Book freaks discussion
E-Readers & Technology
>
Do you prefer reading with an e-reader or reading a paper and glue book?
message 101:
by
Mystery Fro
(new)
Mar 21, 2011 06:51AM

reply
|
flag






I'll still buy paper books, but probably only half of what I do now.

But I love being surrounded by "book" books!

Upside-I can take a whole lot of books with me without weighing me down (with an active almost 2 yr, big plus)
Downside- Kindle DOES NOT SUPPORT library lending, so any epubs or pdf's from your library wont read on it, which is completely lame.
Upside-I can go online with the kindle and check facebook and whatnot, and if I finish my books, I can quickly buy a new one, even at 1 AM
Downside- ebooks from amazon.com cost as much or more then the book from the store, 5 bucks for a paperback version of witch and wizard for example, vs 8.99 for ebook version. if you don't buy them from amazon.com you either have to have them emailed to your kindle directly for an additional cost, or connect to your computer. Oh and if you buy an ePub you have to get calibris or some other software to convert it to a mobi file so its readable on the kindle, and sometimes the conversion process messes up.
Upside- Big space saver, and I have filled 6 or so bookshelves and my living room wont fit another bookshelf, so thats a big plus.
Downside- if my friends don't have an e-reader, how can I share with them my latest really good book?
I really wish the kindle did support the DRM (library lending embedded code) features of pdf, and that it supported the ePub files. I don't find it any harder on my eyes then a book, though I do get glare now and then.
it will never replace paper and glue softcover or hardcover books for me. I am a very tactile person and I love the touch of paper, and I love the scent of sun warmed paper and even dust coated novels.
Definitely paper and glue. My dad has a Kindle, but the bad thing about it is that only one person can read it at a time, and all our family's books are on there. Also, it's too expensive to take to school, and I can't read in class (or at lunch and recess, or on the bus, or on a school camp or... I could go on forever)!

And Grace, maybe your dad should get everyone a Kindle so you can all keep reading. After all, it's the educationally smart way to go! ;)

Have you thought about trading books on paperback swap when you and your friends have finished reading them? I started getting way too many books, so I trade them for new ones on paperbackswap.com. I keep only my absolute favorites. Just a thought I wanted tot share.
Nevena wrote: "I have a question for the people who prefer an e-reader Do you guys find that you always read from your e-reader or do you guys still sometimes read paper books?"
I have a nook and even though I really enjoy reading on it I will never completely give up paper books. There is just something about the feel of a book in my hand, especially one of my favorites, that appeals to me on some deeper level. Its almost, for lack of a better word, spiritual.
I have a nook and even though I really enjoy reading on it I will never completely give up paper books. There is just something about the feel of a book in my hand, especially one of my favorites, that appeals to me on some deeper level. Its almost, for lack of a better word, spiritual.



Besides, if everyone else stops reading the old paper and glue, that means there'll be more used books for me! Muwhahaha.

Like Kayci, I use spatial recall which I can't get on the Kindle. I can't imagine really using the Kindle to study.
But for many novels, although I have some difficulties with the ereader, it certainly is easier to carry around. And it's great getting all the classics for free-and much easier to read than off my pc.
I have grown to love mine (which I call Lady Grace) dearly.
For me, it's not either/or. It's both/and. I love paper and glue AND ereaders.
I like books every and any way I can get them.

I still do enjoy reading regular books and cruise the used book stores often. My shelves are loaded with to-be-reads.
If I am reading a book with a map in it (fantasy) then I will buy the reg. book. I find flipping back and forth much easier in a reg. book.
So, I love my Nook and use it about 70% of my reading now.

The more I am using the Kindle the more I like it. At first I was overwhelmed seeing all those book titles of things I had on there, then I started using Collections and now I don't have as many pages to go through.
If I am reading a paperbook and have to go back and look for something I tend to remember whether it was on the left or right, bottom or top of the page, can't do that with the Kindle.
Mostly I like being able to get Kindle books for free or for 99 cents.
For the person who wrote about library lending; Amazon hasn't released a date but books will be available for the Kindle before the end of this year.



to be honest i don't own a kindle but i have used it for almost a week and no doubt it is a great device, but at the same time (i wish) it will never replace the paper books.
paper books are unique( though they may seem identical )
paper books u can hold in hand and feel it's value,but with kindle u always feel kindles value not the books.
i like to have my books well maintained in a neat shelf, so when i'll turn 80 (some 60 years from now)
i can show my grand~grand children's what a real book looks and feels like.
coz by that time paper-books will be museum item.
paper books are unique( though they may seem identical )
paper books u can hold in hand and feel it's value,but with kindle u always feel kindles value not the books.
i like to have my books well maintained in a neat shelf, so when i'll turn 80 (some 60 years from now)
i can show my grand~grand children's what a real book looks and feels like.
coz by that time paper-books will be museum item.

Actually, I prefer taking my Kindle outside to read, especially near water and sand. That can play havoc with a paper book, but the Kindle stays dry in the cover and is easy to read in outside light.



Not to mention how many b ooks you can take on vacation. LOL








Plus, the battery never dies in a paper book.







Wow! You must've had them for a really long time! My books have never faded! I can see how having an e-reader would make this a lot cheaper!

A book printed on poor quality paper tends to fade over time. A book printed on acid-free paper will hold up for more than a lifetime. That is why books printed in the 19th century often look fresher than a book printed in the 20th century. The introduction of bleach to the papermaking process resulted in a poorer quality, but cheaper, paper.

Wow! That's really interesting. So is it just assumed that all books have acid in them now-a-days? Or does it depend on the publishing company?

Most books have acid in the paper, and it is a big problem for libraries. Their collections are deteriorating just sitting on the shelf. If you go to an art supply store, you can find acid-free paper. The touch and feel is very different.

Books mentioned in this topic
Hungry For You (other topics)World War Z: An Oral History of the Zombie War (other topics)