Cosmic Evolution Simplified

[Dov]

28Dec09 Basis For A Theory Of Everything

Hidden Dimensions?
It Is Space-Distance, Not Space-Time
A suggested something that's worth a "work on".
The science establishment would undoubtedly dismsiss it...


28Dec09 Updated "Implications Of E=Total[m(1 + D):] "
http://www.the-scientist.com/communit...


A. Its essential statement

"Extrapolation of the expansion of the universe backwards in time to the early hot dense "Big Bang" phase, using general relativity, yields an infinite density and temperature at a finite time in the past. At age 10^-35 seconds the Universe begins with a cataclysm that generates space and time, as well as all the matter and energy the Universe will ever hold."

E = Energy content of the universe
m = mass content of the universe
D = distance, Total = in all spatial directions, from the point of Big-Bang, of singularity's energy-mass superposition

At D=0, E was = m and both E and m were, together, all the energy and matter the Universe will ever hold. Since the onset of the cataclysm, E remains constant and m diminishes as D increases.
The increase of D is the initial inflation, followed by the ongoing expansion, of what became the galactic clusters.

At 10^-35 seconds, D was already a fraction of a second above zero. This is when gravity starts. This is what started gravity. At this instance starts the energetic space texture, starts the straining of the space texture, and starts the space-texture-memory, gravity, that most probably will eventually overcome expansion and initiate re-impansion back to singularity.


B. Some of its further essential implications beyond Einstein-Hubble and re classical-quantum physics

And again and again : "On The Origin Of Origins"
http://www.the-scientist.com/communit...

1. It promotes commonsensical scientific critical thinking beyond Einstein-Hubble.

The universe is the archetype of quantum within classical physics, which is the fractal oneness of the universe.

Astronomically there are two physics. A classical Newtonian physics behaviour of and between galactic clusters, and a quantum physics behaviour WITHIN the galactic clusters.

The onset of big-bang's inflation, the cataclysmic resolution of the Original Superposition, started gravity, with formation - BY DISPERSION - of galactic clusters that behave as classical Newtonian bodies and continuously reconvert their original pre-inflation masses back to energy, thus fueling the galactic clusters expansion, and with endless quantum-within-classical intertwined evolutions WITHIN the clusters in attempt to delay-resist this reconversion.

2. There is no call, no need, for any dark energy. The energy of the universe is conserved. The mass of the universe is conserved in the form of energy, the energy fueling the clusters expansion. At the next universal singularity, at the next D = 0, there will again be E = m for a small fraction of a second...just wait and see...

Following Newton (1) gravity is decreased when mass is decreased and (2) acceleration of a body is given by dividing the force acting upon it by its mass. By plain common sense the combination of those two 'laws' may explain the accelerating cosmic expansion of galaxy clusters and the laws that drive it, based on the E/ m/ D relationship suggested above..

3. There is no call, no need, for a Higgs Particle.

The resolution of energy-mass superposition is reverted when D = 0. Shockingly sad, but must be soberingly faced rationally.


C. Its implications re the origin and nature of life beyond Darwin, re selection for survival

For Nature, Earth's biosphere is one of the many ways of temporarily constraining an amount of energy within a galaxy within a galactic cluster, for thus avoiding, as long as possible, spending this particularly constrained amount as part of the fuel that maintains the clusters expansion.

Genes are THE Earth's organisms and ALL other organisms are their temporary take-offs.

For Nature genes are genes are genes. None are more or less important than the others. Genes and their take-offs, all Earth organisms, are temporary energy packages and the more of them there are the more enhanced is the biosphere, Earth's life, Earth's temporary storage of constrained energy. This is the origin, the archetype, of selected modes of survival.

The early genes came into being by solar energy and lived a very long period solely on direct solar energy. Metabolic energy, the indirect exploitation of solar energy, evolved at a much later phase in the evolution of Earth's biosphere.


D. Towards nothingness, or impansion?

At infinitely large D, at m = nearly 0, E is still constant due to high D. When mass diminishes to near zero, energy does not diminish. This is rational as since the Big-Bang, since the resolution of E/m superposition, E continues - Newtonwise - to impart energy to m, and - quantumwise - to temporarily survive m. When there is no m, at very high D, there is only E left...

So where is the universe heading? Is it heading towards nothingness, or towards impansion? What might happen when very high D is reached? Will this be the oblivion into nothingness, or will this be the start of impansion back towards a cosmic E/m superposition?

Commonsense rational would expect an impansion. Not that it matters to us. It has no bearing on our present or future life. Rationally it is more convenient to accept the rationality of a cyclic cosmos than of a one-time cosmos. It is easier to accept that at some very large D value
there will come into play the cosmic space texture, the gravity monotheism, the space texture laid and memory-strained since inflation.

It is easier to accept that gravity will eventually overcome the fuel-starved expansion and initiate re-impansion back to singularity. This is easier to accept, even if its origin and nature are still beyond our comprehension.

Dov Henis
(Comments from 22nd century)
Cosmic Evolution Simplified
http://www.the-scientist.com/communit...