Terminalcoffee discussion
note: This topic has been closed to new comments.
Feeling Nostalgic? The archives
>
I pledge allegiance to linguistic obfuscation
date
newest »


The great thing about rituals is that everybody joins in. The anthropologist Anthony Cohen once noted that the members of a church congregation generally had no single belief in common. (He went round the congregation and asked them, one by one.)
In fact, this principle became the basis for the Elizabethan settlement in the Church of England. You could believe what you like – this meant being anything from a Catholic to an Anabaptist – as long as you turned up and didn’t make a fuss. This principle hit hard times during the English Civil War, but it persists to this day. (Actually, it is in difficulties as I write - as somebody said, "the first time as tragedy, the second time as farce"!)
It is therefore not a good idea to have too much clarity in one’s rituals. Clarity tends to exclude people. When people understand what is being said, they may feel they must opt out.


Larry wrote: "Maybe using older language and costume creates the illusion of permanence in a temporal existance."
I like your alternative temporality Larry!
I like your alternative temporality Larry!

Nearly everything I write is twice as long as it should be. I spend almost as much time throwing out words as I spend writing them in the first place. Larry's point (12) has much merit. Shhh!

This topic has been frozen by the moderator. No new comments can be posted.
Grammar people, knock yourself out!