Tips for Self Promotion, Sales, and Advertising discussion
Amazon Tips
>
Is our presence on Amazon COUNTER PRODUCTIVE?
date
newest »


Amazon is essentially a giant computer. Do you think the Amazon staff really has time to read every single book review on the site and then judge who they promote? No they use the same principles as SEO but slightly different. Let's take an example- book A has 10 one sentence reviews all with 5 stars and book B (the better book) has 5 great content reviews with 5 star rankings. Based only off this information which book do you think Amazon will promote? Book A even if the reviews are worse. Amazon is a computer they look at how many reviews you have and their rankings. Amazon picks up on how many times product links are mentioned on their site for your book. It is like a big tally system. If you dont start the hype about your book who will.



In my case, I rarely ever ask anyone to review my books. Even here on GoodReads or in any other venue I try stay away from suggesting that people review my books. It is just something that I don't want to do. If readers feel the book is important enough for them to write a review, fine, but I am very trepid to sort of urge them into it.
Again, that is just my sense of how I want to do business and how I want people to perceive me as an author.

In my case, I rarely ever ask anyone to review..."
I go a little farther in that not only do I not ask for reviews, I don't give away books expecting anything in return, nor do I tag, beg, or play the you do mine and I will do yours game. I simply compile a list of interested readers and sometimes interesting readers. I want to write books that have honest appeal and give people a chance to relax and enjoy a little quiet time. I want honest interest, no hype and a 1000 year progressive increase in the sales of my books. I am not interested in any recognition during my lifetime, I want to write books that will stand the test of time and one day some little boy or girl down my heritage line will pick up a book out of the school library and say, "Wow, my great great grandpa's name is on this book." Simple as that.
Dr M
Am I different? I hope so. But, I honestly enjoy reading all of these comments and appreciate all of you who spend time on these pages.

Every person is different but in my opinion trying to get your book reviews on Amazon can only do more good than harm.


Reviews are only honest if they come naturally, not when they are urged upon you by the author of a book.
Tom, you wrote: Guido, are you saying that if you gave a speech to, say, a local reading group, you wouldn't say something like "if you enjoyed the book, i hope you will write a customer review on amazon!" ?
In your example, where is this reading group meeting? Most reading groups that I know of meet in either bricks and mortar bookstores, indie bookstores, or libraries.
Obviously it would be a terrible discourtesy to the host to implicitly suggest that bookclub members should visit Amazon. One would pretend that they buy all their books wherever they are.
In order to write a review on Amazon, one must have purchased something from Amazon.
In your example, where is this reading group meeting? Most reading groups that I know of meet in either bricks and mortar bookstores, indie bookstores, or libraries.
Obviously it would be a terrible discourtesy to the host to implicitly suggest that bookclub members should visit Amazon. One would pretend that they buy all their books wherever they are.
In order to write a review on Amazon, one must have purchased something from Amazon.

You are the man. That is precisely the way it should be. Reviews should be honest, truthful and promote good work, and I totally agree with your entire comment here. Again, I say as I have said before: to ask for a favorable review and offer the same for something you wouldn't buy yourself, is rather unethical in anyone's book. Good books will sell and this may be the slow way to the top, but hey, what's wrong with being true to yourself and to your readers? There is more to being a good author than selling a lot of bad books just for the income, standing or recognition. There are a lot of wonderful books from this group of people but one of the problems is that they are hard to find among the chaff. I do book reviews for authors, not for money or to trade reviews, but I try to give my honest opinion. The last review I did I gave a glowing report on the storyline, the action, and connectivity of events and characters, but I also added that the base, low standard description of certain events just to attract readers was not only out of character for the book, but cheapened the whole thing. We all get out of life what we put in and generally what we want, I hope you are all doing well.
Dr

Like you, I also review pretty much every book I read. I review it here, on Amazon and on Facebook, because I know how important reviews can be, especially to unestablished authors.
Guido wrote: "I think the majority of people do not even know of GoodReads..."
GoodReads authors could, if they wanted to do so, improve that situation.
http://www.amazon.com/tag/goodreads%2...
And
http://www.amazon.com/tag/goodreads/r...
I do not know it to be true, but it seems to me that humans are naturally inquisitive, and love to eavesdrop on other people's conversations.
I do know it to be true that active discussions in "related" communities on Amazon show up on the front pages of much larger groups.
So, for instance, if Tom were to start an agonizing conversation such as this one (very carefully worded because we know Amazon readers could tune in at any time) on the GoodReads Author community, it would show up on every other community that any of "our" books are also on.
Obviously, it would be morally wrong to lie, but I'm sure it would be possible to give a grand impression of how important GoodReads is etc etc etc
GoodReads authors could, if they wanted to do so, improve that situation.
http://www.amazon.com/tag/goodreads%2...
And
http://www.amazon.com/tag/goodreads/r...
I do not know it to be true, but it seems to me that humans are naturally inquisitive, and love to eavesdrop on other people's conversations.
I do know it to be true that active discussions in "related" communities on Amazon show up on the front pages of much larger groups.
So, for instance, if Tom were to start an agonizing conversation such as this one (very carefully worded because we know Amazon readers could tune in at any time) on the GoodReads Author community, it would show up on every other community that any of "our" books are also on.
Obviously, it would be morally wrong to lie, but I'm sure it would be possible to give a grand impression of how important GoodReads is etc etc etc
I don't know about other authors, but it's not like I'm going doing an interview and as part of it tell my readers to go and review the book on Amazon. That, I agree, would be extremely detrimental.