Goodreads Librarians Group discussion

note: This topic has been closed to new comments.
1439 views
Book & Author Page Issues > Please delete this book! (pt. 5)

Comments Showing 951-980 of 980 (980 new)    post a comment »
1 2 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 20 next »
dateUp arrow    newest »

message 951: by Eva-Marie (new)

Eva-Marie Nevarez (evamarie3578) | 753 comments I got that one JG.


message 952: by rivka, Former Moderator (new)

rivka | 45177 comments Mod
It needed to be deleted first, Eva.

I got it.


message 953: by Melody (new)

Melody (runningtune) | 13300 comments I deleted it Bogging.


message 954: by Susanna (new)

Susanna (jb_slasher) | 50 comments Please delete this edition?


message 955: by Melody (new)

Melody (runningtune) | 13300 comments Got it Susanna.


message 956: by Susanna (new)

Susanna (jb_slasher) | 50 comments Thanks, Melody :)


message 957: by Hope (new)

Hope | 25 comments This "book" is really just a placeholder for the entire Sookie Stackhouse series.The Southern Vampire-Sookie Stackhouse series A lot of people seem to have added it, instead of the books individually.


message 958: by rivka, Former Moderator (new)

rivka | 45177 comments Mod
There's a 7-volume set. I merged it to that.


message 959: by Sherry (new)

Sherry (ssaccoliti) | 601 comments http://www.goodreads.com/book/show/18...


Wrong cover (dated after the publication) and no ISBN number


message 960: by rivka, Former Moderator (new)

rivka | 45177 comments Mod
It's not the wrong cover; the ISBN was reused, but that edition was first published in 1986. I restored its ISBN.


message 961: by Lisa (last edited Jul 14, 2009 04:55PM) (new)

Lisa Vegan (lisavegan) | 2400 comments Thanks Rivka! That's the one on my shelf.

Edit: Actually, I read The Hobbit in '66 and the three trilogy books in '67 but...


message 962: by Sherry (new)

Sherry (ssaccoliti) | 601 comments rivka wrote: "It's not the wrong cover; the ISBN was reused, but that edition was first published in 1986. I restored its ISBN."

http://www.goodreads.com/book/show/65...

Thanks.


message 963: by Sherry (new)

Sherry (ssaccoliti) | 601 comments rivka wrote: "It's not the wrong cover; the ISBN was reused, but that edition was first published in 1986. I restored its ISBN."

Re-used ISBN's (???) ughhhh!

Is this like re-using SSNs?


message 964: by Sherry (new)

Sherry (ssaccoliti) | 601 comments Lisa wrote: "Thanks Rivka! That's the one on my shelf.

Edit: Actually, I read The Hobbit in '66 and the three trilogy books in '67 but..."


Thanks --- (This is why it's good to have someone else checking.)


message 965: by rivka, Former Moderator (new)

rivka | 45177 comments Mod
Sherry wrote: "Re-used ISBN's (???) ughhhh!

Is this like re-using SSNs? "


Heh. No, this is perfectly legal, albeit annoying.

And I got that last one.


message 966: by Sherry (last edited Jul 15, 2009 03:38AM) (new)

Sherry (ssaccoliti) | 601 comments http://www.goodreads.com/book/show/61...

I corrected the author spelling and now need to delete this version. Think it was meant as a review ...


message 967: by rivka, Former Moderator (new)

rivka | 45177 comments Mod
Gone.


message 969: by Meghan (new)

Meghan (reader_meg) | 6 comments This book is on here twice. This one can be deleted: http://www.goodreads.com/book/show/66...


message 970: by rivka, Former Moderator (new)

rivka | 45177 comments Mod
Got both. Meghan, for future reference, it is helpful if you combine the edition to be deleted with the edition to be kept. Thanks!


message 971: by Meghan (new)

Meghan (reader_meg) | 6 comments rivka wrote: "Got both. Meghan, for future reference, it is helpful if you combine the edition to be deleted with the edition to be kept. Thanks!"
I actually did try that, but when I clicked on "combine editions," only one of them showed up, so I wasn't able to. But thank you!



message 972: by rivka, Former Moderator (new)

rivka | 45177 comments Mod
That's because the authors were in reverse order on the other. I flipped this one.


message 973: by Cynthia (new)

Cynthia Armistead Newman (technomom) | 159 comments Need a super-librarian to delete this one: The Uncookbook

I can't find a record of any "Uncookbook" anywhere, except as part of a subtitle for a raw food cookbook. Only author name given is "Johnson" and there are no ISBNs. There are no ratings or reviews, but it says it needs a superlibrarian.


message 974: by rivka, Former Moderator (new)

rivka | 45177 comments Mod
No ratings or reviews, but someone DID shelve it. I merged it with the most likely candidate: http://www.goodreads.com/book/show/39...


message 975: by rivka, Former Moderator (last edited Jul 15, 2009 07:05PM) (new)

rivka | 45177 comments Mod
What do you mean by "canceled"?

Also, it's in the Amazon database, so deleting it was counterproductive. I reimported it.


message 976: by rivka, Former Moderator (new)

rivka | 45177 comments Mod
It seems to be "hidden" in Amazon's database. Searches don't bring it up, but the API (which GR uses to import books) clearly does.

I'm finding varying info on this edition; I'd leave it for now.


message 977: by Cynthia (new)

Cynthia Armistead Newman (technomom) | 159 comments I saw that title, Rivka, but the author names were so different that I wasn't confident enough to combine them. Thanks!


message 978: by rivka, Former Moderator (new)

rivka | 45177 comments Mod
Well, it was better than just deleting it without combining it with anything, I figure. (And her note on where the book was recommended made sense with this title.)


message 979: by Cait (new)

Cait (tigercait) | 4988 comments Comments (showing 951-1,000 of 1,000)

...Perhaps it's time for part 6 of this function? :)


message 980: by rivka, Former Moderator (new)

rivka | 45177 comments Mod
Sure.

But hey, look! They fixed the commas. ;)


1 2 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 20 next »
back to top
This topic has been frozen by the moderator. No new comments can be posted.