Terminalcoffee discussion
note: This topic has been closed to new comments.
Feeling Nostalgic? The archives
>
Should google be allowed to digitize all books?
date
newest »


I don't trust Google either. Not one bit. Someone in the article said correctly that a decision about copyrights this big shouldn't be a private settlement/negotiation between parties, it should be legislation passed by Congress.
Don't ever forget Google was collecting emails, passwords, personal info etc. from unsecured WiFi networks as they drove their GoogleMaps vehicles all around the world. Then they pretended they hadn't known exactly what they were collecting, and had collected it by accident. Uh huh.
If you ever go on GoogleMaps, especially in other countries, and look at the pedestrians on the street, or people in their cars, as the Google vehicle is going by, people look hella suspicious. As they ought.
Don't ever forget Google was collecting emails, passwords, personal info etc. from unsecured WiFi networks as they drove their GoogleMaps vehicles all around the world. Then they pretended they hadn't known exactly what they were collecting, and had collected it by accident. Uh huh.
If you ever go on GoogleMaps, especially in other countries, and look at the pedestrians on the street, or people in their cars, as the Google vehicle is going by, people look hella suspicious. As they ought.


This topic has been frozen by the moderator. No new comments can be posted.
What do you think? I don't trust google. Remember, in their quest to digitize all books, and they make it sound like they just want to share information freely, etc., they want to put ads on the screen, etc. So fuck them.
But citing copyright, antitrust and other concerns, Judge Denny Chin said that the settlement went too far. He said it would have granted Google a “de facto monopoly” and the right to profit from books without the permission of copyright owners.
So unless I'm missing something, boo, Google.