UC San Diego Libraries Summer Reading! discussion
Contest Rules
>
Contest / Rules questions
date
newest »

message 1:
by
Dan
(new)
Apr 21, 2008 01:43PM

reply
|
flag

We prefer that you read and review books starting May 1st, but we can’t (and won’t) stop you from submitting a review on May 1st.
Thanks for the question, Colleen.
Marlo Young
Thanks for the question, Colleen.
Marlo Young


I agree that last year graphic novels became all the rage as people tried to up the number of books to compete for the "most read" prizes. There are other prizes to acknowledge great reviews and content.
I do, however, have to note that I've been reading quite a few graphic novels lately, not for the contest (in fact, likely supporting your point, I hadn't even considered using them for the contest, hmmm), and want to say that the content of some of these has as much literary/historical/political value as many things I've read that are more traditional books. Try Fun Home by Alison Bechdel or Persepolis by Marjane Satrapi. I think Persepolis was every bit as good as, if not better than, Reading Lolita in Tehran. Fun Home, with allusions to authors ranging from Camus and Proust to Henry James and James Joyce (actually maybe that isn't so much of a range, but still), is a witty, insightful, literary, and beautifully drawn exploration of Bechdel's childhood, her relationship with her father (who might or might not have killed himself) and her own self-discovery and coming out as a lesbian. No, it's not like reading Winston Churchill's wartime correspondence. But for me, it's much, much better!
Thank you for sharing your comments on graphic novels and the Summer Reading Contest rules. You all raise some very good points.
We will continue to monitor and discuss the inclusion of graphic novels in the Summer Reading Contest to ensure fairness.
We will continue to monitor and discuss the inclusion of graphic novels in the Summer Reading Contest to ensure fairness.

For me personally, I like my summer reading to be more light and fun in comparison to my winter reading. It's probably a throw-back to my college days. This contest has changed my mind a little and I will read some classics, some non-fiction and now, some graphic novels. I'm not in this to win prizes - prizes are the bonus - I'm in this to find new books and enjoy myself.

From a technical, contest rules standpoint: If there is a "no graphic novel" rule because they are relatively quick and easy reads, then that opens up a large can of worms. Should there be a limit on how long a book should be? Right now, for example, every Dostoyevsky book is the same, whether it's 150 page Notes from Underground or 800 page Brothers Karamazov. Or what about difficulty level? A Thomas Pynchon novel is worth the same as a James Patterson, when there is a wide difference in time and effort to read them.
And then there are books of poetry, plays, etc. All which take varying times to read. The contest can't feasibly have an "effort level" rule built in.
If someone wants to bulk up their list by reading quick-to-read books, they will be able to. That's why most of the prizes center on quality of review, I believe.



Hi Claire,
You can get your copy of the book anywhere you like. The only stipulation is that UCSD libraries have to own a copy of the book you're reading.
Rachel