UK Amazon Kindle Forum discussion
General Chat - anything Goes
>
The 'Take it Outside' thread This thread will no longer be moderated ***

I'm no May fan - quite the reve..."
Because it doesn't fit with the narrative of 'evil' Tories and 'good' EU, and I say that as somebody who despises the Conservative party.


She's not my leader.

Brexit is not a problem for me, the problem is the Conservative party.
It's pretty clear what the Tories vision for Britain is:
If it's not nailed down, sell it off to any passing Sheikh or China, slash taxes, trade unions and other workers rights out the window, and generally continue the shambolic economic policies of the last 30 years, as though nothing has happened...
The world's biggest tax haven is not my idea of a bright future.
And as for our farmers, I feel sorry for any farmer having to deal with Andrea Leadsom. I'm surprised she hasn't told British farmers to start digging for victory.

She's not my leader"
She is the leader of the SNP who believe in Scottish Independence which you subscribe to as an ideal. Ergo she is your leader

The Tories are pandering to the anti-immigration crowd to ensure they get re-elected in 2020.

by that definition, anybody on the left in rest of the UK has Corbyn as their leader :-)

by that definition, anybody on the left in rest of t..."
That works for me!

What I find most depressing about Theresa May's speech is the delusional notion that we can have more trade and less immigration. Look at the statistics for the year to June 2016. 175,000 non-EU non-Commonwealth immigrants; more than half the net immigrant total of 339,000. How can anyone imagine this number will fall if we really were to do more trade with the rest of the world? The EU's negotiators will not be fooled.


I'm not a member of the SNP and there's more to Scottish independence than the SNP. The Green party supports it as well.

The Tories are pandering to the anti-immigration crowd to ensure they get re-elected in 2020."
To be fair, with Corbyn in charge of Labour, the Tories could push for a repeal of the 1830s corn laws and still romp to victory.

I'm not a member of the SNP and there's more to Scottish independence than the SNP. The Green party supports it as well. ..."
you don't vote Green...

Hear, hear. And it's boorish behavior everywhere.

The counter epithet 'Remoaner' is nothing like as derogatory. It conjures up echoes against being a 'Moaning Minnie', no one could be offended by such a mild admonition. One also associates the image of a child with a thumb pressed to the tip of their nose and the other four fingers extended to the vertical and then wiggling as the child rejoinders "Yah boo sucks!" Note, not 'suck it up' as the Americans might express it. Nor 'grow a pair'.
But this is illustrative of how the original poster has chosen the wrong line of attack on the disparaging term "Brexitard". For the suffix '-tard' is an American import. Though we too possess the word 'retard', to split it up and repurpose the suffix is a purely American invention. We here in the UK should eschew any 'Americani(z)sation' of the Lingua Franca we have bestowed upon the world. We really need to establish an English version of the French 'L'Academie Francaise' (which one might acknowledge as France's only worthwhile contribution to civilisation, save that it is dedicated to preserving all things French).
English words for English derogation! No Norman French derivations. No Latin, no Ancient Greek (take heed medical professions). No Northern vernacular words conferred under the yoke of Danelaw. Words imported from former British colonies will be considered on a case by case basis, with the exception of Jamaican slang which will not be admitted under any circumstance.

Since it's formed by analogy with Communard, it is perhaps a trifle ironic, but insulting? I think you're being over-sensitive.

Since it's formed by analogy with Communard, it is perhaps a trifle ironic, but insulting? I think you're being over-sensitive."
never fall into the delusion that others care what you think.
Actually I'm quite proud to say that I'm liberal, "willing to respect or accept behaviour or opinions different from one's own; open to new ideas."
You can tell by the spelling it's not an American concept, and looking round, shared by very few to be honest

Definition of liberal
1
a : of, relating to, or based on the liberal arts
b archaic : of or befitting a man of free birth
2
a : marked by generosity : openhanded
b : given or provided in a generous and openhanded way
c : ample, full
3
obsolete : lacking moral restraint : licentious
4
: not literal or strict : loose
5
: broad-minded; especially : not bound by authoritarianism, orthodoxy, or traditional forms
6
a : of, favoring, or based upon the principles of liberalism
b capitalized : of or constituting a political party advocating or associated with the principles of political liberalism; especially : of or constituting a political party in the United Kingdom associated with ideals of individual especially economic freedom, greater individual participation in government, and constitutional, political, and administrative reforms designed to secure these objectives
liberallyplay \ˈli-b(ə-)rə-lē\ adverb
liberalness noun



In that case, would you please start posting in Welsh?
Blasted Sais..... ;-)

That those who voted leave are either racist, too stupid/ ill educated or old to be allowed to vote, or indeed all three.
And that many, many people are only tolerant of views that reflect their own.

That those who voted leave are either racist..."
well that's algorithms and capitalism's need to push more commodities for you and now even ideas are tradable commodities it seems

To you really, Marc. All that talk about the 'johnny come lately' English...

(Sorry, I've been deciding which piece of Shakespeare to rip off for a new novel)


The landlady of the pub was an English speaker. A man came in asking after a particularly obnoxious local character, Dan Caled-Ar. So she shouted out, "Is Mr. Caledar in?"
BTW, the suffix in Brexitard is -ard, not -tard. A propensity to address imagined (or real!) personal slights rather than substantive points is characteristic of spousal arguments.

Are you bored and trying to incite another round of insults and name-calling?

I'm British, we do litotes rather well

BTW, the suffix in Brexitard is -ard, not -tard. A propensity to address imagined (or real!) personal slights rather than substantive points is characteristic of spousal arguments. "
it was -tard for satirical purposes.
I am a Remainer (not a Remoaner).
The clue was supposed to be in the final paragraph beginner 'English words for English derogation!'...

1. He gets totally mired in sleaze, and has no time to end the world
2. In an effort to leave a legacy he devotes himself entirely to building things, and has no time to end the world
3. He gets bored, and can't be bothered to end the world.
I'm hoping for 2.


The problem is I'm old enough to have seen American presidents who were not nice people, and also American presidents who were monstered by the Democrats.


Expect more radical alterations to the Constitution than have happened within living memory, starting with the First Amendment as he goes after his critics in the media (& Hollywood) and clamps down of the freedom oef expression.

Greater still are the numbers who didn't bother to vote for either candidate, and who can blame them? Not I.
Here in the UK, I was reading that we as a nation have 'lost' 9 million voters since the 1992 GE.
I don't blame them either.

That those who voted leave are ..."
What a load of student politics mixed in with pseudo Marxist Trotskyist, neo liberal, globalization, Derby County supporting claptrap!
:)
PS. I spelt globalization with a Z, so stick that up your campaign to preserve the purity of the British English over American English :P
For those who don't know, Marc is always taking the mickey out of me on the sports thread. This is payback :)

A term used about the press here. Normally when somebody is accused of something or arrested for something and the press move in, crawl all over their past, and trash them. There have been cases where it's been pointed out that it may not be possible to get a jury who haven't already had their minds made up for them.
Then the person, somewhat embarrassingly, proves to be innocent
One example of this process is this nurse http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/uknew...
What the article doesn't give you is the sort of things that were said before the trial
Here's one http://www.dailystar.co.uk/news/lates... 'Hero nurse nabs Angel of Death.'
The thing about monstering is that the person who is monstered need not necessarily be a pleasant person, indeed in some cases they were probably unpleasant people, but they weren't actually guilty
Books mentioned in this topic
The Beiderbecke Affair (other topics)The Grain Market in the Roman Empire: A Social, Political and Economic Study (other topics)
The Peasants Are Revolting (other topics)
How to Lie with Statistics (other topics)
That Old Ace in the Hole (other topics)
More...
I'm no May fan - quite the reverse - but fail to understand why she is receiving flak over this.