Fringe Fiction Unlimited discussion

This topic is about
The Roads Chosen
Crime/Mystery/Thriller Recs
>
"How else would you realistically expose such an incredible scheme to an outsider?"
date
newest »


When Sam asks about the pull handles, Leonid could have said, "We put them in to help you."

Sam has proven he has wit. The family prove they are capable and able to read people.
Kelly, I believe, is asking, "How else would [the author] realistically expose such an incredible scheme to an outsider?"
This story stands out for many reasons: one being that the actions taken, the responses and the consequences all lie within the realm of the plausible.
I'll join with Kelly and ask, "Anyone?"

With the family history previously offered, Kelly's appetiser, 'catch them at it' would we believe leave a sour taste. We also thought the same of last minute instructions and a mad rush to get out there and rescue a soul (that's not really credible when we consider how the network is set up).
There are a number of giveaways: Sam whilst in hiding finds an article of clothing. Again, not really credible.
Anyone?

whilst on his travels, did the author need a helping-hand and work it out for himself?
did the author sit behind a desk crossing off the options that would not hold water until he came up with the option that would?

The joint opinion of Vin and his guiding light [Me] is that the author worked it out for himself from his stints on a whole string of rural small holdings. In the book he talks of once the children are tucked in for the night, the elders will talk. That we all know is true. All it takes is a sharp mind and an ability to join the dots. Ohh, and just so you know, our money is on the author studying maths at uni.

"Oh my god!"
"Looks right."
Name the film...

They're not likely to 'tell all', even to a good egg. Looks right!

Will Heidi's question raise more and more questions?
Hunting for the answer to Cal's teaser may take some time.
These are the first words I have put down in a book discussion.
Does this come across as cryptic?

Erin's comment is a tangle. I'm hoping Cal will pledge his life to return with the answer.


Maisie: the word dull does sound a little negative, would it be kinder to say, 'lusterless'?

'They're not likely to 'tell all', even to a good egg.' Looks right!
'...the author worked it out for himself from his stints on a whole string of rural small holdings.' Looks right!
Mary asked the question that I'm sure the author must have asked whilst he was on his travels: 'Where are the bodies?'
Erin: I think your first words are most fitting!

I've just read Heidi's review.
Are you guys a group?
Are you all friends outside of Goodreads?


Hi Sara, please join us, we're mostly full of fun and frolics.
Well put, Erin.
Thanks Mark, for the tip-off: are you a maths genius?





I row in a four: we aim to compete next year so, we're all hard at it. I gotta eat now, I'm on the water early tomorrow. I'll try and get back on in a bit. I wanted to read some of part-two tonight - not enough hours in a day. Ohh, and Mary, thank you for the invite.

I have more time Sunday night. I really do want to spend time on here with you.

I've just read your review; 'so what' - I agree. I should imagine, you'll be flaked out in the armchair by now. I take it the carbs are - good carbs baby, good carbs.

I've just read your review; bravo. '... a little clunky in places — but so what — this is his first novel. And I’ve read some pretty clunky stuff written by authors with years behind their craft.'
I read a book a few years back, written by a world renowned teller of spy stories - one of the first names that come to mind - two spies are sat having supper. ??? placed his wine glass on the table and began, "To begin, ......."
If that ain't clunky what is? The more renowned these people become the less attention is paid to what they pen.

Is the plot set out in the way it is to achieve one aim: find a plausible excuse to expose what the gang of smugglers are up to on their days off? It can be argued!
There are, I'll admit, other essential ingredients: the tie in with the security services, Sam's past experiences with rural folk, and other things I can't think of just now. But really, couldn't that all have been wrapped up by happening to overhear a conversation in the kitchen.
Mr Carlyle (and I'll refer to him as Mister because of the courage he has shown) wanted a credible (bullet proof - able to withstand the criticisms he foresaw - and those criticisms will come) means by which he could peel the lid off what is happening. It's a great plot, a wonderful story, full of teasers, twists and turns. From the very first page, where were we heading?
Saved from the military!!!
Why do you need saving from an establishment that instills discipline, duty, honour, courage?
Debate me!

Goodnight all, and thanks for the friendship and the email addresses.

Is the kitchen event credible? Overhearing a conversation? Sam's sharp but also worldly-wise. Is he going to venture such a belief to those who have risked all for him off the back of a little bit of eavesdropping? We learn so much about the societal struggles by knowing of what Sam has experienced during his travels.
I tend to agree with: ... 'the plot set out in the way it is to achieve one aim: find a plausible excuse to expose what the gang of smugglers are up to on their days off?'
I like that the story is spiced by the failed relationship and how she comes out of her shell in protection of Sam.
I like the addition of the spies in London - there is so much mileage in that: book-two and three, all of which puts dynamic women in the limelight, which is fantastic.
And, ........ your review is fantastic. '... a little clunky in places — but so what — this is ...'
Sam would have to catch them at it. It is however, as you say, a clandestine scheme that has been running for years upon years, so they're not likely to be 'caught at it'.
Even though the family see Sam as a 'good egg', they're not likely to 'tell all'. The question of how Sam would fair when questioned under duress does come up.
Anyone?