Harry Potter discussion
Characters
>
Who Else Would You Kill Off?
date
newest »


Dolores Umbridge was one of the most detestable characters I have encountered in a long time. I think it would have been poetic justice to have "I am a pompous, self-righteous ass" permanently enscribed on her forehead. Then we could run the quill through her :)




I'm on board with everyone else: definitely Umbridge! What a pompous bitch! I think I actually threw a temper tantrum when she punished Harry. That's a woman who deserved to have a voodoo doll made of her and have it tortured and put threw the ringer! I love that the quill was how she died! Although, that voodoo doll would have been fun too!
"Umbridge! Umbridge! We don't care!
Spank her bum and pull her hair!!" I LOVE IT! I think I'm going to say that all day while I'm killing time here at work. Woo hoo!


Exactly, Umbridge! I don't believe that miserable hag survived through all of it! She's one of the characters I loathe.... Ugh! Even thinking about it is making me angry.... She was one of the reasons that Sirius died(atleast I blame her)

I might choose Bellatrix because then Dobby and Sirius would be alive...


Out of personal spite, I think Dolores Umbridge could..."
Oh my GOD, she finally put Ron and Hermione together, and then you would kill one of them!?!? NO WAY!!
And I agree with everyone else--seeing Umbridge get it would have been very satisfying.
Umbridge... Ron (cause someone in the 3 could have died... J.K Rowling said she was maybe going to kill of Ron) and maybe... um... i think thats it...
yes, I think that if one of the three had to die it would be Ron...however, I'm glad she didn't kill him, because then it would have seemed like EVERYONE was dying...I've read books where most of the main characters die, and it's just too much; it goes from a heartbreaking but unavoidable casualty of war to the impression that the author is deliberately and maliciously killing off all the characters that have been so wonderfully developed thus far.
J.K.Rowling walked a fine line between an and-all-lived-happily-ever-after and a bloodbath, and personally I think that she made the right decisions (except maybe Fred...but let's not get into that).
J.K.Rowling walked a fine line between an and-all-lived-happily-ever-after and a bloodbath, and personally I think that she made the right decisions (except maybe Fred...but let's not get into that).


Rita Skeeter should be shut in her beetle-jar for the rest of her life.
And any Death Eaters who are still alive (is Dolohov still alive?) and killed people I love in the series - remaining Death Eaters aside from Malfoy can go to hell by the express route.

I don't really know... I don't think the book would have ended the same way if any others had died, but if I had to choose one person I would choose Filch.

Not that I wanted him to die...
Personally, I'm glad Ron and Hermione both survived. Otherwise, they couldn't date after the war.
Umbridge's death would be cool. It would be rather interesting if Harry killed her off.
With Rita Skeeter, well I would kill her off too, but I don't know if it should be Hermione, Harry, Ron or even Viktor who kills her.
Umbridge's death would be cool. It would be rather interesting if Harry killed her off.
With Rita Skeeter, well I would kill her off too, but I don't know if it should be Hermione, Harry, Ron or even Viktor who kills her.

Out of personal spite, I think Dolores Umbridge could have been impaled on her own quill, or stomped by a centaur.
Ditto for Rita Skeeter. She could have bought the farm as an "embedded" war correspondent and had a pike "embedded" in her.
I'm surprised Ron and Hermione both survived. They seemed a bit "an heir and a spare."
TK Kenyon
www.tkkenyon.com