Stephen King Fans discussion
IT Discussions
>
Problems with "It"

It was also because she herself had a fear of intimacy because her father abused her. You really never understood the severity of the abuse until she started hanging out with the boys and her fathers true jealousy came through the woodwork. It was innuendo-ed through the book in the Bev/dad scenes in the book and in the movie.
Also, the movie still to this day makes me check the toilet before I go to the bathroom...FREAKY!

Me too I HATED washing my hair in the kitchen sink for the longest time and didn't let it dangle in the drain.






I agree with you Lori :D


I always saw this scene as a necessary part of the novel because it is a scene in which, one, Bev calms the group down in what she felt was the only way (so it not only shows her strength in that moment but also her maturity), and two, it symbolizes the loss of innocence of the group.
In a novel that is so much about childhood, I think this is a critical transition period for the characters in the novel.
Now, would I want my daughter to be particpating in a ritual like this? Definitely not - haha. But I'm not an 11 year old that has just faced more evil than I can ever even imagine!


As far as the Bev scene goes... I found it kind of unnecessary. Not offensive, just weird. I would've had the kids make a connection through more mystical means - a spell or something. But maybe that's just me.







I have no problem reading uncomfortable scenes and even when I skip that one, I know it happened and I "GET" the connection that was forged.
Like Monnie, I feel some sexual abuse was happening between Bev's father and Bev, but unlike her that makes me think it would have actually cheapened "the scene" for Bev. Is sex absolutely necessary for men? Is it impossible to bond over something else? Obviously not, since the "gang" had already bonded over so much else. The sex felt gratuitous.

I suspect you are right, Kandice. In every other respect I found the book to be one of King's best.


I once asked an editor friend how to write a really good story. He answered immediately. Take a group of interesting characters, put them in a difficult situation and see what they do.
The losers club in IT are a group of very interesting characters even as kids. The situation of confronting the ultimate evil couldn’t be more difficult. Stephen King when presented with this scenario, and the fact that the small circle had been broken, watched his characters and saw... (view spoiler) Could there be a more powerful resolution to the situation? I don’t think so. I wondered why the publisher allowed him to tell such a provocative story, one that runs right up against some of the strongest moral convictions we have. The answer is because he’s an artist. This isn’t prurient stuff. It’s not suggestive or obscene, it’s seven adolescent kids coming face to face with evil and dealing with it in a ritualistic way that they don’t understand but which resonates with primitive truth. It is shocking yes, maybe hard to take, but not wrong.

Growing up is never easy, and never will be. Taking that one obviously ominous scene out of the context of the whole book is denying the whole process of growing up that we've all experienced and been through, each in our own time, which means denying who we are now.

Absolutely!

That is what it's all about, so I am glad someone agrees with me! Thanks :)

I'm sure there are lots of others who agree with you, Tanja.

I sure hope so!

I thin we all remember that to one degree or another. I still don't see how that justifies the "scene" we are all discussing. Feeling like an outsider, a nothing, a nobody is the basis for the book. The losers banding together is what makes "It" possible, but the scene still feels out of place to me.
I can't say enough that it doesn't ruin the book for me, I just feel it could have been some other bonding experience and meant more to me. Again, that's personal, not universal.

I hear you Kandice, and I think you may be in the majority. As I say it shocked me. Not sure though; not many people weigh in on this so it's hard to say. I have to tell you, I've wracked my brain to think of an alternative. Nothing as powerful comes to mind. But then there is the shock value of the scene adding to its power. Personally, I just think King wanted to write it. I think he falls in love with his characters just as I do with mine. He gets very close to them. I'd also like to know what Tabitha thought about it. Bet she encouraged him to leave it in.

I am altogether sympathetic toward your point of view, Nick. On the other hand ... (view spoiler) I only wish Mr. King could have found another way to be "truthful" to his characters.

You're right.

Nope your not alone I had no problem with it either
Nilofer wrote: "Chris said "I still hold many of my initial feelings about the book, and I don't think i'd ever read it again, but it was still an interesting journey in itself.
Oh, and about that scene with Beve..."

Well, I bet that everyone who has finished the book and sees a thread called "Problems with IT" immediately thinks of that scene. I did.
To add my opinion, IT is probably my favorite SK book, along with the middle books of The Dark Tower. I'm with the ones who wouldn't have the ending any other way. This is one of the few instances where a book has really made me uncomfortable and think about a scene a lot, and I appreciate it. I like the Voice of Gan interpretation.

I understand why some of you are, let's say, concerned about THAT scene. In the times we live in, the age is controversial, not to mention the group aspect. Plus the fact that, perhaps, the book would be fine without it (as some of you adapted by skipping that fragment).
BUT it is there and nothing gonna change that. And good! How many emotions, opinions, endless discussions it brings ! It forces us to think, to talk about it and share our thoughts and doubts. That's something positive about it.
I don't really have problems with the scene. Of course, at the beginning it was like: yyyygh? what the frock?, but after my conclusion was that, first, it was a symbolic act of living the childhood behind and go to the next stage. Second, it was an act of uniting the losers, something that ties them together forever. Also something had to be done to calm down the group at that moment, so Bev stepped out and, well, did it. In a way ,probably, she thought was suitable.
I think someone mentioned that: I also had a feeling of Beverly being abused by her father not only physically, but in a bad way as well. Though I don't think there was anything strait said about that in the story.
Anyway, I absolutely loved the novel. It easy becomes number one of the King books (overall "Rage" is still my favourite, but that's Bachman) for me. Really, really good read.
One more thing (I'm going crazy with writing today :P). The movie, or mini series. I watched it again after finishing the book. I looooove the young losers. The cast was great. As the adults go, I would change everyone.

Apparently it's quoting SK himself!


I thought it was pretty pathetic and awful that she had to prove Pennywise/her dad right about being a "slut-child"

That is exactly how I felt, along with many people I have discussed this book with. I really think King went too far with that scene. Then I had a discussion with Edward Lorn about It a couple days ago...it was on the phone, not here on GR, but he felt strongly about the scene-- when I mentioned my dislike of the scene, he explained that they that scene was there because what they do is meant to destroy their childhood so they can escape the grasp of the monster. i didn't feel like arguing with him about it because of his strong feelings and I guess I at least somewhat understand the reason for that scene, but I still do not like it at all. Of course, it doesn't change my love for King, but I was disappointed in him for a bit. Just went too far--they were 11--too young for a "gang bang"....Bev would have hurt for a long time!

I have just finished reading some of King's earliest work--Night Shift. Many of those stories were pre-Carrie--His earliest published work. Anyway, the story The Mangler mentions a scene about a refrigerator at a dump that is much like the one in It. It may have even been the same one, as King so often likes to put bits and pieces from his older works in his books...that's why I'm reading him over in chronological order...to try to catch all of those thing, though I can be pretty blind. So that refrigerator in It must have gotten to me too, in the middle of that mammoth book, for me to notice it mentioned in the short story. Love those tie-ins in his work!

Yes---I guess the move from childhood into adulthood is really what the scene was about. Pennywise went after childish people. The adults didn't know about him. The change into adulthood was how they managed to escape him....down there in the tunnel, they had to change quickly in order to escape, and I think King really thought that was the only way to make the move quickly.
Oh yea I do. I made the mistake of reading It when my husband was in boot camp, and I was all alone in this creaky old place out in the country. Stupid mistake! LOL