Art Lovers discussion
Art Lovers News Corner
>
Andrew Wyeth forgery uncovered
date
newest »


I'd never thought about how difficult it would be to copy a watercolor exactly. In watercolor, you put it down and it is what it is. Not much room for correction.




My understanding, based on the facts presented to me by the Inquirer's reporter, is that this particular forgery was introduced into the market a few owners back. If that's true, then the current owner, the one who was attempting to auction the item, would be the victim of the crime, not one of its perpetrators. Of course, only time will tell whether this is the correct interpretation of events.
The chances of the actual forger being caught or punished are not good. Law enforcement doesn't devote tremendous resources to art forgery investigations, and proving the forger's intent to deceive (that is to say, his intent to commit fraud) is extremely difficult.
One standard evasion of forgers, when caught, is to say their only desire was to learn from the master--in this case, Wyeth--by copying his style; the false signature, they might claim, was added later by someone else, etc., etc. The rarity of criminal prosecutions for art forgery is among the factors that make it such a low risk crime for the people who perpetrate it.
http://www.philly.com/inquirer/front_...