UK Amazon Kindle Forum discussion
General Chat - anything Goes
>
The 'Take it Outside' thread This thread will no longer be moderated ***
message 5401:
by
Marc
(new)
Apr 18, 2017 11:30AM

reply
|
flag


He's been going round interviewing people about BREXIT. And suddenly discovered what most of us have known for a very long time. That whilst we might hold differing views, only a very small number of us actually froth at the mouth and scream abuse at those holding the opposite view. The majority just shrug and order another pint, or some more chips.


And yet, people still vote for these corrupt and incompetent bastards...
I do wonder about the British people sometimes...



After all politicians who were shown to have taken the mickey with their expenses still ended up being re-elected
Thanks to the fact that all parties keep slagging each other off, all parties now start from a low base of expectation

Interestingly to them the expenses scandal was far worse, and far more dangerous to democracy than anything about electoral expenses

Because a battle bus rolling into town and dropping off activists and campaign material is in no f*****g way influencing a local vote!
And now I'm hearing that at press conferences, our fawning media gives May questions in advance and May can veto the questions she doesn't like...
This country is f*****g corrupt beyond repair.
Banana republic of Britain...


https://www.channel4.com/news/by/mich...
Basically the parties and going to have to sit down and decide exactly what is and is not local and national

I'd vote for Brexit tomorrow, I have no regrets on that front, but Brexit isn't the problem. The problem is a corrupt and incompetent Conservative government.

https://www.channel4.com/news/by/mich...
Basically the parties and goi..."
Since when was ignorance of the law a valid excuse in this nation?
Not having a go at you Jim, but the next honours list should make for interesting reading.

Interestingly to them the expenses scandal was far worse, and far more dangerous to democracy than anything about..."
Oh so true - in comparison. I lived in central Africa for some years and they didn't even bother to keep their corruption covert and when they did try cover-ups they were almost comical.
I hate corruption for itself and also for what it does to everyone, both the corrupters and the corruptees! Or should that be those corrupted upon? Or...

. ..."
when Ken Dodd was taken to court by the inland revenue and got off because the regulations were so complicated the judge couldn't understand them.
As far as I can tell in this case it wasn't that the expenses were hidden, they were declared, but in the wrong heading.
According to the article, none of the other political parties had kicked off about it, probably because they know they'll almost certainly have made similar mistakes.
Too much micromanagement producing impossible regulations. We've seen it in agriculture where the RPA has tried to take people to court and the court has said that the person may have broken the regulation but the regulation in itself is either incomprehensible, or the person had believed they were complying and it was not an unreasonable belief


That was the strange thing about the referendum & its aftermath, both sides discover they're in bed with some very strange allies

It may be some consolation to you that it seems to be down as a Plaid hold
http://www.electoralcalculus.co.uk/cg...
(interesting site by the way even if you disagree with it :-) )


Marc, no. He represents UKIP. I'm of the Dennis Skinner persuasion, that Brexit has nothing to do with immigration and everything to do with anti authoritarianism and anti Neo Lib economics.
There was an interesting piece in the Guardian the other day arguing that the Libdems should be really targetting those like me as their party used to believe in more democracy and less Government control.
But I definetly take your point that the split on the question has gone down some very odd lines indeed.

If you're anti-neo Lib economics, Brexit has unleashed an admittedly unforeseeable chain of events that will only entrench such economics further.


As to neo lib economics being entrenched, this GE was entirely unforseen and i don't think Brexit has anything really to do with it.
I think the poor French are about to get a solid dose of the Neo Libs too, with erosion of workers rights and more globalisation descending upon them: their car factories are being relocated to Romania or Poland, I believe?

This election is nothing to do with Brexit unity, it's going to deliver May a massive majority with which to dismantle the Welfare State, NHS & reintroduce selective education. All against the NeoLib buzzword of austerity, reduce the debt, plus our own impoverished position in the global trading market, worst case scenario, we lose the City Of London's primacy (strange bedfellow, me backing the City of London). Do you think in a post-Brexit Britain, our workers' rights are going to improve?
Ultimate scenario, the country that will be worst hit by Brexit - The British Virgin Islands, as we repatriate all the tax haven institutions and bring them home as our sole earner, laundering the money of Russian oligarchs rather than just letting them buy up our mansions.

the site has an awful lot of fascinating info. I don't know enough to data check it

Why would anyone buy it???

The trough must be bigger at Westminster than at Cardiff. He gives me the creeps.

The trough must be bigger at Westminster than at Cardiff. He gives me the cr..."
Then there's his wife...

Why indeed?

Corbyn's Labour Party on course for a bigger share of the vote than under Milliband"
and less seats I would wager...


It's a strange day when a non-Tory Tory like May, is hailed as the bright new dawn of Conservative Britain. Another 5 years of these corrupt and incompetent bastards.

We will retain the first past the post system of voting for parliamentary elections and extend this system to police and crime commissioner and mayoral elections. We will retain the current franchise to vote in parliamentary elections at eighteen. We will repeal the Fixed-term Parliaments Act.

We will retain the first past the post system of voting for parliamentary elections and ex..."
By definition as these are things already in place they can hardly be said to establish a tyranny.
Actually it wouldn't technically be a tyranny as a tyrant by definition is one who has usurped legitimate sovereignty. If these things were wrong then the sovereignty usurped wasn't legitimate and if they were right then it isn't usurpation :-)

I'm sure that eventually, Labour will conjure up Blair 2.0 from somewhere, somebody that won't spook Middle England, and will promise to keep bombing the hell out of the Middle East, whilst paying lip service to the Labour Old guard with a promise for free sweets for pensioners or something.
Elections will be won, and all will be deemed well in Labour again.

Devolution and the rise of Scottish nationalism meant that Labour suffered the loss of more seats than the tories. Indeed it seems that the tories are now growing in Scotland as the opposition to the SNP, who knows.
I think that labour is now involved in a fight with the libdems over who are the 'other' party. Who will form the government instead of the tories, and who will lead the opposition when the tories win.
Personally I could see circumstances where labour could shrink or split and the libdems grow, taking over a lot of English labour voters and even MPs.
So we'd still have a two party system, with minor parties winning in local areas. I'd guess that in reality the two parties would still have the same policies then as they do now. It'll just be the names have changed slightly

the Metropolitan elite in the big cities, especially London (40+ seats) and the Northern urban areas which you might say is more traditionally working class in outlook. The North think London gets all the treats on offer and many voters took the opportunity of giving London a kicking in the Brexit vote. I can't see how these two wings can ever have shared ground and so no Labour leader can unite them, or his/her party
Books mentioned in this topic
The Beiderbecke Affair (other topics)The Grain Market in the Roman Empire: A Social, Political and Economic Study (other topics)
The Peasants Are Revolting (other topics)
How to Lie with Statistics (other topics)
That Old Ace in the Hole (other topics)
More...