The Debate Group discussion

69 views
LGBT etc. > How many genders are there?

Comments Showing 51-100 of 370 (370 new)    post a comment »

Pierce Samuel ✞︎ (My Girlfriend's Ver.) (pierces_melted_wings) | 143 comments Mod
ray pines ✩₊˚.⋆☾⋆ wrote: "➶ 。˚ ° Pierce Samuel ˋ°•*⁀➷ wrote: "That's actually wild 😭 I find cotton too comfy for my comfort LOL

Hello...?? You are actually making zero sense to me. Because I DON'T answer every question w/ ..."


Me when transgender people aren't mentioned in The Bible, so they must not exist (Transgender was not a word until more recent years)


message 52: by Ethan (new)

Ethan Goltiao (John 17:3) | 3 comments also, Ray, the Bible does NOT depend on the reader's interpretation.
2 Peter 1:20 KJV — Knowing this first, that no prophecy of the scripture is of any private interpretation.
This means that all these passages only have ONE meaning.


message 53: by Ethan (new)

Ethan Goltiao (John 17:3) | 3 comments no, obviously transgender wasn't a word till recently. that doesn't mean it wasn't addressed.
first off, the Bible is more than 3000 years old, though the Gospels and Epistles were created 2000 years ago.
secondly, they are not mistranslated. I already stated that you can look at the interlinear to the original Greek/ Hebrew. It proves you wrong.
thirdly, you aren't taking a "deeper look, " you are twisting Scripture.


Pierce Samuel ✞︎ (My Girlfriend's Ver.) (pierces_melted_wings) | 143 comments Mod
Ethan wrote: "also, Ray, the Bible does NOT depend on the reader's interpretation.
2 Peter 1:20 KJV — Knowing this first, that no prophecy of the scripture is of any private interpretation.
This means that all ..."


But we don't know the TRUE real meaning.


Pierce Samuel ✞︎ (My Girlfriend's Ver.) (pierces_melted_wings) | 143 comments Mod
Ethan wrote: "no, obviously transgender wasn't a word till recently. that doesn't mean it wasn't addressed.
first off, the Bible is more than 3000 years old, though the Gospels and Epistles were created 2000 ye..."


Actually, there is proof they were. Take the word "Helper" used to describe Eve for example. The ACTUAL Hebrew word would translate closer to "Rescuer", but since the guy translating was a huge misogynistic jerk, he make it helper instead.


message 56: by Ethan (new)

Ethan Goltiao (John 17:3) | 3 comments I just gave you a whole bunch of verses, with a whole bunch of different reasons why they aren't just misinterpreted.💀
also, your said the Bible's "message" depends on how the reader interpreted it. message isn't the same thing as the reader's opinion.


message 57: by Faith (new)

Faith Fonté (faithers90310) ➶ 。˚ ° Pierce Samuel ˋ°•*⁀➷ wrote: "Ethan wrote: "now it gets kinda gray for me cause it's kinda hard figuring WHAT laws are not needed anymore. the ones listed as abominations will still remain as abominations, as God doesn't change..."

werent u the one that agreeed with me about not having to follow the old law after Jesus rose from the dead?


message 58: by Ethan (new)

Ethan Goltiao (John 17:3) | 3 comments it actually means more like "succour," or really just "help. "
plus, doesn't the Bible also refer to God as our help, too?


message 59: by Ethan (new)

Ethan Goltiao (John 17:3) | 3 comments yes and that includes ten commandments and all that but what about the Sabbath and not touching dead animals and not eating pork?


message 60: by Ethan (new)

Ethan Goltiao (John 17:3) | 3 comments that's what I'm gray about.


message 61: by Ethan (new)

Ethan Goltiao (John 17:3) | 3 comments well, Ray, you should have said that. you didn't say that the first time.


Pierce Samuel ✞︎ (My Girlfriend's Ver.) (pierces_melted_wings) | 143 comments Mod
Faith wrote: "➶ 。˚ ° Pierce Samuel ˋ°•*⁀➷ wrote: "Ethan wrote: "now it gets kinda gray for me cause it's kinda hard figuring WHAT laws are not needed anymore. the ones listed as abominations will still remain as..."

Yeah, I was making an exaggeration lol


Pierce Samuel ✞︎ (My Girlfriend's Ver.) (pierces_melted_wings) | 143 comments Mod
Ethan wrote: "it actually means more like "succour," or really just "help. "
plus, doesn't the Bible also refer to God as our help, too?"


Absolutely, but when the first woman is categorized as a "helper" instead of her own independent person. AND the translater is LITERALLY misogynistic, I'll let you do the math.


message 64: by Ethan (new)

Ethan Goltiao (John 17:3) | 3 comments could you expound on your point on the translator being misogynistic? also, that's the literal interpretation, sooo


message 65: by Ethan (new)

Ethan Goltiao (John 17:3) | 3 comments also helper literally implies that the person they're helping can't do it on their own. that's not an insult.


Pierce Samuel ✞︎ (My Girlfriend's Ver.) (pierces_melted_wings) | 143 comments Mod
Ethan wrote: "could you expound on your point on the translator being misogynistic? also, that's the literal interpretation, sooo"

https://youtube.com/shorts/5Vv-E3n1ZT... This video explains it well!!


Pierce Samuel ✞︎ (My Girlfriend's Ver.) (pierces_melted_wings) | 143 comments Mod
Ethan wrote: "also helper literally implies that the person they're helping can't do it on their own. that's not an insult."

Watch the video I just sent.


Pierce Samuel ✞︎ (My Girlfriend's Ver.) (pierces_melted_wings) | 143 comments Mod
ANYWAY, we're getting way off track here.


message 69: by Ethan (new)

Ethan Goltiao (John 17:3) | 3 comments true😂


message 70: by Ethan (new)

Ethan Goltiao (John 17:3) | 3 comments yeeaah it does look he was misogynistic 😅 but the point still stands that translated directly from Hebrew, it does come pretty close to help, rather than rescue. again, God was described as a Help.


message 71: by Ethan (new)

Ethan Goltiao (John 17:3) | 3 comments but yeah let's move on😂


Pierce Samuel ✞︎ (My Girlfriend's Ver.) (pierces_melted_wings) | 143 comments Mod
adrienne ♡ wrote: "idk I think two? but only bc I wouldn't really call using they/them or neo pronouns it's own GENDER, I would say it's more of an identity. yk what I mean? like boy/girl are genders, but non binary ..."

Oh kinda like how white isn't a color, more so the absence of such?


message 73: by adrienne ♡ (new)

adrienne ♡ (shessochillandcool) ➶ 。˚ ° Pierce Samuel ˋ°•*⁀➷ wrote: "adrienne ♡ wrote: "idk I think two? but only bc I wouldn't really call using they/them or neo pronouns it's own GENDER, I would say it's more of an identity. yk what I mean? like boy/girl are gende..."

wait are you being sarcastic or genuine bc honestly idk I just feel like the point of non binary is that it isn't in a category, so saying it's a gender turns it into a binary thing, if that makes sense idk😭


message 74: by adrienne ♡ (new)

adrienne ♡ (shessochillandcool) ray pines ✩₊˚.⋆☾⋆ wrote: "adrienne ♡ wrote: "idk I think two? but only bc I wouldn't really call using they/them or neo pronouns it's own GENDER, I would say it's more of an identity. yk what I mean? like boy/girl are gende..."

no totally I think I get what you're saying. but yeah like what I said to Pierce, I feel like the point of non binary is that it isn't in a category, so saying it's a gender turns it into a binary thing, if that makes sense idk😭 but no I totally get what you're saying and that makes sense fs


message 75: by Ethan (new)

Ethan Goltiao (John 17:3) | 3 comments no Ray, you didn't. as I said, you did not mention opinion the first time. look back dude. there's a difference between message and opinion.


message 76: by Ethan (new)

Ethan Goltiao (John 17:3) | 3 comments "Pierce is doing his own research though and it is leading him to his own conclusions because the Bible's MESSAGE DOES DEPEND ON HOW THE READER INTERPRETED IT. That's how we have groups like Jehovah's Witness and the Mormons and Catholics and Protestants and Fundamentalists and so on"

that's what you said bro.


message 77: by Ethan (new)

Ethan Goltiao (John 17:3) | 3 comments and meaning and message is the same thing


message 78: by Ethan (new)

Ethan Goltiao (John 17:3) | 3 comments did you not just see what I said? smh


Pierce Samuel ✞︎ (My Girlfriend's Ver.) (pierces_melted_wings) | 143 comments Mod
adrienne ♡ wrote: "➶ 。˚ ° Pierce Samuel ˋ°•*⁀➷ wrote: "adrienne ♡ wrote: "idk I think two? but only bc I wouldn't really call using they/them or neo pronouns it's own GENDER, I would say it's more of an identity. yk ..."

No I'm being genuine lol!


message 80: by Ethan (new)

Ethan Goltiao (John 17:3) | 3 comments you then said this
"yeah... funny thing about that... everyone has a different opinion of that one meaning

so basically only the original authors and this God that is spoken of would know the original meaning of what was written, everybody else just guesses"
we weren't talking about opinion, we were taking about what the Bible truly means. not just like, "this is what I think the Bible says!" "oh cool! this is what I think it is!" we're having a debate to find the true meaning of the verses.


message 81: by Ethan (new)

Ethan Goltiao (John 17:3) | 3 comments my problem is that you were intellectually inconsistent. look at the comments I just brought back.


message 82: by Ethan (new)

Ethan Goltiao (John 17:3) | 3 comments sounded like you were just expounding on what you said rather than correcting an error.


message 83: by Ethan (new)

Ethan Goltiao (John 17:3) | 3 comments like next time could you actually contribute something to the conversation? you contributed nothing.


message 84: by Ethan (new)

Ethan Goltiao (John 17:3) | 3 comments bro this is a debate group😂 you wanna say something? expect to get replied.


message 85: by Ethan (new)

Ethan Goltiao (John 17:3) | 3 comments thx Bob!


message 86: by Ethan (new)

Ethan Goltiao (John 17:3) | 3 comments I'm not the one who wants the discussion to end, Ray💀
you're the one that was cussing me out😂 talk about civil


Pierce Samuel ✞︎ (My Girlfriend's Ver.) (pierces_melted_wings) | 143 comments Mod
Ethan wrote: "I'm not the one who wants the discussion to end, Ray💀
you're the one that was cussing me out😂 talk about civil"


Then why do you keep engaging if you want it to end?


Pierce Samuel ✞︎ (My Girlfriend's Ver.) (pierces_melted_wings) | 143 comments Mod
ray ⋆☾⋆ wrote: "Pierce would you think it’s fair to split gender into 4 categories being cisgender, transgender, nonbinary, and gender fluid. and those could be like umbrella terms for specific identities maybe?"

I think 4, yes. But I think it would be Male, Female, Non-binary, and Gender Queer.


message 89: by ellie ⭑.ᐟ (new)

ellie ⭑.ᐟ (httpsyoutube68aej2qmctw) personally i fee like trans is te giant umbrella then theres nonbinary under it with gednerflui, agender, etc


message 90: by Ethan (new)

Ethan Goltiao (John 17:3) | 3 comments pierce did you even read what I said😂 i said I wasn't the one who wanted it to end anyway I'm done you guys lost.


message 91: by Ethan (new)

Ethan Goltiao (John 17:3) | 3 comments seems ironic saying that😂


Pierce Samuel ✞︎ (My Girlfriend's Ver.) (pierces_melted_wings) | 143 comments Mod
Ethan wrote: "pierce did you even read what I said😂 i said I wasn't the one who wanted it to end anyway I'm done you guys lost."

Whatever helps you sleep at night, mate.


message 93: by Ethan (new)

Ethan Goltiao (John 17:3) | 3 comments whatever bro you couldn't read 😂


Pierce Samuel ✞︎ (My Girlfriend's Ver.) (pierces_melted_wings) | 143 comments Mod
Ethan wrote: "whatever bro you couldn't read 😂"

I'm actually in AP English, and a published author, but I love the enthusiasm <3


message 95: by ellie ⭑.ᐟ (new)

ellie ⭑.ᐟ (httpsyoutube68aej2qmctw) Love how we are resorting to "insults"


message 96: by Ethan (new)

Ethan Goltiao (John 17:3) | 3 comments still failed to read💀 I got 1st place in an English tournament last year


message 97: by Ethan (new)

Ethan Goltiao (John 17:3) | 3 comments ye mb guys I take back all of that I'll try to be more professional


message 98: by Ethan (new)

Ethan Goltiao (John 17:3) | 3 comments sure buddy you haven't said a word at all this discussion.


message 99: by Ethan (new)

Ethan Goltiao (John 17:3) | 3 comments yes exactly let's start the discussion then


Pierce Samuel ✞︎ (My Girlfriend's Ver.) (pierces_melted_wings) | 143 comments Mod
Ethan wrote: "still failed to read💀 I got 1st place in an English tournament last year"

Then try to capitalize the beginning of your sentences <3 And sure, you may be good at reading, but being good at reading and being good at media literacy and reading between the lines are two different things.


back to top