The Mystery, Crime, and Thriller Group discussion
note: This topic has been closed to new comments.
General Chat
>
Currently Reading? Just Finished?
message 1901:
by
T
(new)
Mar 11, 2011 04:11PM

reply
|
flag

But he's also got a chain of restaurants (sandwiches, shakes, salad), at least in the Midwest.

I have a 1948 copy of the book. I read it about 3 years ago and found it interesting. I think of that time period I prefer The 39 Steps.

Not sure if I will start book #3 now (though I really want to), or try some of the other interesting books I downloaded...I'll figure it out tonight sometime...

I also liked The 39 Steps and only remember that I enjoyed The Riddle of the Sands when I read it years ago. But sometimes you liked a book once and then when you read it again, you think "hmmmm, what did I see that I am missing the second time".....hope that doesn't happen.



I've been having that problem a lot lately. Reading books that I loved 30-40 years ago and trying to find out what I liked about them. Some of them I remember reading in one sitting.
I'm kind of having that problem with The 39 Steps - I first read it in college and I remember doing an all-nighter reading it. Now I just kind of laze my way through. I did appreciate that new version they showed on PBS recently - where they actually stuck to the story as opposed to all of the previous filmed versions. Oh, well, I'll finish it (for the 3rd time) one of these days.



I am so glad to hear you saying that too!

I've found that with some books I read in university and tried to read again, and they just didn't do it for me again. I guess tastes change, your individual perceptions change. Of course then there are books I can read and read again and still get the same feelings I had when I read them the first time.. interesting


I often have a problem with "suspension of disbelief". Even though a lot happens in one night in Rough Justice, I never felt as if my patience was being tested.
As a tease, after reading most all of Scottoline, I finally found out how Mary DiNunzio got shot!

"I've found that with some books I read in university and tried to read again, and they just didn't do it for me again. I guess tastes change, your individual perceptions change. Of c..."
Nice to know I am not the only one to have held on to my Wimseys. I have reread them multiple times over the years and they still hold up. Same with To Kill a Mockingbird. Maybe the ones that don’t hold up are the ones I read years ago but haven't thought of in years.
I have reread James Joyce's short story "The Dead" from The Dubliners and I frequently see new things that I hadn't noticed before.

"I've found that with some books I read in university and tried to read again, and they just didn't do it for me again. I guess tastes change, your individual percept..."
To Kill a Mockingbird is a book I can read again and again, as well, it's a movie I can watch again and again.. Beautiful work..

Started Secrets to the Grave (Deeper than the dead #2) by Tami Hoag today - really enjoyed the first book in this series.
Babs wrote: "New to this group. What is flics?"
Jill wrote: "Parisian police are called flics....like we say cops or bobbies"
We also say flicks to mean movies or films, because the images flicker.
ETA: oops... found the message talking about flics... It's like Jill said, Parisian cops.
I have finished Three Bags Full which was okay. Loved the idea (a mystery investigated by a flock of sheep), but the execution didn't thrill me. (I seem to be in the minority, however, because most other people loved it.)
Jill wrote: "Parisian police are called flics....like we say cops or bobbies"
We also say flicks to mean movies or films, because the images flicker.
ETA: oops... found the message talking about flics... It's like Jill said, Parisian cops.
I have finished Three Bags Full which was okay. Loved the idea (a mystery investigated by a flock of sheep), but the execution didn't thrill me. (I seem to be in the minority, however, because most other people loved it.)

The first of which I did not care too much for. Not because it wasn’t good writing. It was, in fact, too good. (view spoiler) I also had a difficult time keeping the cast of characters straight. But that may just be my attention span. When that portion of “the mystery” was solved, I couldn’t figure out the reason to continue. (view spoiler)
Aha, enter what I consider the second book. The second half had a much better flow. The theme produced by the villain was quite clever (view spoiler) , although again my stomach churned.
I give this book 4 out of 5, after all what do we read mystery thrillers for? The writing certainly affected me.
I will read more John Connolly, but I will have to read a couple of cozies in between to recover my health!

She made herself a character in the book, but she assigned some of her signature moves and remarks to other characters, and not to herself. Interesting burlesque background/history and realistic dressing room dialogue. Otherwise pretty light reading.
I can say I read it, and would only recommend it to the likewise curious reader.
If you DO decide to read it, be sure to read the afterward. It suggests persons on which some of the characters are based. Makes the whole thing more interesting.
Then rent the movie Lady of Burlesque with Barbara Stanwyck. What fun.

The first of which I did not care too much for. Not because it wasn’t good writing. It was, in fact, too good. [spoilers removed] I also..."
Connolly is very intense but worth continuing with the rest of the books.


I may have to look for that book. I read Crime Novels : American Noir of the 1950s which included such stories as "Strangers on a Train" and "They Shoot Horses Don't They". Enjoyed it immensely so I am ready for more.

Most of the stories may be similar but well worth reading

"I've found that with some books I read in university and tried to read again, and they just didn't do it for me again. I guess tastes change, your individual percept..."
Jan C wrote: "Marjorie wrote: "Bill writes:
"I've found that with some books I read in university and tried to read again, and they just didn't do it for me again. I guess tastes change, your individual percept..."
Another Dorothy L Sayers fan here. Over the past few weeks I have re-read Strong Poison, Have His Carcase, Gaudy Night and Busman's Honeymoon (which I finished today). I have now moved on to Thrones, Dominations. While I've read the first four multiple times, this is my first excursion into the Dorothy L Sayers / Jill Paton Walsh Wimsey sequels. Not sure how I will feel about them, but I need to keep reading about Peter and Harriet for a little bit longer!!
Kim wrote: "...this is my first excursion into the Dorothy L Sayers / Jill Paton Walsh Wimsey sequels. Not sure how I will feel about them, but I need to keep reading about Peter and Harriet for a little bit longer!! "
Hi Kim... Thrones was a bit dark and I didn't enjoy it as much as A Presumption of Death, which felt like a direct sequel to Busman's Honeymoon.
Hi Kim... Thrones was a bit dark and I didn't enjoy it as much as A Presumption of Death, which felt like a direct sequel to Busman's Honeymoon.

That's interesting. I knew that Thrones existed and I'm not sure why I haven't gotten around to reading before. But I hadn't heard of Presumption of Death (and I understand there's another one as well) until a few days ago. I'm glad you like Presumption of Death. I've been worrying that it might be a bit too fan-fictiony! I will look forward to reading it.

I plan on going into the next in the series to give her another try. It was probably me, and I was in the mood for a book that moved along a little quicker.
Should I try the Will Trent series?
Marjorie wrote: "...even though, as I understand it, it has less actual Sayers material than Thrones, Dominations..."
Really? I would have said the opposite. Interesting.
I'll be reading the third Walsh book, The Attenbury Emeralds in a while (thanks to a kind GoodReader who sent me a copy). I'm really looking forward to it.
Really? I would have said the opposite. Interesting.
I'll be reading the third Walsh book, The Attenbury Emeralds in a while (thanks to a kind GoodReader who sent me a copy). I'm really looking forward to it.


http://centralcaligrrrl.blogspot.com/...


I plan on goin..."
I like the Will Trent books. I tend to think that Karin Slaughter is one of those crime writers who has improved as she has gone along.


Didn't like this Deaver as well as others, into gaming theories.

Bill, that is one of my favorite series! Hope you enjoy.

Bill, that is one of ..."
Oh no, Dorie!! You mean I may get hooked on another series? The missus might frown at that. ;0)

This topic has been frozen by the moderator. No new comments can be posted.
Books mentioned in this topic
Speaking from Among the Bones (other topics)Ice Hunter (other topics)
Harvest (other topics)
Whiskey Sour (other topics)
Bait (other topics)
More...
Authors mentioned in this topic
Alan Bradley (other topics)Chris Grabenstein (other topics)
Adam Fawer (other topics)
Rachel Caine (other topics)
David Wailing (other topics)
More...