To Boldly Go ... Split Infinitives and All discussion
Business Basics
>
The differences between editor, copyeditor, and proofreader?
date
newest »

As a freelancer, it happened to me more often than not. I would be asked to copyedit a book, be it a statistical manual, a historical dictionary, a writing textbook, and yet what the publisher really wanted was a substantive edit or even developmental editing. It happened on proofreading jobs as well. I would get to proofreading and discover errors -- or at least consistency issues -- that seemed as if they should have been fixed by the copyeditor or at least queried.
Queries are my friend!
It happens to me less in my full-time manuscript editor position, as far as expectations of being asked for one level when what was meant was much "heavier." That's because I have a defined position.
A minimalist short-version answer, for me, when I hear the words:
editing: more extensive revision (often rewriting), suggestions for adding more text/explanations or removing text, line by line text restructuring and moving of information around if needed (if needed), clarifying anything confusing.
copyediting: grammar, word misuse, typos, structure (formatting: headings, table/figure placement, and the like), syntax, style guide consistency, author- or editor-querying at any point if there are problems -- you go in with an eye toward these.
proofreading (a very important, shouldn't-be-forgotten stage): ensuring no new errors were introduced after the copyediting/typesetting stages; checking for missed spelling issues, spacing, use of correct font.
The editing category, of course, can even be broken into acquisitions, developmental, substantive, technical . . . there are more breakdowns.
Thoughts?
Queries are my friend!
It happens to me less in my full-time manuscript editor position, as far as expectations of being asked for one level when what was meant was much "heavier." That's because I have a defined position.
A minimalist short-version answer, for me, when I hear the words:
editing: more extensive revision (often rewriting), suggestions for adding more text/explanations or removing text, line by line text restructuring and moving of information around if needed (if needed), clarifying anything confusing.
copyediting: grammar, word misuse, typos, structure (formatting: headings, table/figure placement, and the like), syntax, style guide consistency, author- or editor-querying at any point if there are problems -- you go in with an eye toward these.
proofreading (a very important, shouldn't-be-forgotten stage): ensuring no new errors were introduced after the copyediting/typesetting stages; checking for missed spelling issues, spacing, use of correct font.
The editing category, of course, can even be broken into acquisitions, developmental, substantive, technical . . . there are more breakdowns.
Thoughts?

http://www.flyingcolorssuccess.com/bl...
Do you find that you're expected to edit more fully even though someone has told you it will be a "quick" proofread (or copyedit)?
How do you see the differences between the editorial levels?