Ling AP Lit. and Comp. 2010-11 discussion
What is Truth?
>
Absolute Control of Party
date
newest »



Consider Winton and Julia. Although they engage in an affair, an infringement on the rule that Party members not have physical attraction toward one another, for an extended period of time in the house of a Thought Police Agent, it is not until they obtain the book of the Brotherhood and swear their allegiance to it does the Thought Police act and arrest them. In oppressing Winston and Julia, the Party compelled them to consider joining the vanguard of the revolution, and thus lured them into a trap from which we have yet to see them escape.

The second point I would like to make is that most people do not know what they are missing in being denied sexual relations. As most members do not remember a pre-Revolution time, this lifestyle is the only one they know. They do not think to question it, and therefore, are not thinking of alternative lifestyles. Therefore, it has never crossed their minds to break the rules and rebel against the Party, as was mentioned.

Through Wiston, especially through his affair with Julia, we see that the sexual desire cannot be completely killed. However, in order to exert total control, the Party tries to kill it as it tries to kill all other pleasure people have.
Do you think by trying to kill the sexual instinct, the Party has achieved the opposite- actually encouraging people to break the rules and wanting to rebel against the Party?
I think so. If the Party allowed its members some pleasure, it may be more successful in controlling them. Winston is thoroughly miserable at the beginning of the book. However, when he regularly meets with Julia, his "life had ceased to be intolerable, he had no longer any impulse to make faces at the telescreen or shout curses at the top of his voice" (124). If the Party were to make some pleasures legal, Winston may not have such strong hate towards the Party.