SciFi and Fantasy Book Club discussion
note: This topic has been closed to new comments.
Group Reads Discussions 2009
>
The Handmaid's Tale - Reading in Progress First Half - Spoilers
date
newest »

message 1:
by
Mawgojzeta
(last edited Nov 03, 2009 11:38AM)
(new)
Nov 03, 2009 09:30AM

reply
|
flag


Thanks for chiming in, Brenda!
I looked again, but I don't see a Part I/Part II type breakdown. The book has 15 sections, labelled by Roman numerals, I - XV. The sections alternate, so every other title is "Night", except for one titled "Nap". Each section has one or more chapters, numbered 1 - 46. If anyone sees another separation point, let me know!

Remember this novel was first published in 1985. I think that the character of Serena Joy is based on (inspired by?) Tammy Faye Bakker (see: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tammy_Fa...). The descriptions certainly match, and Tammy Faye and her husband had a media boomlet going on in the early 1980s.


I believe the three tries is because though they won't admit a man may be infertile, they all know it's possible. And also, since she has no control over the timing, the "ceremony" might not take place at her fertile time of the month. And, even two fertile people aren't always able to conceive for whatever reason.


Yes that was my take as well. Perv all the way.
Sarah wrote: "Plus it doesn't really sound like the men in town have many options. Eww. Did I just say that?"
I couldn't help but notice the constant undercurrent of sexual repression throughout this whole section, which I think is obviously a dominant theme here.
My original impression leading in to this chapter had been that men were all chauvinistic pigs, controlling and dominating the women. But as the chapter ends with the whole Scrabble game, I am beginning to wonder about this. The men seem in many ways to be as controlled and scared as the women. How much are they too being caught up and messed with by this screwed up society?

Which makes me wonder why they've separated everything so rigidly. Everybody is completely cut off from any kind of intimacy with each other. Even friendship is not allowed.
Actually the interaction she had with the border guards made me think of how terribly lonely the men must be. He just wanted to look at the face of a beautiful woman.
Is there anyone who would choose to be a Handmaid? There's some more info coming about their lot, but as the book stands, would anyone choose that? I would rather be a Martha.



Steve said, "I guess I'm just hard like boiled leather. I feel the oppression in the book, and it makes me think of more oppressive societies that parallel this fictional setting, yet all I can think is 'why would people put up with this?'
On about page 70 or so, waiting for a shoe to drop, then the other shoe."
Sarah said, "I do wonder about that. This society is three years old, or her party in it at least. I can understand cooperating rather than getting burned at the stake or something, but I don't get this."
What about hung from a hook? Though I don't know what happens to the women yet at page 70 where I am; we've just seen the Men Salvaging.
Cults are powerful, and if I were trapped in one against my will, I would not want to f*ck with them unless I had a clear escape plan. I'm not sure what the odds are of having a cult be the predominant culture of an entire country, though. Or maybe she is making the observation that human socialization and cults share common systems?
Edited: Or that what is "usual" to us, is a "cult" to someone else, and vice versa...

The Salvaging is pretty awful.





About the 3 years that this has been going on. It does look like she and her daughter were captured three years ago, but they were making a run for it so the society must have been at least partially established.
Was I just confused or did she and Luke get a divorce at one point and he remarried, but then they were trying to leave together. What was up with that?


And this book, with the constant flashbacks, sure makes this hard. I am for this reason trying to avoid discussing anything concrete until I finish.

Yup. I too have been taking this one in small increments to "savor" it.....or maybe to avoid triggering a bout of depression.
And to compound the problem, I am also listening to Still Alice on audio-book, another cheerful and uplifting experience.

:)
Wow, that looks really good. And harrowing, of course.

Yes, I just added this quote from the book: "I want to be held and told my name. I want to be valued, in ways that I am not; I want to be more than valuable."
I've heard the idea before that putting women on a pedestal, worshiping them, is not the same as respecting them. I've even agreed with it and used it in arguments. But I don't think I really "got it" before now. By the time we get to this quote, we have such a clear picture of (a) how valuable her role in this society is, how so many allowances and rituals are set up just for women in her position, and (b) how everyone just treats her like a welcome mat, or a pariah, or an untouchable, or a tool, or a source of resentment. She is so valuable, but her value is as a womb, as a vessel. As a valuable urn that you keep up on a shelf, and only take down daily for dusting.
Lonely is a good description. And alienated, and objectified. The essential object. Conversations may happen nearby you on your shelf, but you are never spoken to, almost never even noticed.
I wonder if this is the same loneliness her mother talked about: "I was so lonely, she'd say. You have no idea how lonely I was. And I had friends, I was a lucky one, but I was lonely anyway." It seems like Ms. Atwood is taking the "Othering" of women to its natural extreme. What does it say about the less obvious, less harsh versions still at work in our society? Are more muted versions of loneliness and depression the universal side effect of being seen as Other? It seems, in some strange way, to be loneliness that is driving the Commander to reach out to Offred for some sort of peer-like relationship. Even he, it seems, cannot abide with women only as things. It's a powerful idea, and I'm glad to finally be "getting" it. For this idea alone I think the book is worth reading.

I don't know why they're so adamant on retaining this whole system and not dissolve such oppressive society and be free.

About the 3 years that this has been going on. It does look like she and her daughter were captured three years ago, but they were ma...
Was I just confused or did she and Luke get a divorce at one point and he remarried, but then they were trying to leave together. What was up with that? "
My read of it: Luke was married to somebody else when she met him; he divorced his wife and married her. After the coup, and women's rights were repealed, her relationship with Luke changed from one of equals to one of her dependent on him; and she wasn't sure it would survive the change in status. Of course, they never got the chance to find out if it would.
This topic has been frozen by the moderator. No new comments can be posted.
Books mentioned in this topic
Still Alice (other topics)The Handmaid’s Tale (other topics)