The Sword and Laser discussion
The Kingkiller Chronicles
>
Beta reading
date
newest »

Gord wrote: "How did you get the chance to do that? That's pretty awesome!"
I met him at Comic-Con! Felicia actually introduced us.
I met him at Comic-Con! Felicia actually introduced us.

terpkristin wrote: "Wow that's pretty crazy! It had to be an amazing experience. Did you actually have any "feedback" in the beta process for Rothfuss?"
I don't know if he actually changed anything, but there were a few spots where I noted if something was confusing to the reader, for example.
I don't know if he actually changed anything, but there were a few spots where I noted if something was confusing to the reader, for example.
Larry wrote: "That is pretty cool, do you get a copy that says "Confidential" on it?"
I got the book in sections, read and notated each section, and then sent them back as I finished to get the next part!
I got the book in sections, read and notated each section, and then sent them back as I finished to get the next part!


I know writers have always had a circle of people to read their drafts and give input, but maybe I just don't like hearing about it take the form of such a formal process.
That said, in all earnestness I'm sure any input our esteemed S&L elder gave was invaluable. I don't mean to discount how cool the experience is; I'm asking a broader question about the process in general.
aldenoneil wrote: "This feels a little like focus testing a book. Does anyone else feel uncomfortable with this idea?
I know writers have always had a circle of people to read their drafts and give input, but maybe..."
It's more like double checking to make sure the author hasn't become too wrapped up in their own world. By giving readers (especially ones that really care about the story and characters) the chance to take a look at the book early, it gives another point of view that's pretty valuable. It's not changing anything fundamental about the story.
Say, for example, there's a bit of history that's very unclear to the reader. The author doesn't think it's unclear, because it's all in his head already! He *knows* what happened. That may not always come across to someone outside his brain. Or if a character does something totally out of... well, character... maybe there's a reason for it down the line that the author is planning, but to the reader it just doesn't make any sense based on what they know about that character. The feedback could help ease that transition and make it more believable.
I know writers have always had a circle of people to read their drafts and give input, but maybe..."
It's more like double checking to make sure the author hasn't become too wrapped up in their own world. By giving readers (especially ones that really care about the story and characters) the chance to take a look at the book early, it gives another point of view that's pretty valuable. It's not changing anything fundamental about the story.
Say, for example, there's a bit of history that's very unclear to the reader. The author doesn't think it's unclear, because it's all in his head already! He *knows* what happened. That may not always come across to someone outside his brain. Or if a character does something totally out of... well, character... maybe there's a reason for it down the line that the author is planning, but to the reader it just doesn't make any sense based on what they know about that character. The feedback could help ease that transition and make it more believable.

I guess heavy on my mind is a focus group I just participated in for a videogame. Things are becoming so formulaic in gameplay and narrative that all I wanted to do was stand up and say, "No, this is how you should do it. Pay me and I'll fix everything." I didn't do that. With a good author, I doubt they'd listen to that kind of feedback, either.

I got the book in sections, read and notated each section, and then sent them back as I finished to get the ne..."
Hey Veronica, I'm gonna tell Patrick that you think Abercrombie is hot! :)

I got the book in sections, read and notated each section, and then sent them back as I finished to get the ne..."
That is both cool and yet maddening I bet.

Planning on reading it again once it's out? Let us know if any of your suggestions made it in?

Oh, so YOU'RE the one who suggested moar ninja sex!
Anton wrote: "Veronica wrote: "I was planning on mentioning this in the podcast at some point, but it never really came up! Yes, the book that I've been beta reading, in case you hadn't figured it out, was [book..."
Natch!
Natch!
It was an excellent experience, not only because I was able to read the book early (SQUEEEE!!!) but also because I felt like I was part of the creative process, even in some tiny way.
Of course, the book is basically done at the point the beta readers get to it: we're there to find any weird plot holes, errors, omissions, and to just give our impression on how the story *feels*.
I was scared, at first, because I felt like I didn't have anything meaningful to say. But as time goes on and you get more comfortable with the commenting process, the words just start flowing. It feels like you're having a conversation with the author through the pages, and it was pretty damn cool.
Anyhow, I just wanted to share with you guys. It was quite an honor, and it felt like a big responsibility (even though I'm sure it didn't affect the book much at all), and I hope I can do it again sometime!
If you have any questions, let me know!