Terminalcoffee discussion

102 views
Helping You To Know The News > Have you "dabbled in witchcraft"? > Stevie Nicks LUHHHerve fest/Heidi explains different terms for masturbation

Comments Showing 51-74 of 74 (74 new)    post a comment »
« previous 1 2 next »
dateUp arrow    newest »

message 51: by [deleted user] (new)

Jacks, my sister and my cousin were playing that when I was 5 or six. We were alone at my grandmother's (the folks were out with the grandparents) and they were running up and down the hall from the bathroom squealing. Then, they threw me in the bathroom and held the door shut. I was too short to reach the light and just cried my eyes out.

To this day I can only pee in a dark bathroom if I sing Jesus Loves Me to myself...


Jackie "the Librarian" | 8991 comments I've had to force myself to be rational, Ames, and look in the mirror in the dark to get over my fear - see, Jackie, no creepy lady with long fingernails is in there, just me with bedhead.
Still, I don't LIKE it!


message 53: by [deleted user] (new)

I know it's irrational. I still sing.


Jackie "the Librarian" | 8991 comments Whatever works! :)


message 55: by Heidi (new)

Heidi (heidihooo) | 10825 comments My friend Amy and I always chickened out when we'd try to do the Bloody Mary thing when we were kids. We'd only get around to saying it twice before we'd turn on the lights and start saying the rosary. I can't watch CandyMan because it's too like the Bloody Mary thingy...

When I was in junior high, we played Light As A Feather, Stiff As A Board at a Halloween slumber party... scared the piss out of me when one of the gals seems to float above our hands. We kept playing it, though.


message 56: by [deleted user] (new)

Taking notes: *Choking the chicken means.....*


message 57: by Jim (new)

Jim | 6484 comments Its like "slapping the salami"


message 58: by [deleted user] (new)

"Twirling the baton"


message 59: by Phil (new)

Phil | 11852 comments Flogging the bishop.


message 60: by [deleted user] (new)

"Dating Rosie Redpalm and her five daughters"


message 61: by Phil (new)

Phil | 11852 comments Greasing the flagpole.


message 62: by Jim (new)

Jim | 6484 comments Paddle the pickle.


message 63: by Phil (new)

Phil | 11852 comments Hittin' the slit.
Itchin' the ditch.
Tickling the taco.
Rubbin' the nubbin.

They never end.


message 64: by [deleted user] (new)

"Rubbin the nubbin"...that's priceless!


message 65: by RandomAnthony (new)

RandomAnthony | 14536 comments Christine O'Donnell, from a recent debate:

"Where in the Constitution is the separation of church and state?" O'Donnell asked him.

When Coons responded that the First Amendment bars Congress from making laws respecting the establishment of religion, O'Donnell asked: "You're telling me that's in the First Amendment?"


Oh dear.

http://www.npr.org/templates/story/st...


message 66: by Ken (new)

Ken (playjerist) | 721 comments No small reflection on the disordered mind of the current Republican primary voter/ Republican base.


message 67: by Ken (new)

Ken (playjerist) | 721 comments Initially I was of the same view, Michelle. But in the exchange, once Coons recites directly from the First Amendment, and she responds by asking, “That’s in the First Amendment?” one has to assume she indeed is that lost. However, I do believe that in general she was attempting to advance that hard shell view that Christianity was baked into the Constitution by the Founders. It has become a fairly standard view among our increasingly radicalized brothers and sisters on the right to regard Thomas Jefferson as a nefarious Deist bastard for declaring that the amendment built, "a wall of separation between Church and State.”

I will say, O’Donnell is one of our more affable political lunatics.


message 68: by Ken (new)

Ken (playjerist) | 721 comments They do have that startling propensity, with many subjects, in fact most, to proclaim an alternative factual universe, outside of which the rest of us were “mistaught.”

It has to be a testament to their commitment to sequestration in their enclosed milieu, and the power of the demonizing there of outside media, educators, experts, public intellectuals and global consensus that they feel so comfortable and secure in their singular alternate world.


message 69: by Ken (new)

Ken (playjerist) | 721 comments Elvira's version of the "I am not a witch" ad has its moments:

http://www.boingboing.net/2010/10/19/...


message 70: by Lori (last edited Oct 21, 2010 03:37PM) (new)

Lori There's an excellent article in the most recent issue of Time or Newsweek about how the tea partiers are using the constitution these days the same way the GOP used the Bible in the past. A Most Holy Book, that we need to follow To The Word with no change as we evolved. Ya know, like Jefferson said we should change. So the Bible is written by God and the Constitution is based on the Holy Writ.

Hey, there's a rumor going around that one of the women who is beating the well established incumbent has a secret that said incumbent doesn't want to drag in but might anyway as the opposition plays even dirtier. The feeling is that of course it's an abortion by either Meg or Christine who preach right to life.


message 71: by Ken (new)

Ken (playjerist) | 721 comments The tea baggers, essentially nothing more than the same old hard core of the Republican right really did achieve something of a public relations coup, when, after the Republican brand went completely into the toilet, the media and punditocracy re-branded them The Tea Party Movement.

They do attempt to invoke the Constitution in the same frivolous and selective fashion as the Christian right long has attempted to do with the Bible. But virtually every reference to the Constitution I’ve heard from the current crop of Republicans has been staggeringly ignorant, a malignant bastardization, complete reinvention, or moonbat crazy.


message 72: by Phil (new)

Phil | 11852 comments Tea baggers. Yuck.

Saw this description of their ideology in beeryblog today.

In the Bagger System, myths and magical gods explain all things. There is the free market god who fixes homelessness, hunger and poverty. There is the deregulation god, who fixes joblessness. There is, of course, the no taxes god who fills government coffers and fixes the deficit. There are lesser gods too, but these are the three main gods and they report, of course, to Almighty God. It is He who bequeathed to his chosen people the Declaration of Independence, the Constitution and predatory capitalism, praise be his name.


message 73: by janine (new)

janine | 7709 comments Like in the caste system?


message 74: by Lobstergirl, el principe (new)

Lobstergirl | 24818 comments Mod
Misha wrote: "No, no. The free market god doesn't fix homeless, hunger and poverty, because the lazy, shiftless people experiencing those things brought it all on themselves and if they'd just go ahead and die i..."

Right - therefore, problem fixed.

If everyone who is sick, hungry, and poor dies, those problems are solved.


« previous 1 2 next »
back to top