Dianetics
discussion
really?!?!
date
newest »

message 1:
by
Myra
(new)
-
rated it 1 star
Oct 19, 2010 10:10AM

reply
|
flag
Yes, Ma'am... Scientology is the go to thing for people who are a marble or two away from letting go of the handle bars of reality.
Famous people are the first ones to fall for this type of lunacy because they are surrounded by "yes-people" and people who always tell you "yes" and nod and feed their fevered egos.
These people don't live within reality.
Famous people are the first ones to fall for this type of lunacy because they are surrounded by "yes-people" and people who always tell you "yes" and nod and feed their fevered egos.
These people don't live within reality.

You can believe whatever you want. If you want to believe that you are driven by a dead alien spirit that's fine, but don't blame your need to believe in something so badly that you are delving into an obvious con on the fact that you are a writer. It's insulting to those of us writers who know better.
This is the man that wrote Dianetics. L Ron Hubbard... a fucking lunatic who was diagnosed with severe schizophrenia. This is what scientologists believe and lie about believing while calling out respectable people of medicine as hacks.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xwlzBl...
Go figure.
This is the man that wrote Dianetics. L Ron Hubbard... a fucking lunatic who was diagnosed with severe schizophrenia. This is what scientologists believe and lie about believing while calling out respectable people of medicine as hacks.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xwlzBl...
Go figure.

I misread your post. It came off to me that you were interested in seeking the church out as an avenue of belief not just simply research. I apologize, religion, especially obvious con jobs like scientology is a touchy subject for me. Mainly because I think people should be more evolved and have a higher in intelligence than falling for something so insane and false.
I am not "slandering" your skills as writer, either. That would be ignorant of me being the fact that I haven't read anything you've written. And even if I didn't like your style, I still wouldn't hold that against you.
Scientology is a cult and cults have been something of an interest to me so I have been reading about them and lightly investigating them since I was a 15, I'm 32 now. Human behavior is something of an interest to me and mostly what I write about in my novels.
There's no slander on my part when it comes to Hubbard or his ilk. The facts about the supposed church speak for themselves.
I am not "slandering" your skills as writer, either. That would be ignorant of me being the fact that I haven't read anything you've written. And even if I didn't like your style, I still wouldn't hold that against you.
Scientology is a cult and cults have been something of an interest to me so I have been reading about them and lightly investigating them since I was a 15, I'm 32 now. Human behavior is something of an interest to me and mostly what I write about in my novels.
There's no slander on my part when it comes to Hubbard or his ilk. The facts about the supposed church speak for themselves.


Well said.

Hi, have you ever properly read a book written by L. Ron Hubbard? Have you ever received auditing? Have you ever been in a Church and had a tour?
"Lightly" investigating something does not give you the right to be rude and disrespectful.
Before replying, make sure you read the guidelines of this website--you have already fallen outside of them.
all discussions on this book
|
post a new topic