UK Amazon Kindle Forum discussion

405 views
General Chat - anything Goes > The 'Take it Outside' thread This thread will no longer be moderated ***

Comments Showing 4,801-4,850 of 5,982 (5982 new)    post a comment »

message 4801: by B J (new)

B J Burton (bjburton) | 2680 comments It's not supposed to be philanthropic. It was formed at the end of WWII and exists as a lender of last resort for countries about to go bust. It earns interest on the loans and after paying its admin costs the surplus is returned to member countries (who provide the capital) in proportion to funds provided.


message 4802: by David (new)

David Edwards | 417 comments According to Keynes, the International Monetary Fund and the World Bank were given each others' names. Countries that fall into the clutches of the IMF are treated rather like RBS customers passed to the GRG. RBS GRG Whistleblower

The rather sick joke is that the most of the IMF's money goes to the people that the distressed countries owe money to. The IMF then attempts to get paid back by the countries in question.


message 4803: by David (last edited Oct 14, 2016 02:42PM) (new)

David Edwards | 417 comments If you owe the bank £1,000 and you can't pay, you have a problem.

If you owe the bank £1,000,000,000 and can't pay, the bank has a problem.

But the banks escape when the IMF pays them off. The problem is then back with you.


message 4804: by Will (new)

Will Macmillan Jones (willmacmillanjones) | 11324 comments I'll just leave this here


http://www.telegraph.co.uk/business/2...


message 4805: by Jim (new)

Jim | 21809 comments He's only saying what a lot of serious economists have said all along, it's an economic project that was massively compromised because of political imperatives. Countries like Greece and a number of the other southern Med states shouldn't have been allowed to join but stuff was fudged


message 4806: by Jim (new)

Jim | 21809 comments and I'll take pity on you lest you'd begun to feel that you were slipping to the dark side. Here's the Guardian sort of agreeing ;-)

https://www.theguardian.com/business/...


message 4807: by Will (new)

Will Macmillan Jones (willmacmillanjones) | 11324 comments Larry Elliot is always worth reading.


message 4808: by Marc (new)

Marc Nash (sulci) | 4313 comments anyone see the latest Adam Curtis documentary yet? "Hypernormalisation" is on BBC I-Player. Don't expect it to cheer you up any


message 4809: by Lynne (Tigger's Mum) (last edited Oct 17, 2016 11:52PM) (new)

Lynne (Tigger's Mum) | 4643 comments I know company finance is complicated and I may be too stupid to understand but why is Ryanair complaining about his Irish company being affected by Brexit and blaming the pound's losing value for a projected downturn. Surely his company returns are in euros. His aviation fuel etc would be bought in dollars so why he's banging on about the pound isn't clear to me. Makes good headlines though for remainers.


message 4810: by Will (new)

Will Macmillan Jones (willmacmillanjones) | 11324 comments Brexit seems to be used right now as a convenient reason for everything, no doubt the recent rainfall will be factored in soon as because of the referendum?


message 4811: by Jim (new)

Jim | 21809 comments Another interesting article
As the chap said it probably won't be possible for us to negotiate a deal with 27 states any one of which could veto it because they didn't get what they wanted.
I think we've just got to go with hard brexit and then do deals on single issues, such as join residence for each others nationals, access to health services etc

I don't think the EU would be willing to accept a free trade deal with us, unless we came inside their tariff wall and we did no trade deals with anybody else

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/business/2...


message 4812: by R.M.F. (new)

R.M.F. Brown | 2124 comments Short term pain, long term gain seems to be the mantra. Let's hope so.


message 4813: by Will (new)

Will Macmillan Jones (willmacmillanjones) | 11324 comments Worth contemplating, in view of that: if we had stayed in, the chance of the 50% Rebate being renewed must be miniscule.


message 4814: by T4bsF (Call me Flo) (new)

T4bsF (Call me Flo) (time4bedsaidflorence) We've suffered worse without any particular thing to blame. I can remember a time in the mid 70's when our mortgage interest rate was over 16% - we coped then with 2 young children to feed & clothe and I was only working part-time then.............. and no, we didn't have well paid jobs! My husband was working in the local paper mills and I was just starting my Nurse training.


message 4815: by Jim (new)

Jim | 21809 comments yep we hit 22% on our business overdraft!


Lynne (Tigger's Mum) | 4643 comments That was an awful time. Our mortgage went up by 50%. I wasn't working as our daughter was small. There was no maternity leave provision. The co-op nearby had ticket upon ticket with the price increases on food. No bar codes then. Husband applied for a job in Zambia. We had much too much month left at the end of his salary.


message 4817: by Will (new)

Will Macmillan Jones (willmacmillanjones) | 11324 comments Meanwhile the EU trade deal with Canada appears to be held up (again) awaiting the agreement of the Regional Assembly of Wallonia, population the same size as Cardiff.

I conclude that meaningful negotiations with the EU are impossible.


message 4818: by Patti (baconater) (new)

Patti (baconater) (goldengreene) | 56525 comments Nevermind. All we'd send over is beaver tails and poutine.


message 4819: by Marc (last edited Oct 18, 2016 01:30PM) (new)

Marc Nash (sulci) | 4313 comments Eu is rubbish.... blah blah... new trade deals impossible... this may be true but you wait and see what trade deals we secure outside of it


message 4820: by David (new)

David Manuel | 1112 comments Patti (baconater) wrote: "Nevermind. All we'd send over is beaver tails and poutine."

How ya gonna keep 'em eatin' chili cheese fries with gravy, after they've had poutine?


Lynne (Tigger's Mum) | 4643 comments There's trouble at t'moulin. The demonstration by the French police is really gaining ground. The 500 or so who marched last week in support of their collègues who were deliberately firebombed and burnt last week at Evry have been sanctioned and the head of the police has told them that the igpn will be investigating them. He was jeered on leaving the meeting and there's an even larger demo in Paris tonight with other regions supporting them. Its bad when the government is not supporting the upholders of the law.


message 4822: by Jim (new)

Jim | 21809 comments The French government over the years has always had a strange relationship with 'the servants of the state'

Isn't there a Yes Primeminister quote where a French government minister says that the government never knows what the secret service are doing?


message 4823: by Lynne (Tigger's Mum) (last edited Oct 20, 2016 12:43AM) (new)

Lynne (Tigger's Mum) | 4643 comments This particular French government doesn't seem to know what anything is doing. There's a growing groundswell that some sections of the community are literally getting away with murder while commenting or protesting legitimately is not only punished but with relish. I followed the General Piquemal story with interest. He dared to join a protest march organised by various groups including Pegida but he wasn't of that group, about the situation at Calais and the videos and treatment of the old man who did nothing more than attend a march was shocking. He was co-operating with the dispersal order but because he was a very respected retired army general he was dragged along the floor then kept in detention in an alleged cold bare hangar type place for 72 hours. He was hospitalised afterwards. This was to teach decent people a lesson to keep their traps shut, purely and simply. Look what we can do to you if you dare oppose us. He has now been stripped of all rank and presumably his pension. The march last night of ordinary police wasn't reported at all in some newspapers. There are a couple of divisions the BAC and IGPN who enforce the governments wishes with the compliance of the media who censor anything not favourable to ministers. It's fear for livelihoods and censorship that is keeping the people down but it's really bubbling in parts. The dismantling of the Jungle and distributing thousands of people to reception centres where they don't want to go to and they aren't wanted is appalling. Sending 80 adult men of totally different ethnic origin to a mountain village in haute Provence, with an ageing population of 400 is sensible or considered? Yes it's considered - who voted against the government - those villages who are being expected to assimilate and welcome the influx. Nuff said.


message 4824: by Jim (new)

Jim | 21809 comments Always intrigued me that the people in the Jungle want to come to the UK and don't want to be in France or the rest of the EU


message 4825: by Will (new)

Will Macmillan Jones (willmacmillanjones) | 11324 comments I recall reading in a Bernard Cornwell Sharpe novel a character saying:

The French believe that they are blessed by God, and cursed with Paris.

It sounded then like something he had heard whilst researching.


Lynne (Tigger's Mum) | 4643 comments I think that's very appropriate Will. It actually puzzles me why they are determined to get here. It's almost as if they've been brainwashed :o)


message 4827: by David (new)

David Edwards | 417 comments The whole world knows that the streets of London are paved with gold.

Joking apart, though, London is a pretty amazing place. I doubt its equal exists anywhere else in the world; if it does, I've never found it.


message 4828: by Jim (new)

Jim | 21809 comments I always felt the finest sight in London was the Platforms at Euston as you pulled out heading north
I don't mind London but I'd dislike spending more than one night there :-)


message 4829: by T4bsF (Call me Flo) (new)

T4bsF (Call me Flo) (time4bedsaidflorence) David wrote: "The whole world knows that the streets of London are paved with gold.

Joking apart, though, London is a pretty amazing place. I doubt its equal exists anywhere else in the world; if it does, I've ..."


I have. A little suburb in Wales - called Cardiff!!! Fantastic place to live!!


message 4830: by David (new)

David Edwards | 417 comments I wouldn't knock Cardiff, it has a nice 'minor European provincial capital' vibe, but it's not in the same league as London. But the North isn't in the same epoch.


message 4831: by T4bsF (Call me Flo) (new)

T4bsF (Call me Flo) (time4bedsaidflorence) Quite correct David - it's not in the same league - it's in the Premiership!!! London is only about Div. 2 as far as I'm concerned ;-)


message 4832: by Patti (baconater) (new)

Patti (baconater) (goldengreene) | 56525 comments Gotta say I'd take living in Cardiff over London any day.
Actually, London is pretty far down on my list of big cities I'd be willing to live in.


message 4833: by Will (new)

Will Macmillan Jones (willmacmillanjones) | 11324 comments My girlfriend's daughter lives in London. I cannot understand anyone spending more than 24 hours there. It would drive me mad. They all seem either mad, bad, or simply terrified.


Lynne (Tigger's Mum) | 4643 comments I haven't set foot in London since the Hyde park bombings. What should have been a lovely day out turned into a nightmare.


message 4835: by Michael (new)

Michael Cargill (michaelcargill) | 2992 comments London is fantastic, but we need to get rid of eyesores like the Palace of Westminster.


Lynne (Tigger's Mum) | 4643 comments Rentokil.


message 4837: by ✿Claire✿ (new)

✿Claire✿ (clairelm) | 2602 comments passed :)


message 4838: by ✿Claire✿ (new)

✿Claire✿ (clairelm) | 2602 comments Oops! That was completely the wrong thread! Sorry!!


message 4839: by Jim (new)

Jim | 21809 comments never mind, congratulations anyway Claire :-)


Lynne (Tigger's Mum) | 4643 comments Well done Claire!


message 4841: by Marc (new)

Marc Nash (sulci) | 4313 comments it's okay, London for the Londoners I say!

Let us have our city-state status and we can set the rest of you lot adrift, I mean afloat. Bon voyage! :-)


message 4842: by Jim (new)

Jim | 21809 comments Sort of related actually, just going through the consultation document for the reform of health services in the northern half of Cumbria.
They recognise their improvements will add over 40 minutes to the length of time it takes a woman in the rural bits of Cumbria to get to a maternity ward :-(


message 4843: by Will (new)

Will Macmillan Jones (willmacmillanjones) | 11324 comments London is welcome to go, Marc. Just pay the res of us back the tax monies that went into Crossrail... ;)


message 4844: by Marc (new)

Marc Nash (sulci) | 4313 comments pay us all the revenues we use to stop other regions sinking into the mire :-)


message 4846: by Jim (new)

Jim | 21809 comments I think this is one area where we find the roots of Brexit to be honest. London does contribute more per head than other regions, but there again, it gets vastly more of the investment than other regions. It's something people have realised long ago.
But just as the North West's investment figures are massively distorted by Sellafield and decommissioning, so London's are by the influence of 'The City'

There is a clash of arguments, on one hand it makes sense to invest in success, where things are going well, invest to make them go better.
But on the other hand if other regions had had the same level of investment as London had, then they might well have boomed in much the same way.
Certainly there is a strong argument for switching a proportion of investment away from London. The first is the principle of picking the low hanging fruit. Because the other areas have been so under-invested, you'll get more result for the money you spend.
The second is the more long term, if global warming is a real deal, in the life time of some of the people reading this post, the sea levels will rise and the Thames will flow through the tunnels of the underground and life in large parts of London may become impossible. For some areas, investing in evacuation drills and housing in areas on higher ground might make more sense than continuing to throw money into the areas that will be under water.


message 4847: by R.M.F. (new)

R.M.F. Brown | 2124 comments Marc wrote: "pay us all the revenues we use to stop other regions sinking into the mire :-)"

Scotland calling: we'd like our North Sea Oil money back :P


message 4848: by R.M.F. (new)

R.M.F. Brown | 2124 comments Jim wrote: "I think this is one area where we find the roots of Brexit to be honest. London does contribute more per head than other regions, but there again, it gets vastly more of the investment than other r..."

The West Midlands was the heartbeat of the Industrial revolution - still a lot ox expertise there, and some good investment could see them take off again.


message 4849: by Jim (new)

Jim | 21809 comments It's an interesting problem of maths and compound interest but if you work out the debt Scotland had when it joined the UK and we took on, the oil money, minus our investment capital, just about pays if off :-)


message 4850: by Marc (last edited Oct 21, 2016 10:49AM) (new)

Marc Nash (sulci) | 4313 comments Will & Jim, yes I absolutely agree parts of the rest of the country wanted to give London (and Westminster elites) a kicking and informed their choice to vote Brexit. They may well get their wish by dragging London down towards their level if The City of London loses its financial primacy between the Far East & New York time zones and it goes instead to Frankfurt or Paris. Bang goes 10% of HMRC tax revenue. Then we can all wallow in then mire together, united in our penurious isolation.

BTW for what it's worth, Arts Council England has a stated aim to move funding away from London and out to other areas of the country. Enjoy your performance artists stuffing yams up their nether regions on the public pound up there in Cockermouth and Market Deeping. We'll miss 'em


back to top