The Debate Club discussion
: ̗̀➛ Ethics and Education
>
•✩• Do The Standard Curriculums Fairly Represent Diverse Backgrounds?
date
newest »

message 1:
by
Tessie, Assistant Moderator
(new)
Sep 24, 2025 07:04PM

reply
|
flag



I completely agree. I’m homeschooled but my curriculum is commonly used in schools near me. Not only is my information commonly outdated and I am always complaining to my mom about important details they leave out, there is NO good representation. They don’t focus on any black or African American people, even essential ones like Harriet Tubman or Martin Luther King Junior. I have seen no representation of any other races, or even women. The fact that this is a commonly used curriculum? No. If mine is anything to bad off of, and my public school friends’ knowledge is anything to base off of, there is nowhere near enough representation.
I despise the civil war, and not because of slacery, because of the way it’s taught. I think that part should be focusing on the struggles slaves go through, in depths of their lives. And political affairs. I don’t need to hear about how justified the farmers thought they were. And the fact it’s the only war my curriculum at least really teaches about? At this point I’ve heard every bit of American history and I study other countries by myself because I’m not going to any other way. Even if they do in other curriculums I’ve tried, it’s generalized the entirety of Asia. This is why if I ask my parents or a family friend anything about other countries, they’ll just tell me about china stealing our information or the UK has a king or queen and America is so much better because we don’t. This is the level of knowledge currently being taught about other ethnicities and races, and it really shows, and is really sad.
I despise the civil war, and not because of slacery, because of the way it’s taught. I think that part should be focusing on the struggles slaves go through, in depths of their lives. And political affairs. I don’t need to hear about how justified the farmers thought they were. And the fact it’s the only war my curriculum at least really teaches about? At this point I’ve heard every bit of American history and I study other countries by myself because I’m not going to any other way. Even if they do in other curriculums I’ve tried, it’s generalized the entirety of Asia. This is why if I ask my parents or a family friend anything about other countries, they’ll just tell me about china stealing our information or the UK has a king or queen and America is so much better because we don’t. This is the level of knowledge currently being taught about other ethnicities and races, and it really shows, and is really sad.

Khadijah wrote: "I know. Its really upsetting when you know the curriculum that you are learning from has zero true rep. from any sort of group."
Yes! That was kind of a rant but it’s a serious issue. We don’t learn anything about smaller countries, like Kazakhstan for example. I loved Kazakhstan’s culture but school never even mentioned it. China, Japan, and Korea both north and south have all different cultures that deserve to be individually recognized and not grouped together by a ten minute ‘Asia lecture’.
Yes! That was kind of a rant but it’s a serious issue. We don’t learn anything about smaller countries, like Kazakhstan for example. I loved Kazakhstan’s culture but school never even mentioned it. China, Japan, and Korea both north and south have all different cultures that deserve to be individually recognized and not grouped together by a ten minute ‘Asia lecture’.
yeah. like i get it, it is extremely important to know about america, but the bias is crazy. like we did such an in-depth study of semi modern europe, but we only covered other regions until medieval periods? europe isn't even that much more important than other countries, especially after the formation of america. and we never cover modern history. literally i have yet to learn a thing about the 1900s in school.

siera ᯓ★ (semi-ia) wrote: "had to explain to a classy of sixth graders i was from south east asia, that Vietnam and india were in fact in asia, and that asia was the biggest continent 😭 that was a hard day"
what 😭
where did they think vietnam and india were bro
what 😭
where did they think vietnam and india were bro
i also want to point out that a lot of textbooks have no issue referring to indigenous americans as "indians", like bro as an actual indian person i hate that. and im pretty sure actual indigenous people do too

frr like in elementary school I said I was Indian and the class thought I was Native American, and I was like no guys I'm Asian and they were so confused because I don't look east Asian 💀
message 13:
by
Sky ~take from you like you took from me~, Assistant Moderator
(new)
In some grades, we learn a bit about other cultures, but definitely not enough. In 6th grade, I learned about Buddism, Doeism (sorry if I spell these wrong) and one other thing that I can't remember. I don't think I learned anything about other cultures in 7th grade, and I probably won't this year in American History. Perhaps there should be optional courses on other cultures, or have a bigger part of the current curriculum being other cultures?

some of my favorites included french colonialism the the congo, the middle east partitions, navajo codetalkers, and we had a really big focus on indigenous peoples as well, and the important part was that we were supposed to connect these things in history with modern events. can we see effects of this today? is there something that we can apply from this to a current issue? etcetc, and i think that's really important for people to not only know history but also understand and connect it