.






Anyway, I really enjoyed this book. I found it entertaining (although some of the one-liners were annoying), and fast paced.


Jason (message 10) had mentioned on how someone asked her a question, which sent her into a long tirade on how magic worked. I was more posting in response to that.



Overall, this book didn't really float my train. I kind of felt like Andrews dropped us in the middle of series without any explanation. I liked Curan and the story had an interesting premise, but it just left me flat.
It sounds like bk. 2 is better, so maybe I'll give the author a second chance at some point in the future, but for now I've got to move on to bigger better reads.


Overall I think it was an excellent first effort for the husband/wife team of Ilona and Andrew (they are a team of writers who took their first names to be the "authors" name. I will probably read the second one.
On the "one-liners", I think that was one of the canned sides of the charachter I didn't really enjoy. Her and his (multiple his) seemed forced at times-maybe it was supposed to feel that way- but I didn't get the sense that she was using it to divert her discomfort. I felt more like the author had to constantly have her say something witty/sarcastic/inappropriate; and that apparently all of the males found her irresistible and engaged in her witty banter.
But overall it was a good first effort, and there were a few hooks that I am interested in following up on.

And I had no idea this was a collaborative effort between them. That makes more sense now that I think about their website, lol.
The next book's pretty much at the back of my TBR list right now.

I did notice that it was copyright to both of them, and that the family name was not Andrews. I wasn't sure if they were a writing team or just both owned the copyright, but that makes sense.

Review
And there is a comment posted after the review by Ilona Andrews, the author of the book. She explains why the book was so short.