The Great Gatsby
discussion
The Great Gatsby
date
newest »

message 1:
by
Beau
(new)
-
rated it 4 stars
Apr 13, 2015 06:41AM

reply
|
flag

As for the eyes on the billboard, that was failed imagery. SF´s intent is so murky, let us just say you can read almost anything in it. I suspect that SF was just getting around to catching the winds from Europe, ie. the Surrealism movement, and it is but a paen to his betters. It doesn´t cut it for me at all and is a weak link, of which there are many, in the novel. This is but another example of what makes this masterpiece a flawed bag of words.
Jay went to his watery grave, sunk by his own overweening ambition. When it came to sink or swim, that fish had no choice but the latter. His blind ambitions and naive belief in what America promised him with its Horatio Alger premise doomed him, belying the false hope of America.
Yes, terribly boring,especially the part about the gang going to NYC to party. Pathetic, tawdry characters all. SF had only sympathy for the poor devil.


Baker.

The symbolism in novels is never 100% cut and dried, regardless of what the author originally intended. This is because a multi-layered humanity reads these novels and comes up with different things, one idea usually being as valid as the next.
Regarding the Eyes -- I always thought it had something to do with morality -- the Eyes are always watching and so nobody can get away with anything in the end. And you notice they don't get away with anything. Tom and Daisy get caught in their affairs. Gatsby's fake life is discovered, Myrtle and Gatsby get killed, etc. I don't think they could be just 'eyes on a billboard' because he bothered to include them... while all his characters do immoral things.
Regarding the weather, I always thought it had something to do with starting the story at the beginning of summer when everything is fresh, and ending it with fall coming and everything dying. And tempers heat up in the heat. Yeah that is simplistic, but that is what I think :)

The eyes on the billboard, to me, represents a God like figure and how God sees all, which is how many truths come out. I also think that the weather may have symbolism but I'm not entirely sure... everyone has their own interpretation.

In reviewing literature from this period we note these issues repeatedly throughout. From the Horatio Alger series, to Pride and Prejudice, and even STELLA DALLAS, as late as 1938, delves into issues of upward mobility. We even have movies about that time period, ie. THE TITANIC that explores social mobility.
But post WWII, the emphasis slacks off.

First,his attitude towards his golfing friend changes radically when she criticizes him for his dishonesty. From a casual lover, he turns vindictive, relating how she cheated at golf, how cynical she was and her boredom with life.
Secondly, for an aspiring nouveau riche whose trip to the East was fueled by his newfound position as a bondsman, he turns about face and returns to his home territory. He has learned some good lessons and others falsely arrived at. He sees the East as corrupt, but its his dalliance with the super rich of diva mentality, to be found anywhere where the indolent upper crust congregate, that exposes him to their perfidy. You will find the same in a similar community in Chicago, St. Louis, or wherever you hail from.
This is germane to the shallowness of SF himself, as, if I read it correctly, he too shares Nick's disdain for corrupt New York.
On the other hand, his basic integrity is restored. The Buchanan's have deeply offended, albeit not wholeheartedly acknowledged, his moral being. After meandering throughout the novel as a passive participant in the immoral behaviour of his friends, ie. he never reports Jay's provider of stolen bonds to the police, nor does he report Daisy for her negligent homicide or the very least hit and run, nor object to Tom's white supremacy rant,at the story's end he reaffirms his ¨mid-western morality¨.
Or for that matter, he participates in Tom's tryst with Myrtle as a friend in derelecto. Nor does he upbraid his ¨friend¨ for striking a woman. Nick's moral culpability may not be as much as the Buchanan's but on the other hand, he certainly is not walking with the angels.
But he has given up his half-hearted goal of upward mobility into the moneyed,capitalistic classes. He is disgusted by the treachery around him and wants no part of it, returns to Midwest and cleanses his soul with a novel his creator wrote.

First,his attitude towards his golfing friend changes radically when she criticizes him for his dish..."
Well done, Geoffrey.

For me, the book got off to a slow start also, but the literature just seemed to soar when it came to Gatsby's parties in chapter 3.
For example, at the beginning of chapter 3:
The lights grow brighter as the earth lurches away from the sun, the orchestra is playing yellow cocktail music, and the opera of voices pitches a key higher.
Regarding the billboard with the eyes of Doctor T.J. Eckleburg, I like what Geoffrey and Christine said above. The eyes are described as "blue and gigantic" where the "retinas are one yard high." That sounds to me also like something big like God or morality or maybe some of both.
When I read the book, I wondered about Gatsby's unrelenting desire for Daisy. The Great Gatsby has always been portrayed as a novel criticizing the American dream and the drive for financial success, but it seemed to me that Gatsby already had all that at the beginning of the novel. He wanted something more. He used his American Dream, his financial success for something immoral, (those eyes looking down) a woman who was already married. So it seems to me that there might be something else that Fitzgerald wanted to say? Does anyone else have any ideas on that?
all discussions on this book
|
post a new topic