Q&A with Josh Lanyon discussion
note: This topic has been closed to new comments.
ARCHIVE (General Topics)
>
Writing Questions for Josh

I'm doing the same. I suspect most of us are. But when, as you said, books that are chock full of kink seem to be selling the best, it's difficult not to question one's standards.
My publishers haven't really been riding me about sex scenes -- thank goodness. Rather, readers' buying habits have been preying on my mind. Aside from the personal-earnings issue, I'd hate like hell to see this genre equated with and defined by its sexual content. That's just wrong on so many levels.
Ah, pfff. I'm too set in my ways to change anyway, so the point in my case is probably moot. Besides, I can't imagine convincingly writing "obligatory" anything.
Fair enough, publishers are in the business of making money.
That said, I think it depends on the publisher.
That said, I think it depends on the publisher.
K.Z. wrote: "Josh wrote: "In other words, I'm writing for readers like myself."
I'm doing the same. I suspect most of us are. But when, as you said, books that are chock full of kink seem to be selling the bes..."
I agree. I don't want to see this genre defined by all the sex. It's definitely not right at all. And probably is part of the reason why I don't want to add to it, unless the story requires it.
I'm doing the same. I suspect most of us are. But when, as you said, books that are chock full of kink seem to be selling the bes..."
I agree. I don't want to see this genre defined by all the sex. It's definitely not right at all. And probably is part of the reason why I don't want to add to it, unless the story requires it.

I think I've been writing more sex-scenes than I used to, but I don't put them in to spice up the story or because I think it'll sell better. They just fit my boys at that time ...
I like writing scenes that only show part of what my boys are up to, the scene might end, but the boys are really not done yet :) the rest will happen behind the curtains.
I like the idea of leaving something to the readers' imagination, and that includes some fading to black moments :)
As for my own reading preferences: I can take them or leave them. I might skip over sex scenes because they either don't add anything or I'm just not interested/in the mood. But in a book with fade to black, I might wish I could take a peek ;)
ETA: my sex scenes are always slaves to the plot, though, no matter now many turn up.

I'm doing the same. I suspect most of us are. But when, as you said, books that are chock full of kink seem to be selling the bes..."
Yes, I tend to do that as well.
I write stories that are in my heart and that I'd like to read, and that I hope readers are going to like.

*ducks*"
It's not about "like" or "dislike".... It's how the merch. is put together. ;-)
Exactly what Reggie just said. I've got some jars from IKEA that I put my silverware in. I love them. True, they're not what you think of when you think of IKEA, but still.



I think it's not just the sex, but trope & plot, even characters, everything can be overdone. That's why I don't get why people love Harlequin so much. They're just same stories with different names. Harlequin also has very strict formula & guidelines for their writers.

Cleon wrote: "I happen to like IKEA. A lot.
*ducks*"
but this is perfectly all right -- for readers and for writers.
I mean what could possibly be more subjective than our preferences in romance?
*ducks*"
but this is perfectly all right -- for readers and for writers.
I mean what could possibly be more subjective than our preferences in romance?
Cleon wrote: "I think it's not just the sex, but trope & plot, even characters, everything can be overdone. That's why I don't get why people love Harlequin so much. They're just same stories with different names. Harlequin also has very strict formula & guidelines for their writers.
..."
In fairness, so is a lot of m/m.
Isn't that really what we're talking about when we talk about an expectation of erotic content? It's formula.
And that Harlequin formula that is so often denegrated often has to do with structure and plotting and character arcs. These are not bad things. These are things that the majority of m/m writers could learn from.
..."
In fairness, so is a lot of m/m.
Isn't that really what we're talking about when we talk about an expectation of erotic content? It's formula.
And that Harlequin formula that is so often denegrated often has to do with structure and plotting and character arcs. These are not bad things. These are things that the majority of m/m writers could learn from.

I haven't had a publisher recommend more of the smexin, but let's get real. For my stuff, the odds a pub would think I'd need more are remote. ;-p

I like the schizo analogy (although Multiple Personality Disorder might be just as useful, IDK), but I have a tiny little argument. Sex is natural, and it's a natural part of the human psyche. A hell of a lot happens during sex that can give you more insight into the true character than a scene with dialogue. It's certainly not always handled this way, and plenty of people don't use it that way. But some people (ahem) do. OTOH, some people can show more with a short scene of dialogue *cough*Josh*cough* than I can with a 2k sex scene.
Or, I just really like to write sex. It's a little of both, actually, I suspect.

.."
It occurred to..."
LOL

So my thinking is that if one wants to starts writing less erotic content, ones skill at writing needs to be higher to succeed. Personally, I think my skill is up to selling erotica, I suspect it's not up yet to selling on the basis of my story constructinon, ability to create tension, etc. KZ, you're an awesome writer. I'd certainly go for it. Know damn well I'd read it.
I dunno, even factoring that in, it may be that the monetary 'value' of erotica is still way too high to make a switch fiscally sound even for a great writer. But I do think that aspect plays a role. Hope that all made sense.
Note: was intentionally decoupling fiscal from the 'writing as self-fulfillment' aspect.

You make sense, but I honestly never looked at it that way.
then again, I never thought about writers writing m/m because 'that's where the money is' either. (sometimes I think it'll take another 100 years for me to outgrow my naivety)

For the record. I still love writing sex. :p But I could see myself growing tired of it. My stories tend to be bimodal -- some are sex heavy, some have precious little. The sex heavy ones are the ones that get read.

sssh ... it's actually 2am here ... high time for me to go to be (specially since youngest has volleyball match at 9:30)
Sometimes I hate having kids playing sports and being a dutiful mother who watches the matches ... especially after coming home late after an evening of playing cards *sigh*
Good night :D

Oh, hell yeah. I started out writing m/f for Ellora's Cave, and the very first time I submitted a novel, I was told to insert more sex scenes. The pressure never really let up. Obviously, I got tired of it. ;-)

Yep. *sigh* My point exactly.
I certainly don't recoil from the physical aspects of m/m romance. Quite like it, actually. :) But I've always believed less is more, as long as the "less" is deftly handled.
Too much emphasis on Le Boink or La Kink -- too many lengthy, repetitive scenes -- leave me bored, impatient, and ultimately numb. Sexual excess seems to negate both the physical heat and emotional warmth of a relationship. It seems to flatten the characters and abort their development. It can certainly suck the marrow right out of a plot.
But that's just my reaction. Plenty of readers, maybe a majority of readers, can't get enough explicit sex in fiction. In fact, they seek it out (as you mentioned, Oco). So I'm likely in the minority.

then again, I never thought about writers writing m/m because 'that's where the money is' either. (sometimes I think it'll take another 100 years for me to outgrow my naivety) "
Naivete is a gift. Besides, you aren't the gullible one when it comes to writing MM because "that's where the money is". :-P



To me, comparing erotica or the more graphic erotic rom with less graphic erotic rom is apples & oranges. I like them both. They're both fruit, but they are different fruits. One isn't necessarily worse or weaker than the other. They're just different.
It saddens me to see erotica & heavily erotic rom denigrated. Especially being that I write it.

I've read and written plenty of erotic content. I just find it off-putting when there's so much it makes my eyes glaze over. As in anything related to any of the arts, it's a matter of personal taste.
Anne wrote: "I like the schizo analogy (although Multiple Personality Disorder might be just as useful, IDK), but I have a tiny little argument. Sex is natural, and it's a natural part of the human psyche. A hell of a lot happens during sex that can give you more insight into the true character than a scene with dialogue. It's certainly not always handled this way, and plenty of people don't use it that way. But some people (ahem) do. OTOH, some people can show more with a short scene of dialogue *cough*Josh*cough* than I can with a 2k sex scene.
..."
I completely agree, Anne.
My rule for writing sex scenes is to make sure that whatever occurs in these scenes could not occur in any other context. And that the scenes will remain unique to these characters and their dynamic.
Which is why some of my books have very little sex and some have comparatively a lot. It totally goes by the particular story.
..."
I completely agree, Anne.
My rule for writing sex scenes is to make sure that whatever occurs in these scenes could not occur in any other context. And that the scenes will remain unique to these characters and their dynamic.
Which is why some of my books have very little sex and some have comparatively a lot. It totally goes by the particular story.
Reggie wrote: "{Non-writing Q for Josh}- I am going to add to my JL collection as books are re-released. Is any outlet more advantageous for you than others? Amazon, ARE, B&N- I think were the choices? I don't ca..."
Amazon pays a slightly better royalty rate than the other two (about 5%) so it's not enough to be worth inconveniencing yourself. Whatever works for you will work for me.
Amazon pays a slightly better royalty rate than the other two (about 5%) so it's not enough to be worth inconveniencing yourself. Whatever works for you will work for me.
Kari wrote: "It saddens me to see erotica & heavily erotic rom denigrated. Especially being that I write it.
..."
One of the reasons its denigrated (at least in this context) is because, unfortunately, sex sells whether it's well-written or not. There is a market for it and that market is not always discerning.
That doesn't mean that erotica is easier to write than anything else, just that it's easier to get away with NOT writing it well.
Well-written erotica is as challenging as any other well-written action. It's not easy to write well. Period.
..."
One of the reasons its denigrated (at least in this context) is because, unfortunately, sex sells whether it's well-written or not. There is a market for it and that market is not always discerning.
That doesn't mean that erotica is easier to write than anything else, just that it's easier to get away with NOT writing it well.
Well-written erotica is as challenging as any other well-written action. It's not easy to write well. Period.

Yes. This.

It's funny, because I had a feeling that would be your response. I can see that in your writing—love that aspect. I think it's more obvious to me in AE than in anything else I've read of yours (yes, I'm a hoarder, too).
I'm in edits right now, and every time I come to a sex scene, I groan. These are always the scenes with the most edits. :-P
Personally, I think there's nothing more satisfying than a well-written scene of erotic intimacy between two characters who have been struggling with their attraction or the obstacles in the way of their attraction.
I love reading such scenes -- and I enjoy writing them (though, yes, they are challenging).
I love reading such scenes -- and I enjoy writing them (though, yes, they are challenging).
Josh wrote: "I love reading such scenes -- and I enjoy writing them (though, yes, they are challenging)."
And we love you for loving to write scenes like that... :)
And we love you for loving to write scenes like that... :)

Honestly, right now I'm wishing you would write a little brochure giving tips. This is making me nutso.
Anne wrote: "Honestly, right now I'm wishing you would write a little brochure giving tips. This is making me nutso.
..."
Welllll, what I am going to write, starting this Wednesday, is a series of articles on writing gay mystery.
Wayne Gunn, author of
was kind enough to write: Lanyon probably knows more about the gay mystery heritage than any other novelist.
So I thought I might as well put that knowledge to use.
..."
Welllll, what I am going to write, starting this Wednesday, is a series of articles on writing gay mystery.
Wayne Gunn, author of

So I thought I might as well put that knowledge to use.
These article will be posted at Not Your Usual Suspects blog over yonder:
http://notyourusualsuspects.blogspot....
http://notyourusualsuspects.blogspot....

..."
Welllll, what I am going to write, starting this Wednesday, is a series ..."
That's so cool!!! And such a fantastic compliment! It makes me happy for you, Josh. :)

..."
Welllll, what I am going to write, starting this Wednesday, is a series ..."
That's beyond cool, Josh! :)

Fab! So that's Wednesday sorted, then -- constantly refreshing the NYUS blog until you appear :-P
Hambel wrote: "Josh wrote: "Welllll, what I am going to write, starting this Wednesday, is a series of articles on writing gay mystery."
Fab! So that's Wednesday sorted, then -- constantly refreshing the NYUS bl..."
:-D
Fab! So that's Wednesday sorted, then -- constantly refreshing the NYUS bl..."
:-D

http://notyourusualsuspects.blogspot...."
Looking forward to reading these.
BTW I turned on the TV last night and the 2nd episode of the 2nd season of Sherlock was half over. Gah! I didn't even know it was aired in Canada yet.
Pender wrote: "Josh wrote: "These article will be posted at Not Your Usual Suspects blog over yonder:
http://notyourusualsuspects.blogspot...."
Looking forward to reading these.
BTW I turned on the TV last n..."
Thank goodness you said "Canada." My heart stopped for a second. I have been waiting and waiting for this.
http://notyourusualsuspects.blogspot...."
Looking forward to reading these.
BTW I turned on the TV last n..."
Thank goodness you said "Canada." My heart stopped for a second. I have been waiting and waiting for this.

Yeah, I specifically mentioned Canada so you wouldn't panic. LOL
It was torture turning the channel, but I hated missing that first hour of the episode. I'll be watching episode three next Sunday, but don't worry, I won't blab and spoil it for you. =D

Kim wrote: "Our daughter is in college in England and her iTunes account is in the UK store. We used it to download all the season 2 episodes of Sherlock and watched them back to back Sunday before last, in be..."
:-D
:-D
This topic has been frozen by the moderator. No new comments can be posted.
Books mentioned in this topic
Alphabears: An ABC Book (other topics)Rag and Bone (other topics)
As Meat Loves Salt (other topics)
The Well of Loneliness (other topics)
The Selfish Gene (other topics)
More...
Authors mentioned in this topic
Julie Smith (other topics)Bernard Cornwell (other topics)
Robin McKinley (other topics)
Tove Jansson (other topics)
Astrid Lindgren (other topics)
More...
..."
Someone else called it "IKEA" sex. LOVED IT! They gave blanket permission to quote the term freely. lol
=D