Fast Moving Killas discussion

This topic is about
The Faithful Executioner
The Faithful Executioner
>
(4) The Sage
date
newest »


My question for this chapter:
What reasons does the author give for why Frantz viewed acts of class violence and burglary as particularly dishonorable?
message 3:
by
Tony, Emperor and Autocrat
(last edited Jun 26, 2025 07:06PM)
(new)
-
rated it 3 stars
In response to Ryan's question:
I didn't realize that both of our questions are quite similar until after I finished mine. Regardless, Frantz views these acts as dishonorable since it can tarnish the perpetrators family name and that repeating the offense (which was common in most of Frantz's criminals) can gain you less sympathy from both your families, community, and court officials. He also found that these acts go against his core Lutheran beliefs.
I didn't realize that both of our questions are quite similar until after I finished mine. Regardless, Frantz views these acts as dishonorable since it can tarnish the perpetrators family name and that repeating the offense (which was common in most of Frantz's criminals) can gain you less sympathy from both your families, community, and court officials. He also found that these acts go against his core Lutheran beliefs.
Here is my question:
In this section, we learn that Frantz has a mostly unsympathetic view on thievery compared to today's society. Frantz believes that the thieves allowed themselves to be hung since they knew the risks of stealing. Meanwhile modern society would be against a death penalty for burglary. Do you agree with Frantz's stance, or do you think it is a barbaric mindset? Is it possible that most people in that time period thought the same as Frantz or did his job influence his opinions?