Goodreads Librarians Group discussion
Book & Author Page Issues
>
"In Death" series numbering
date
newest »


http://www.jdrobb.com/books/quick.html


I agree with you. The half #'ing system has always helped me distinguish between the full books & the short story/novellas.

This is actually #8 and not #7.5. So when fixing the series number to #8, In Death book that is numbered #8 will have to be #9 and so on. I found the definitive answer at Overdrive. http://search.overdrive.com/TitleInfo...
http://www.fantasticfiction.co.uk/r/j... <--proper numbering shown
http://search.overdrive.com/TitleInfo... shows Fantasy in Death to be #37 and it matches Fantastic Fiction.

http://www.jdrobb.com/book..."
All that list shows is that it's not a full length novel and instead included in anthology. That says nothing definitive about numbering.
I think Overdrive and Penguin have it correct in terms of numbering.


This is actually #8 and not #7.5. So when fixing the series number to #8, In Death book that is numbered #8 will have to be #9 and so on. I found the definitive answe..."
Overdrive & Fantastic Fiction seem to be sites just like Goodreads. They have just chosen to # all the books in this particular series with whole #'s. That doesn't necessarily make it the 'right' or 'wrong' way - just their way. Every site has their own policy or SOP, Goodreads is just different from theirs. I think that if JDR wanted them #'d in a certain way she would have it listed on her site.


If this is so important to you, you have the option of becoming a librarian and starting a secondary, chronologcal listing for the series. Or you could try to find a current librarian who agrees with you, who's willing to do that work.

In your link, I don't see any #'ing done by JDR, just books listed. However on this particular page, http://www.jdrobb.com/books/quick.html you'll see the full books listed seperately from the short stories/novellas. IMO, this proves Beth's point that the full novels are the #'d parts of the series while the shorts are additions to the series. While Missing may be #8 due to publication date, it fits between the full stories.
Beth wrote: "I agree it should not be changed. The novels are the numbers in the series. The half #'s show where the other stories are published, but are not a part of the series of *novels.*"
Completely agree. There's a reason this method was arrived at, after much discussion. It works!
Completely agree. There's a reason this method was arrived at, after much discussion. It works!

On the JD Robb website, it lists Fantasy in Death as book #30 on the 'all books' page. You only arrive at that number by counting all the full-length novels - if you were to add in the novellas, etc published that number would be significantly higher. I think that demonstrates that the GR system is perfectly accurate in this case.
Fantastic Fiction has Midnight in Death listed as #8 and Good reads has it listed as 7.5. I think Goodreads is incorrect and Fantastic Fiction is correct. If that is the case, can someone please fix all of the In Death series to match Fantastic Fiction?