TWILIGHT HATERS discussion

1375 views
Hate Twilight

Comments Showing 1,601-1,650 of 2,150 (2150 new)    post a comment »

message 1601: by Giggles (new)

Giggles same here lolz


message 1602: by Jim (new)

Jim Carrow | 111 comments Sweet.

But Leave Out all the rest by Linkin Park on the Twilight movie. I thought the world ended. Such an AWESOME song by such an AWESOME band should not be on such a sucky movie


message 1603: by Meghan (new)

Meghan | 29 comments True dat.


message 1604: by Jim (new)

Jim Carrow | 111 comments On a brighter note, New Divide, their new song is on Transformers 2. Starscream will have a bigger role.


message 1605: by Runo (new)

Runo (liferarven) | 17 comments Wow. I have Eclipse on my hand right now, and you know what Im doing? Im writing down everything horrible about the book, so that way all the twi-tards will hopefully wake up and smell the coffee.

Page 1.

'I knew that we would expect no help- at this moment, his family was fighting for their own lives just as surely as he was for ours." Thsi is bella saying that Edwards family won't even ptch in to help save his life. I mean, WHAT KIND OF PARENTS DON'T TRY TO SAVE THIER SON?

In Paragraph 2, its stated that edward showed no hint of doubt that he would destroy his enemies when it comes to him being outnumbered by Victoria's gang, but right after that, bella asked herself if she would live to see who won and who the losers were.
Then she says the odds didn't look so great.

So, jsut on page 1, which only has 2 and half paragraphs, it has 3 loopholes, an example of how un-parent like the cullens are, and bella losing trust of Edward.

I can't believe people don't know what a badly written book is when they see one.


message 1606: by Melyssa (new)

Melyssa | 52 comments But....but.....they have the perfect of all perfect 'happily ever afters'. That's why the books are so perfect and wonderfully written. SMeyer is a literary GENIUS!
*end sarcasm here* :D


message 1607: by Runo (new)

Runo (liferarven) | 17 comments ;D I'm actually color coding the the book to express my hate of it, call it art, then eneter it in the art show next ot all the other Twi-tards' Twilight related pieces.

I hate perfect people. Hasn't SM ever heard that when imperfectioins make the person more perfect, way more romantic than a perfect person??


message 1608: by A.R. (new)

A.R. (arbraun) | 29 comments This is true. It's a cardinal rule of writing. I hear it in critique groups all the time--don't make characters perfect! It takes away the reader's sympathy for them.


message 1609: by Giggles (new)

Giggles i hate perfect people and perfect characters


message 1610: by Sleepydeathrebel (new)

Sleepydeathrebel | 51 comments Hey I have a question. You know how SM's version of vampires sparkle? So Edward sparkles in the sunlight right? Okay so we established that fact, so here's the question. If Edward was for some uncanny and disturbing reason naked in the sunlight, would um, his manhood sparkle too? 0.0


message 1611: by Aaric (new)

Aaric | 260 comments I'm sure it would.
"Glittery Vampires? I prefer anti-social geniuses."


message 1612: by Keara (new)

Keara (kearachristine) Sleepydeathrebel wrote: "Hey I have a question. You know how SM's version of vampires sparkle? So Edward sparkles in the sunlight right? Okay so we established that fact, so here's the question. If Edward was for some unca..."

Interesting thought...


message 1613: by Sleepydeathrebel (new)

Sleepydeathrebel | 51 comments Keara wrote: "Sleepydeathrebel wrote: "Hey I have a question. You know how SM's version of vampires sparkle? So Edward sparkles in the sunlight right? Okay so we established that fact, so here's the question. If..."

XDXDXDXD, this conversation started from a shiny belt @w@



message 1614: by Nicole (new)

Nicole (nicapineda) Sleepydeathrebel wrote: "Hey I have a question. You know how SM's version of vampires sparkle? So Edward sparkles in the sunlight right? Okay so we established that fact, so here's the question. If Edward was for some unca..."

That is just plain wrong on SO many levels.


message 1615: by Giggles (new)

Giggles Sleepydeathrebel wrote: "Keara wrote: "Sleepydeathrebel wrote: "Hey I have a question. You know how SM's version of vampires sparkle? So Edward sparkles in the sunlight right? Okay so we established that fact, so here's th..."

hahahahahahahahahahahahahahahaha


message 1616: by Sleepydeathrebel (new)

Sleepydeathrebel | 51 comments Kit wrote: "Sleepydeathrebel wrote: "Hey I have a question. You know how SM's version of vampires sparkle? So Edward sparkles in the sunlight right? Okay so we established that fact, so here's the question. If..."

Let's hope we'll never see it. But if we do, it's probably going to be a blur of shiny light @_@ -twitch- that sounded even worse.


message 1617: by Keara (new)

Keara (kearachristine) Yeah, it did.

There's a Flair on FaceBook that says "So... Does Every Part Of Edward's Body Sparkle?"


message 1618: by Jim (new)

Jim Carrow | 111 comments Wrong images...


message 1619: by Keara (new)

Keara (kearachristine) Yes. Extremely wrong, yet SO funny!


message 1620: by Rotkiv (new)

Rotkiv | 25 comments i hate this series



message 1621: by Rotkiv (new)

Rotkiv | 25 comments how can anyone with a brain or soul enjoy this terrible jibberish


message 1622: by Rotkiv (new)

Rotkiv | 25 comments i sorry to offend anyone but to even try to listen to someone talk about the plot of this diarhea sandwhich makes my mind go to mush.


message 1623: by Rotkiv (new)

Rotkiv | 25 comments why do people insist on making a big deal from this fink of a book


message 1624: by Rotkiv (new)

Rotkiv | 25 comments its a crapy rip off of any good vampire books



message 1625: by Rotkiv (new)

Rotkiv | 25 comments there is always a forbidden love and someone trying to break it off.


message 1626: by Rotkiv (new)

Rotkiv | 25 comments why cant people realize its a book and you will never meet someone with these powers



message 1627: by Rotkiv (new)

Rotkiv | 25 comments there wont be some handsome man to sweep you off your feet and love you unconditnally.



message 1628: by Rotkiv (new)

Rotkiv | 25 comments For gods sake you're at home reading about fictional characters who wouldn't give a crap about you if they were to exsist.


message 1629: by Keara (new)

Keara (kearachristine) Rotkiv wrote: "...diarhea sandwhich..."

LLOL!

Plus, why did you do a different comment for every sentence?


message 1630: by Aaric (new)

Aaric | 260 comments To put emphasis on each thing. Or because the thoughts were different.


message 1631: by Keara (last edited Jun 08, 2009 03:13PM) (new)

Keara (kearachristine) I guess. But why not just seperate them like this...

One thought.

Another thought.

Yet another thought.

Jeez, so many thoughts.

That's what I do.


message 1632: by Aaric (new)

Aaric | 260 comments Well, everyone is different...


message 1633: by Keara (new)

Keara (kearachristine) Jeez. I get that lecture often enough from my mom.


message 1634: by Rotkiv (new)

Rotkiv | 25 comments im confused do yuo guys switch off on blogs every so often


message 1635: by Rotkiv (new)

Rotkiv | 25 comments oh yeah i think i do that for dramatic effect



message 1636: by Rotkiv (new)

Rotkiv | 25 comments sorry does it bug you


message 1637: by Keara (new)

Keara (kearachristine) Rotkiv wrote: "im confused do yuo guys switch off on blogs every so often"

What blogs? Huh?

I go on and off the site a lot because I just click the links in my EMail to get here. Then I close the window when I'm done commenting (if this doesn't make sense, just ask and I'll *try* to clarify).


message 1638: by Keara (new)

Keara (kearachristine) Rotkiv wrote: "sorry does it bug you"

Nope. I was just asking why you were doing it.


message 1639: by Giggles (new)

Giggles doing what???


message 1640: by Keara (new)

Keara (kearachristine) Using a different comment for every sentence.


message 1641: by Giggles (new)

Giggles ok


message 1642: by Keara (new)

Keara (kearachristine) My mom freaking blocked YouTube! *tears*


message 1643: by Jim (new)

Jim Carrow | 111 comments Nooooooo!!!!!!!! How dare you do such a cruel and unsual act?!


message 1644: by Jim (new)

Jim Carrow | 111 comments you- she

sorry, got my words wrong.


message 1645: by Giggles (new)

Giggles lolz its ok wow i cant believe that why would someone do that??????


message 1646: by Keara (new)

Keara (kearachristine) Block YouTube? Becuase she doesn't trust me.









*whispers* If I were her, I wouldn't trust me, either. If that makes any sense...


message 1647: by Kiara (last edited Jun 18, 2009 02:20PM) (new)

Kiara Rotkiv wrote: "there wont be some handsome man to sweep you off your feet and love you unconditnally.
"


yeah but some girls wished there was, thats why some people hope (*looks guilty*) that there will be a guy out there who will love them unconditionally. thats probaby why ppl love the book so much


message 1648: by [deleted user] (new)

and thats y im never having any reletionships like that! yay! i cant stand the book, and i really cant stand any romance crap outside of POTO


message 1649: by Kiara (new)

Kiara POTO?


message 1650: by [deleted user] (new)

phantom_of_the_opera


back to top